by StarmanSkye » Sun May 07, 2006 10:03 pm
Heath7<br>Hey, c'mon!<br><br>Why would you or anyone else reasonably sharp expect to understand the incredible complexities and nuances of South American politics in a 30-second soundbite? Especially given the statement is an imperfect-at-best English translation of Spanish with a strong meztizo/indigenous perspective, isn't given ANY context at all, and given the long history of Anglo subversion, exploitation, interference, and cooption of South American politics? Hell, 30-second soundbite political-analysis doesn't even work well (as far as understanding anything, anyway) in the place where it's been cultivated into a PR art-form.<br><br>Jeff's take onnit fits my understanding -- If the opposition boycotts an election they can't POSSIBLY win simply because Chavez is so popular, they will likely come-back at one point and criticize him for ruling like an unelected dictator -- which they've ALREADY done despite his having won resounding electoral victories. If I heard something like the above, I'd immediately suspect something else was going on.<br><br>I'd have thought regular readers on this forum would be extra-savvy about lengths the desperate, sneaky US-leaning power-hungry, greed-obsessed, rightwing fascist elites would go to undermine ANY broad-based leftist-empowered people's movement -- especially in that leftist, popular presidents who challenge the PTB aren't especially prone to employing slick Public Relations firms to 'manage' and market their anglo image to make it palatable for the MSM sharks. ( :<br><br>Just a momentary lapse of perspective, I'd say, eh?<br>Starman <p></p><i></i>