8 part high quality docu on the Illuminati

Moderators: DrVolin, Elvis, Jeff

Re: saw this a while back.

Postby Qutb » Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:20 pm

Or from the good laugh you get when it is announced that this is a "secret Illuminati handshake". <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I would argue.

Postby slimmouse » Sat Mar 04, 2006 8:25 pm

<br> I might be tempted to argue, that as far as the layman is concerned, it could well be a case of 2 old guys with Arthritis..<br><br> You and I of course know better. Its the Freemasonic handshake. I once again must thank you for pointing out that of the recent US pressies, only the Bushies are S+B. Reagan meanwhile of course was a shriner ( Scottish Rite firm)<br><br> But what would your average punter see this as, unless this was pointed out in albeit rather dramatic terms ?<br><br> Two arthritic old men shaking hands no doubt.<br><br> Illuminati ( enlightened one) = Freemason ( in his own mind at least) - Same feller, same hat ( usually white and pointed). <br><br> I am of course referring to those at the top of the pyramid - not yer average worker bee. Since the average freemasonic worker bee, does indeed consider himself a pillar of society ( and quite usually is) - In terms of morals, social status, Work ethics etc. <br><br> Which is actually the precise reason these people were selected in the first place. <br><br> But of course, as in virtually every strata of human existence, they are actually pawns in the game - albeit the Marble carved variety as opposed to the Wooden, the papiere mache and the pebble form.<br><br> So, in summary ; Illuminati - High level freemason. Whats the difference ? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 3/4/06 6:06 pm<br></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: I would argue.

Postby NewKid » Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:03 pm

Just a suggestion, but if you want to be taken halfway seriously, you'll stop using the term illuminati, new world order, masons, etc. when talking about these guys. Now, maybe this filmmaker has it all figured out, but as a matter a persuasive technique, it might make it easier to get people to stop laughing if you make it look less like a caricature of conspiracy theory. Getting rid of Ted Gunderson wouldn't hurt either. <br><br>By the way, why are the illuminati giving the secret handshakes and handsignals in public? Did they pick the hook 'em horns sign just so nobody would believe that it's really the satanic greeting? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

thank you and another question

Postby mother » Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:55 pm

I'll see if I can get it going without breaking this new laptop or something. Home alone with ALL kids &co out of town, so no computer help. But I have another question about films which I have been meaning to ask. Does anyone remember the documentary, "Controlling Interests"? I saw that as a student, and it absolutely floored me. It was a series of interviews with very powerful and rich men, by the filmaker who created "Hearts and Minds". It is safe to say that I never viewed the world in the same way after that. When I try to use google I only get ads, so I can't offer the filmaker's name. How about calling them globalists, or is that something too different? <p></p><i></i>
mother
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Hey, Ma, How About....

Postby Floyd Smoots » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:07 pm

....The Good Ol' Boyz, as in the well-known, worldwide, in any language, network of "them whut has" vs. "them whut ain't"??? Jist a thought, mind ya. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :( --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/frown.gif ALT=":("><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Controlling Interest

Postby thurnandtaxis » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:15 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0023">www.newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0023</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>video available from California Newsreel, a progressive social issue documentary distributor founded in 1968.<br><br>About the film:<br><br>VHS and 16mm <br>45 minutes, 1978<br>Producer/Director: Larry Adelman, Co-Producer/Editor: Bruce Schmeichen<br><br>This is the film that helped kick-off the anti-globalization movement. Upon its release, Controlling Interest quickly became a standard "audio-visual text" for those concerned about the growing impact of multinational corporations on global affairs. The film examines how the ever-increasing concentration and velocity of capital affect employment in the U.S., shape patterns of development in the Third World, and influence our nation's foreign policy.<br><br>Remarkably candid interviews with business executive provide a rare glimpse of the reasoning behind corporate global strategy and their never-ending search for resources, ever-cheaper labor, and new markets. The film documents the impact of their decisions on people around the world, including how<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"freedom" has come increasingly to mean the freedom of global corporations to operate anywhere in the world. </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> The film includes case studies from Massachusetts' declining machine tool industry, Brazil's "economic miracle," and Chile before and after the 1973 coup. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thurnandtaxis>thurnandtaxis</A> at: 3/4/06 7:18 pm<br></i>
thurnandtaxis
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I would argue.

Postby thumperton » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:29 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Just a suggestion, but if you want to be taken halfway seriously, you'll stop using the term illuminati, new world order, masons, etc. when talking about these guys. Now, maybe this filmmaker has it all figured out, but as a matter a persuasive technique, it might make it easier to get people to stop laughing if you make it look less like a caricature of conspiracy theory. Getting rid of Ted Gunderson wouldn't hurt either.<br><br>By the way, why are the illuminati giving the secret handshakes and handsignals in public? Did they pick the hook 'em horns sign just so nobody would believe that it's really the satanic greeting?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->people like you are way too far behind the curve to understand, and only come acknowledge the NWO now because it's the trendy thing to do.<br><br>The time for sugar coating, self-delusion, and yuppiness are over. Like the terms or not, they are what they are. The people who don't take this seriously are the same people who rationalize that everything is perfectly fine. Those people are hopeless. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thumperton@rigorousintuition>thumperton</A> at: 3/4/06 7:29 pm<br></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Controlling Interest VS. Illuminati Doc

Postby thurnandtaxis » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:35 pm

