by BannedfromDU » Thu Apr 06, 2006 5:30 pm
<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Workers accused of fudging ’04 recount</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Prosecutor says Cuyahoga skirted rules <br>Thursday, April 06, 2006<br>Joan Mazzolini<br>Plain Dealer Reporter <br><br>After the 2004 presidential election, Cuyahoga County election workers secretly skirted rules designed to make sure all votes were counted correctly, a special prosecutor charges. <br><br>While there is no evidence of vote fraud, the prosecutor said their efforts were aimed at avoiding an expensive - and very public - hand recount of all votes cast. Three top county elections officials have been indicted, and Erie County Prosecutor Kevin Baxter says more indictments are possible. <br><br>Michael Vu, executive director of the Cuyahoga County elections board, said workers followed procedures that had been in place for 23 years. He said board employees had no objection to doing an exhaustive hand count if needed, meaning they had no motive to break the law. <br><br>Internet bloggers have cried foul since 2004 about election results in Ohio, one of the key states in deciding the election. They have been tracking Baxter's investigation with online posts about the indictments. <br><br>Baxter's prosecution centers on Ohio's safeguards for ensuring that every vote is counted. <br><br>Baxter charges that Cuyahoga election workers - mindful of the monthlong Florida recount in 2000 - not only ignored the safeguards but worked to defeat them during Ohio's 2004 recount. <br><br>Candidates for president from the Green and Libertarian parties requested the Ohio recount. State laws and regulations specify how a recount works. <br><br>Election workers in each county are supposed to count 3 percent of the ballots by hand and by machine, randomly choosing precincts for that count. <br><br>If the hand and machine counts match, the other 97 percent of the votes are recounted by machine. If the numbers don't match, workers repeat the effort. If they still don't match exactly, the workers must complete the recount by hand, a tedious process that could take weeks and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. <br><br>But the fix was in at the Cuyahoga elections board, Baxter charges.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.cleveland.com/election/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1144312870224340.xml&coll=2">www.cleveland.com/electio...xml&coll=2</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
