by wolf pauli » Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:40 am
A term that tends to generate more heat than light, and a topic that deserves a separate thread, but FWIW, a few leads ...<br><br>toscaveritas already linked to True Torah Jews Against Zionism -- interesting group, and well worth a look. Ditto for Neturei Karta (Jews United Against Zionism) and Rabbi Goldstein:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.nkusa.org/">www.nkusa.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Norman Finkelstein's site<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/">www.normanfinkelstein.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>has lots of serious, thoroughly researched material. The recent flap with Dershowitz over Finkelstein's forthcoming book <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Beyond Chutzpah</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> is well documented there, among many other things.<br><br>Then there's Israel Shahak, Michael Neumann, Jeffrey Blankfort, et al., and of course Chomsky, who has often said he was once called a 'Zionist' and is now called an 'Anti-Zionist', <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>though his views haven't changed</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->:<br><br>"I was a Zionist activist in my youth. For me, Zionism meant <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>opposition to a Jewish state</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. The Zionist movement did not come out officially in favor of a Jewish state until 1942. Before this it was merely the intent of the Zionist leadership. The Zionist movement for a long time stood against the establishment of a Jewish state because such a state would be discriminatory and racist."<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/19970609.htm">www.chomsky.info/interviews/19970609.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <br>"Until December 1942, the Zionist movement had no formal commitment to a Jewish state. Until the state was established in May 1948, opposition to a Jewish state was within the Zionist movement. Later, the concept "Zionism" was very narrowly restricted for propaganda reasons. By the 1970s, when Israel chose expansion and dependence on the US over security and integration into the region, the concept "Zionism" was narrowed to refer, in effect, to support for the policies of the government of Israel. Thus when the distinguished Israeli Labor Party statesman Abba Eban said that the task of dialogue with the gentile world is to show that "anti-Zionists" are either anti-Semites or neurotic self-hating Jews (his examples were I.F. Stone and me), he was restricting "Zionism" to support for the state of Israel and excluding any such criticism as logically impossible. The concept "anti-Zionism" then becomes analogous to the disgraceful concept "anti-Americanism," drawn from the lexicon of totalitarianism and based on strictly totalitarian principles. By now the term has been so debased by propaganda that it is better abandoned, in my opinion."<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20040330.htm">www.chomsky.info/interviews/20040330.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Important, that last sentence, and so often overlooked. Taking the point would clear away much confusion.<br> <p></p><i></i>