Its easy to get the fat cats to start talking about their corporate or financial philosophies on film. EASIER, I should say, than getting them to discuss to the same degree, why they like to gather in their various "fraternities" and "cross swords" or whatever the @#%* they do in <br>the name of JAHBULON and explain the other assorted naughty hocus pocuses that have filtered out about the initiatory rites they've engaged in.<br><br>Ask Bush...<br>Ask Kerry...<br>Ask Robertson...<br>Ask ANY of them...<br><br>Why so SPOOKY? <p></p><i></i>
thurnandtaxis
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: thank you and another question

Postby thumperton » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:39 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I'll see if I can get it going without breaking this new laptop or something. Home alone with ALL kids &co out of town, so no computer help. But I have another question about films which I have been meaning to ask. Does anyone remember the documentary, "Controlling Interests"? I saw that as a student, and it absolutely floored me. It was a series of interviews with very powerful and rich men, by the filmaker who created "Hearts and Minds". It is safe to say that I never viewed the world in the same way after that. When I try to use google I only get ads, so I can't offer the filmaker's name. How about calling them globalists, or is that something too different?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->calling them globalists makes them sound like mega corporate CEO's instead of what they really are (worshippers of lucifer). That may give the idea that their goals are simply financial consolidation instead of something far worse.<br><br>This half-way definition for the sake of making the message more palatable does not have the full gravitas as the complete truth, and doesn't wake people up. <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Just think Pyramid.

Postby slimmouse » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:48 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>freedom" has come increasingly to mean the freedom of global corporations to operate anywhere in the world.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> Couple this with ;<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> Its easy to get the fat cats to start talking about their corporate or financial philosophies on film. EASIER, I should say, than getting them to discuss to the same degree, why they like to gather in their various "fraternities" and "cross swords" or whatever the @#%* they do in<br>the name of JAHBULON and explain the other assorted naughty hocus pocuses that have filtered out about the initiatory rites they've engaged in.<br><br>Ask Bush...<br>Ask Kerry...<br>Ask Robertson...<br>Ask ANY of them...<br><br>Why so SPOOKY?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br> And then combine both of the above with the enshrined laws as are written at the head of the hydra ( See Anti's data dump, and sworn testimony ).<br><br> And then , with the greatest RI instinct in you, try and tell me this ISNT how the whole fucking charade is played out.<br><br> Throw in for Good measure, the JFK and RFK hit, The Pope JP1 hit, and probably the most telling of all - The Diana assassination.<br><br> You can of course go off at various tangents, and quote Peter Dale Scott, and Dugin, and various other mindfucks and distractions (relativeley speaking).<br><br> In some ways of course, they do have their relevance to the bigger picture.<br><br> Kinda like the marble pawns. Or is that the Marble knights ?<br><br> Or are these marble knights Bush, Blair and Co ? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 3/4/06 7:58 pm<br></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

RE: I would argue.

Postby mother » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:49 pm

Point well taken, thumperton. Especially because of their very dark spiritual orientation, inverted by their perversity to be called light. And thank you so much thurandtaxis! They interviewed J.P. Morgan, and maybe a Rockerfeller and others. The body language was what got me. They were so cruel and frightening, and even then I realised that there are, like 10 evil guys who rule the world, it was stunning and horribly depressing. Possibly more so because we were never allowd to wach TV as kids so a heavy film might be even more so. <p></p><i></i>
mother
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: thank you and another question

Postby thumperton » Sat Mar 04, 2006 10:59 pm

Furthermore, many people have a hard time graduating from the idea that while the Bush cabal is no doubt evil, that's simply one side of the dialectic. They think that money is the only motivation, and so they trace a line from the oil interests to the Iraqi War to the Military Industrial Complex, and etc. losing sight of the fact that AMERICA IS SET UP TO LOSE, just like Nazi Germany in the way Hitler's 6th Army betrayed him. We have to remember that the NWO will not be brought about by imperialism conquest, but by a peace that will rise from the ashes of total devestation. Armed conflict is the most traumatic thing that can be wrought, and most effective tool in social engineering. This is purpose for wars.<br><br>In order of revelance, here are their goals and modus operandi:<br><br>1. World Government and population reduction<br><br>2. Total War<br><br>3. Make money for the military industrial complex/oil industry/etc.<br><br>This article explains things much better than I could:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.savethemales.ca/000936.html">www.savethemales.ca/000936.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enough of the negative Thumper.

Postby slimmouse » Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:04 pm

<br><br> Enough of the negative.<br><br> You obviously know the score.<br><br> In which case, you should also realise that thought creates.<br><br> They know that thought creates. Make no mistake. Hence the constant fear rhetoric.<br><br> Think positive <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Controlling Interests

Postby thumperton » Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:08 pm

Is this Controlling Interests movie on youtube.com? <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Controlling Interests

Postby thurnandtaxis » Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:47 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Is this Controlling Interests movie on youtube.com?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Probably not.<br><br>I would think that aside from buying a vhs from the distributor it will be hard to see this particular film. Some libraries or colleges "may" have a copy, but since it came out in 1978, it's doubtful that such institutes still<br>have it, especially if they had a 16mm print. You could have your local library do an inter-library search and loan for you though. <br>Of course then "THEY"<br>will know that you "know"... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Other than that home use copies can be bought from California Newsreel<br>for $29.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0023">www.newsreel.org/nav/title.asp?tc=CN0023</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thurnandtaxis>thurnandtaxis</A> at: 3/4/06 8:50 pm<br></i>
thurnandtaxis
 
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Secret Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest