Mind Control Patent

[4911]

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,951,134.PN.&OS=PN/3,951,134&RS=PN/3,951,134">patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/n.../3,951,134</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>this is a real link to the US patent office. This thing was patented in the late 70´s...wonder what kind of things theyre building nowadays...?<br><br><br>"Apparatus for and method of sensing brain waves at a position remote from a subject whereby electromagnetic signals of different frequencies are simultaneously transmitted to the brain of the subject in which the signals interfere with one another to yield a waveform which is modulated by the subject's brain waves. The interference waveform which is representative of the brain wave activity is re-transmitted by the brain to a receiver where it is demodulated and amplified. The demodulated waveform is then displayed for visual viewing and routed to a computer for further processing and analysis. The demodulated waveform also can be used to produce a compensating signal which is transmitted back to the brain to effect a desired change in electrical activity therein." <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 8/1/06 4:18 am<br></i>

[DireStrike]

Wow. Seems to compare to a rudimentary computer. Somewhat complex inner workings to produce simple output... but when you install an operating system... And have 30 years to improve on the design... I wonder if the best model in the line doubles in power every 18 months, like computers?<br><br>But then again, combining the government and computers, the mind-control machines are probably sitting out in an office somewhere, with no password protection, and crash while in use for no particular reason. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

This is also called TV and ratings. <p></p><i></i>

[4911]

Are you implying that this kind of technology is already embedded in every television? Doesnt this strike you as more of a mind-microphone hooked to a portable empathic recording-studio hooked up to a strange kind of neural joystick for which to remote control behaviour...? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 8/1/06 5:33 pm<br></i>

[rain]

interesting analogy 4911.<br><br>I'll take a punt and suggest that that's not what HMW was implying, but simply alluding to the use of that medium to keep the general populace nicely penned.<br><br>there's a lot of problems citing someone like Springmeier, but it was handy, so -<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>EEG (Electroencephalogram) patterns co-relate to the PAS digit-span test. This allowed them to use the EEG patterns to overcome cultural bias in the test. It also gave the Monarch programmers the perfect tool to assess small children before they have verbal skills. David R. Saunders, at the Univ. of Col. working with the CIA. wrote a paper in 1961 showing the connection between alpha waves and digit span. In 1960, Mundy-Castle wrote about the connections between EEG printouts and Wechsler-Bellevue Test variables.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Here is the tip of the iceberg that EEGs were being used to determine pre-verbal personality in children. And Salvatore et al wrote at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center , Boston , Mass, clear back in 1954 about the "predictive potential of Gittinger’s theory" in an unpublished research paper. (The Massachusetts Mental Health Center was an early participant in all this.) <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The child’s guardians must teach the small victim obedience. They must teach the child to keep its eyes open and to hold still. These skills are important, because the child will be subjected to the EEGs in vast amounts. The hospital equipment would be something like an 11-channel Grass EEG machine where 11 electrodes are placed on the child’s head, and brain wave patterns are printed out charting such things as background, variability, discharges, background suppressions, sharp waves, etc. The electrodes will have designations such as T3, T4 etc. In special programming sites, a machine with electrodes will be hooked up to the child’s head for repeated tests. The newer machines accommodate up to 30 1/2 diameter pads (electrodes) which are attached with electrode adhesive tape or small needled ends to the child’s scalp. The child’s hair will be parted in an area, and the electrodes will be hooked to the skull. The attendant will tell the child, "Don’t move. Keep your eyes open. Look at this point. Don’t blink. Don’t move your body." Then this procedure will be repeated for 45 minutes to an hour. Eventually hundreds of readout from electrodes clipped to the skull of the child will chart the brain waves of the child. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>From these brain waves, the programmers can determine what type of personality the child has. This personality assessment criteria and ability is one of the guarded secrets of the programming. Should unexpected behavior crop up, the slave may be hauled in for more EEGs. The PAS tests would reveal to Gittinger what a person’s weaknesses were. The PAS shows what a person wants. And these are called the soft spots of a person’s personality. Also the PAS shows mental weaknesses, on where a person will be instable and can be broken down. Certain types of stresses will have a cumulative effect of hurting a person.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://whale.to/b/sp/f1.html">whale.to/b/sp/f1.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>wonder where they went from there?<br>(that's a rhetorical question btw)<br>from my POV, that patent is just a mere glint at the tech<br>being used.<br>and, even reading through Springmeier's (dis)information, one might notice that the assessment and practice criteria and paradigms have been applied generally, across the board, (so to speak), eg:in education, workplace/employment, etc.<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rain@rigorousintuition>rain</A> at: 8/1/06 11:47 pm<br></i>