Icke's royal bloodline theory

Moderators: DrVolin, 82_28, Elvis, Jeff

Re: Edward viii a nazi sympathizer?

Postby rain » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:00 pm

<br>"I actually think he believes all that crap about 911 and Osama and the war on terror"<br><br>I don't.<br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Johnnie Howard a nazi sympathizer?

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:06 pm

Probably, but then again he's probably too gutless to even face that in himself.<br><br>That decency thing just blows me away.<br><br>Like some lady on the telly or radio talking to him in Perth the other day...<br><br>"I liked everything you have done and stuff up till now but I don't like those Industrial Relations laws..."<br><br>I wanted to scream with frustration at that comment.<br><br>I genuinely thought the reason he got reelcted was short sighted self interest (something the little 4 eyebrowed mr sheen wannabe has in spades). Everyone in the suburbs is really up against it. Most people are paying huge mortgages with interest rates not that high...<br><br>Most people are also effectively one or two paychecks from the street. With petrol prices skyrocketing a half a percent increase in interest rates could cost many people their homes.<br><br>The trauma of that recession we had to have is still in people's minds I think. (Remeber Interest rates will rise under labour?)<br><br>And I actually had someone once tell me they voted for Howard because of the asylum seeker issue.<br><br>They genuinely thought he was doing the right thing by locking up potential terrorists coming to Aussie in leaky wooden boats to fly planes into the rialto or something.<br><br>I could see my opinion of this person plummeting as they spoke. I couldn't believe someone could think so uncritically.<br><br>Who needs Diebold when you can play off fear and incalculable stupidity.<br><br>But that brings up why I loathe the little turd.<br><br>His cowardice is infectious. The debate on all issues in Australia is one clothed in the regalia of fear and the inability to confront and deal with it.<br><br>He is a chookshit coward and unfortunately his personality is influencing things in Australia far too much.<br><br>Thats it for that rant. <p></p><i></i>
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 9349
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

who needs diebold

Postby rain » Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:36 pm

nicely put again, Joe.<br><br>but I see it more as a symbiotic relationship.<br><br>when the screws are turned, everybody responds to protect their own arses.<br>you see, that's Icky's reptilian genes or as Castaneda put it 'they gave us their minds'.<br><br>and the lack of critical thinking, I find simply stunning. quite literally.<br><br>quite funny and apt re: Packer<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
rain
 
Posts: 704
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 12:38 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: who needs diebold

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:57 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>when the screws are turned, everybody responds to protect their own arses.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Yes that is very true.<br><br>But I think thats a symptom. "Ever since we lost our common ground.."<br><br>Something mr divide and conquer wedge politics exploits v well.<br><br>Rat cunning... And he does look like a rat...<br><br>Shapeshifting ratillians<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>BTW We just had a visit from the Jo Hos.<br><br>I am woorking on converting them <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Anyway back to the reptillian genes...<br><br>and "they gave us their minds..."<br><br>The only traditional Aussie value Little johnnie gets is sport, and success at sport.<br><br>But our success internationally comes mostly from money.<br><br>Sure there are cultural things, its what we do. Play outdoors, but the only bit he gets is celebrating with the winners. (Not with Cathy Freeman tho. When she won that Olympic gold Medal in Sydney, johnnie was at the Basketball. Good on him for supporting the Boomers or the Opals or whoever he was watching.)<br><br>As you may know I am a total footy head (wasn't as much when I lived in Melb, but an essay you're familiar with gets to the root of why I was like that.)<br><br>But to me the essence of football is being 3 goals down with 5 minutes or 10 to play. Or even 10 goals down and absolutely no chance of winning.<br><br>Thats when the hard question gets asked. Thats when you have to be prepared to suffer so you and your teammates can achieve what you set out to do. (Play with a little honour and dignity) Little Johnnie does not get that biit. For him its all about the glory. Where was the photo op of him watching the Socceroos against Italy?<br><br>Can't support losers can we...<br><br>There are all these other australian values...<br><br>He has ignored them, co opted the concept of mateship to his bullshit agenda and then pissed on the things it was really about.<br><br>Like Eureka. Like the miners strikes and gubberment sending in the soldiers 60 odd years ago. Like the concept of the Commonwealth. This is our lot and we share it to our mutual benefit. (many of these are lies and myths sure, but people in this land have believed those lies and myths and done great things with them.)<br><br> His definition of Australia is the worst of us, not the best. <p></p><i></i>
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 9349
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: who needs diebold

Postby bkkexile » Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:15 am

.....even his 'love' of sport seems insincere to me.....like he doesn't really get it........liek most people who follow the Wallabies ;P <p></p><i></i>
bkkexile
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:03 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: who needs diebold

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:51 am

When I lived in Melb I didn't give a fuck about rugby.<br><br>I remember sitting in a bar at ulla airport going for the all blacks just to stick it up the cockheads in suits that infested the place.<br><br>But go the wallabies tomorrow night. (Been working with a kiwi all week, on a building site. So its gotta be us v them. Here's to peace love and understanding <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> )<br><br>Anyway I gotta sell raffle tickets for the fire brigade.<br><br>Have a great Friday night all. <p></p><i></i>
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 9349
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby gls » Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:59 pm

I may be missing the point here somewhat but what's so strange about the royal family being descended from reptiles? Aren't we all?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o ... _evolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-complex
gls
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Seminal Site for Purported Genealogy Connections

Postby Lord Balto » Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:20 pm

Take a look at this site if you are interested in purported descendants of royal houses:

http://fabpedigree.com/

The data is all from the internet and unattested but interesting nonetheless, and will give you an idea just how complex this type of thing can get.
User avatar
Lord Balto
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:34 pm
Location: Interzone
Blog: View Blog (0)

DNA Timescales

Postby Lord Balto » Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:18 pm

As for some of the nonsense I've run into here about DNA time scales:

Quoting Wikipedia on DNA is silly. In fact, quoting Wikipedia on anything is silly. The fact is my own female Haplogroup is W, which goes back to East Africa 20,000 years ago. "Eve" goes back more than 100,000 years. My Y Haplogroup is E3b1c1, which goes back to the Eastern Mediterranean (ancient Canaan) about 30,000 years ago. The oldest surviving Y Haplogroup is A, which goes back 60,000. And these figures are all based on humans living today. It doesn't mean we don't have ancestors that went back millions of years before this particular set of mutations.

As for royal ancestors, the only thing I have so far is some Levite ancestors, who supposedly go back to Levi, the brother of Joseph (1420-1365 BC) who may or may not have been a real person. My High Resolution Native Population Match has me as Csango (51.94) from eastern Rumania after Hungarian Ashkenazi (45.08). The Csango claim descent from one of the sons of Attila the Hun, who occupied Hungary in the early centuries AD.
User avatar
Lord Balto
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:34 pm
Location: Interzone
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to Secret Societies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests