Anybody have any idea where this serial killer lives now?

by **RickTurpin** » Sat Oct 08, 2005 10:55 pm

Ken Littleton is evidently a sexual predator and he knows Canada/Ottawa as well as he knows ideal U.S. communities where his many, innocent victims lead normal lives, until he strikes. When the heat is hot on his tail, Ken Littleton vanishes without a trace, just like many of his victims. When Littleton sought to evade the heat over the Martha Moxley murder, he hooked up with Mary Baker, an alcoholic who was in recovery. Littleton and Baker moved to Canada and married in Ottawa on April 27, 1983. In a 1991 interview with the Connecticut police conducted in Ottawa - an interview that has never been published - Baker described Littleton as “going nuts” He called Martha’s father, David Moxley, Baker said, and asked for money to undergo sodium-pentothal testing, [sounds like fellow spy, Lucianne Goldberg’s lethal version of Robert Deniro in Meet the Fockers] offering to give Moxley copies of the tapes. Littleton said he thought the testing would give him peace of mind and perhaps help him to remember things that happened the night of the murder. He told Moxley that Martha’s murder was their “mutual tragedy.” Despite his offer to David Moxley, Littleton never did submit to a sodium-pentothal test, although, according to his wife, he remained obsessed by the idea. In Canada, Littleton was unable to work owing to instability and alchoholism. He and Baker played golf and lived of money she had inherited. Baker told the police that Littleton liked pornography and would often visit strip bars. In June of 1983 his arm was mangled during a knife fight in Hull, Quebec. That autumn the Canadian police arrested him for disruptive conduct near the Canadian Parliament building. According to Baker, Littleton sometimes threatened to kill her. He would become particularly depressed, she told the police, around Halloween, the anniversary of Martha’s murder. In october of 1989 she threw him out and separated from him. In May of 1990 he threw hot coffee on her and tried to force his way into her house. Littleton moved in with a manic-depressive stripper named Kimberley, in Boston’s Combat Zone. He planned to become a male stripper and join Kimberley in her act. He and Baker were divorced on July 12, 1990. By August of 1991, when Connecticut law-enforcement authorities reopened the Moxley case, Littleton, still a prime suspect, had again been institutionalized, for manic depression and paranoid delusions, at McLean Hospital, in Belmont. Jack Solomon; Sergeant Frank Garr, of the Greenwich police; and Detroit homicide detectives, whom the Greenwich police had brought in to help them with their investigation, all believed that Littleton might be responsible for a string of unsolved homicides in Massachusetts, Florida, Maine, New York and Canada. On September 23, 1991, Garr went to Ottawa to examine the police files on three young women who had disappeared during a twenty-three-day period in 1988. None of the bodies were ever found. In Garr’s report he concluded, “All three women were last seen in the same vicinity…within close proximity to where Ken Littleton had resided.” On December 15, 1992, Littleton took a polygraph exam administered by the nationally recognized polygraph expert Robert Brisentine. The test again indicated that Littleton “was not truthful when he denied causing the death of Miss Moxley.” After confirming these results in a second test, Brisentine left the examining room. According to someone close to the conversation, he took Solomon aside and said, “The man who murdered Martha Moxley is sitting in that room. Don’t ever let anyone persuade you otherwise.” Ken Littleton has failed five polygraphs about the Moxley murder. Ken Littleton’s perverse life, raises a red flag everytime a young woman is murdered, and the recent discovery of eighteen-year-old Jennifer Teague’s decomposing body, is one such case. Her body — partly covered by tree branches — was found near a hiking trail, steps from a frequently used parking lot in Ottawa’s west end. It was about 5 kilometres from the fast food restaurant where she worked. She disappeared after working the late shift Sept. 8. Staff-Sgt. Monique Ackland said the cause of death was not immediately known. Police did not say whether Teague had been sexually assaulted, nor whether she was fully clothed when discovered. Ackland said police are not ruling out the possibility that a serial killer is responsible, and if Ken Littleton was in Ottawa, he murdered Jennifer Teague because that is what serial killers like Ken Littleton do. <a href="http://www.geocities.com/askwebprowler/sutton.htm">www.geocities.com/askwebp...sutton.htm</a>

by **banned** » Sun Oct 09, 2005 12:36 am

Some times I think my life is a mess, but I have never known any manic depressive strippers. I had a roommate once who lived a diet of plain spaghetti with no sauce, M&Ms, and diet Pepsi and never paid the utility bill, but she was about the worst. Seriously, I read "Murder in Greenwich"--I think that was the title, it wasn't the Mark Fuhrman book--years before Michael Skakel's arrest, and came away not convinced of his guilt, but not convinced of Littleton's either. I didn't follow Skakel's trial, because I try really hard not to follow celebrity trials (I live less than 5 miles from the San Mateo County courthouse and did a heroic job of ignoring the Peterson case almost to the very end, at which point I admitted I thought Scotty was guilty but would not have wanted to be on the jury since I wasn't sufficiently sure to vote for the death penalty.) Don't you think with all the Kennedy money and connections, they could have pinned it on Littleton if it was at all possible to get Michael off?

by **Avalon** » Sun Oct 09, 2005 11:30 pm

Littleton is also the name of the town where the Columbine mass murders occurred.

by **RickTurpin** » Mon Oct 10, 2005 10:40 am

"There was so little evidence of guilt that he shouldn't have even been charged. This is a monstrous verdict. It has nothing to do with whatever really happened on that night. ... I am horrified. I think this is a terrible miscarriage of justice." Skakel "was convicted because the jury didn't believe the defense witnesses. He was convicted because of who he is and who had taken up the cause of the other side and for no other reason, If it weren't for the celebrity aspect of the case, [Skakel] would never have been arrested and prosecuted." June 8, 2002...New Haven Civil Rights Attorney John Williams...Hartford Courant I hope that answers your question. By the way, nobody knows when, where or how Laci Peterson was murdered. You would think they'd figure that out before trying to prosecute anybody -

by **RickTurpin** » Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:22 pm

The above link where my report was published is no longer active, I think the censors have shut down the site. This is what I had written, that caused them to censor: pretty tame stuff, don't you think? ________ A comprehensive analysis of Sutton Report ----------------------------------------- The Sutton Report clearly exposes the fact that when it comes to deception, Ken Littleton is an absolute master, and anybody who doubts his guilt, is too gullible to take seriously. “I have a definite feeling in my mind,” he told our investigator, “that this murder was committed after 10:30 at night." “Why do you say that? he was asked. “Because,” he responded cryptically. The investigators inappropriately cleared Ken Littleton, because, in their words: "... the perpetrator was most likely in a state of severe psychosis and intoxication. While we have indication that both Tommy and Michael were under the influence of alcohol, and possibly drugs, that night, Littleton seems to have been clean in that regard." How can anybody be that ignorant? How can anybody suggest that Ken Littleton was not "under the influence" when the voices in his lunatic head have dictated his entire life? The Sutton Report's free-flow speculation provides the opportunity to accuse anybody of the murder of Martha Moxley, but a thorough analysis identifies a single murderer, and that person is Ken Littleton. The Sutton Report is not without merit because it identified the right questions...but it has failed to answer them, and it is about time... To quote directly from the Sutton Report: "... to say, as he [Ken Littleton] has, that he didn’t even notice her [Martha Moxley] at all seems to be going too far in the other direction. She was in the house that evening on at least two occasions. By most accounts, she was very attractive and out-going. She and Tommy were cavorting very publicly by side of the house. Why wouldn’t Littleton have noticed her? If he had, what would keep him from admitting that?" These are the questions appropriately asked and not answered in the Sutton Report, the lapse is not excusable, and it's about time... Q: Why wouldn’t Littleton have noticed Martha Moxley? A: Ken Littleton needed an alibi. Q: If Ken Littleton had noticed Martha Moxley, what would keep him from admitting that?" A: The obsession to cover up the fact that bipolar sufferer, Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley. The Sutton Report accurately depicted the turmoil that governs Litttleton's life through rhetoric like: "While there is no doubt Littleton was profoundly affected by Martha Moxley’s murder and its subsequent investigation, to what end his problems can be attributed to this event is uncertain. He is a haunted man, but why? Is he somehow responsible? Is he involved in some complicity, some conspiracy? Ken Littleton is a wild card--literally and figuratively. If he is entirely innocent of any involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley, he has certainly gone to great lengths to make it seem otherwise." The claim "to what end his problems can be attributed to this event [the murder of Martha Moxley] is uncertain" is rather silly because bipolar sufferers like Ken Littleton do not compartmentalize, their entire lives are one big predictable mess. Indeed, to quote directly from the Sutton report, Ken Litleton did not have a life, he had a series of crime spree incidents. "Littleton’s crime spree on Nantucket, which he attributed to his drinking problem, brought him swiftly to the forefront of speculation in the investigation of Martha Moxley’s murder. The Greenwich Police Department’s efforts to attach the crime to Tommy Skakel had proven futile. Their focus now shifted. Defenders of Littleton insist the continued harassment of the Greenwich Police--who frequently questioned Littleton while he was working--lead to his dismissal from teaching jobs. Littleton probably did lose teaching jobs because of his status as a suspect and the Greenwich Police’s continued efforts to build a case against him, but he has only himself to blame for their interest. His foolish crimes on Nantucket were a red flag to investigators. Furthermore, to this day, he has left many questions unanswered about his actions and whereabouts on the night of October 30, 1975." Ken Littleton cleverly blames drinking problems for his "crime spree" but the truth is, a basketcase like Ken Littleton is subject to psychological disorder, alcohol is merely an aggravating factor, it is not the cause. It is difficult to imagine why the Sutton report claims that Ken Littleton is the "wild card" when he is in fact, the "wild man" who has never demonstrated the capacity to control his own life. To quote from the Sutton Report: "Again, it is difficult to sift through the real and the paranoid when listening to the voice of Ken Littleton. We must remember, he is a man with a genetic and socio-cultural predisposition to bipolar mood disorder stemming from stressful occurrences, from which he now suffers. He is also a serious alcoholic, allegedly “recovering” through the assistance of twelve-step programs. We must consider that Littleton may be a guilty man, haunted by his actions, who seeks for the sake of self-interest to protect himself by throwing speculation towards others. For all his problems and pitiable weaknesses, he is still an intelligent and potentially conniving convicted felon who has failed two lie-detector tests regarding the murder of Martha Moxley." The possibility that Littleton is a completely innocent man, merely haunted by the specter of suspicion, is absolutely not credible, because Ken Littleton now claims that he has direct knowledge of the fact that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, and that makes his obsession to manufacture an alibi the only consistent element that not only betrays Ken Littleton's inexplicable behavior but also responds to the material questions that have to be answered to be able to provide a comprehensive account about what happened to Martha Moxley. First and foremost, it is not possible to talk about Ken Littleton and crime spree in a separate breath, and the Sutton Report summarized some of the allegations in the following manner: "Unfortunately, there are many issues with regards to Ken Littleton that need further investigation and clarification before any resolution can be reached as to his possible involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley. As mentioned earlier in this section, a great number of allegations and innuendos have been made against Littleton, particularly after Greenwich Police Detectives Soloman [Solomon] and Garr recently intensified their interest in him. According to Ken, he willingly submitted to their questioning, but finally relented after it was clear he was being given “the naked light-bulb treatment.” Some of the allegations are as follows: 1) Ken Littleton had some sort of a sexual encounter with the wife of a fellow teacher from the Brunswick school at a softball picnic during the Spring of 1976. Although there were no charges brought, it has been alleged that Littleton was attempting to rape her. 2) Other somewhat similar incidents of teenaged girls bludgeoned to death are alleged to have occurred in close proximity to Littleton’s whereabouts. 3) Littleton was arrested for DWI and Assault and Battery, after having been driving the wrong way down a street frequented by prostitutes. He mumbled that 'he had to speak to the Kennedys.' " If this lunatic who is obsessed with the Kennedys, is allowed to get away with the murder of Martha Moxley, then Michael Skakel is the biggest scapegoat in the entire world, next to Lee Harvey Oswald. Clearly, Ken Littleton's troubled life would satisfy most reasonable people that he is a dangerous criminal who does not deserve to be free. To quote directly from the Sutton Report: "1) Within a year of the murder, Littleton was given and failed two polygraph tests. At first, Littleton claimed he was being represented by Tommy’s attorney, Manny Margolis, but then retained John Meerbergen. 2) After making a full confession with regards to his crime spree on Nantucket, Littleton is given a 5-7 year suspended sentence in May of 1977. He refused to submit to a sodium amytal interview regarding the murder of Martha Moxley in exchange for a reduced charge. 3) Littleton was arrested at least three times in Orlando, Florida. On February 14, 1982, his [WW] is convicted on charges of trespassing and disorderly conduct. When arrested, he gives a false name. On February 28, 1982, he is convicted of disorderly conduct again. On March 3, 1982, Littleton is convicted of shoplifting. We know he was drinking heavily at this point. 4) In subsequent years, he was arrested for numerous Driving While Intoxicated offenses. The period when Littleton was in Florida, however, is of special portent. Martha Moxley’s father, before his passing, recorded in his papers that Littleton called him at that time and expressed condolence for Martha’s death, saying he wanted to take a sodium pentathol test to help solve the case. When asked about this call by our investigator in Boston, Littleton initially denied ever speaking with Mr. Moxley. He claimed that only his wife had actually spoke [sp] to Mr. Moxley. When later confronted with the specific recollections of the call from Mr. Moxley’s personal papers, Littleton conceded he may have spoken to him while in a state of severe intoxication, stating, “Maybe I spoke to him when I was really shit-faced.” Littleton’s accusers have pointed to this incident as an indication of his guilt and need for contrition." The insanity of anybody who still defends a deranged criminal who is probably still tormenting innocent people like Martha Moxley's father, is not subject to dispute. When Ken Littleton was interviewed for the first time, he said, "He never went out that night after dinner ... he saw nothing suspicious." Today, Ken Littleton facilitates the opportunity to kill again by claiming that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley. In the final analysis, the Sutton Report is a bizarre document because it implicates Ken Littleton through fact and clears him through speculation. It is time to recognize the facts. Even the media has exposed the lunacy that governs Ken Littleton, and this is another, direct quote from the Sutton Report: "A couple of years ago, the tabloid television program, A Current Affair, ambushed Littleton in Canada for an expose-style interview. Anxious, stuttering, and shaking uncontrollably, Ken initially tried to flee the encounter, but then awkwardly relented. He made a few comments and answered some questions while remaining just barely within the realm of coherence. He is a man who suffers from severe depression and alcoholism, and his demeanor is inherently disabled. In this regard, he is his own worst accuser." In conclusion, the Sutton Report clearly indicates, that the claim that Michael or Tommy Skakel had anything to do with the murder of Martha Moxley is subject to prejudicial analysis. The claim that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley is only subject to unanswered questions. It is time to answer the questions; Ken Littleton is his own worst accuser because he murdered Martha Moxley.

Anybody have any idea where this serial killer lives now?

Anybody have any idea where this serial killer lives now?

Thanks for cheering me up.

Columbine

Re: Columbine

sorry, my report has been censored -is it that good.

Who is online