by Joe Hillshoist » Wed Jun 21, 2006 2:26 am
Its prettyw hard to take Icke seriously for precisely the reasons you mention bvonahsen.<br><br>Sitchin too, ot Laurence Gardiner for that matter.<br><br>As someone on the blog pointed out Gardiner is a disinfo agent, whether he believes his own bullshit is another matter.<br><br>Someone on the blog also mentioned that Icke's worldview could well be the result of someone who failed to integrate his ayahuasca experiences. That makes more sense to me.<br><br>Either that or he's being deliberately metaphorical, in an effort to co opt the whorship scene.<br><br>I know someone who knew Bagwan Ranjeesh really well, apparantly. he said he could see right through him and that ranjeesh not only appreciated that but let him on the scam. Immediately.<br><br>Which was "what will it take for you idiots to think for yourselves." At what point will you realise GURU means Gargabe unlimited rubbish unlimited. And grow the fuck up.<br><br>or words to that effect.<br><br>I know other people that still worship Ranjeesh. Sheesh.<br><br>The thought of Ickeyanity makes me feel, well... ickey. urgggh<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I believe in a world that is more wonderful and mysterious than David Ickes tired fairy stories. I don't believe in a steril, lifeless scientific world either but that doesn't mean I have to accept anything anyone says at face value.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Good one, more power too ya.<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>And don't forget the Icke industry. Incorporated.<br><br>In fact the only way his story could be true was if he was a reptillian banking on the fact that no one with a brain would ever take him seriously, or at face value.<br><br>Sorry to any Icke fans out there. But think critically for a minute or two. <p></p><i></i>