Page 1 of 1

Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:33 am
by pepsified thinker
Here's the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003347326">story</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->. <br><br>So what do we know about Sullivan? <p></p><i></i>

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:45 am
by PeterofLoneTree
The first thing I thought when I read the thread "Dick is Shredding <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=6771.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...6771.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> was that Cheney might be getting ready to move. To newer quarters?<br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:38 am
by chiggerbit
<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>was that Cheney might be getting ready to move. To newer quarters?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Like his casket?<br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:19 am
by JerkyLeBoeuf
It'd be sad if he had to move so soon after completing construction on that massive underground Tunnel to Hell (for easy commuting to his Hidden Masters's headquarters) he had installed beneath his home at the taxpayer's expense.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rense.com/general50/quake.htm">www.rense.com/general50/quake.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Bush 'unhinged' according to 'consrvtv writer'

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:27 am
by chiggerbit
Andy Sullivan is a well-meaning conservative who can't admit yet that the Iraq invasion was a screwed up idea from the beginning which never had a chance to work because the underlying premise was W rong. A good guy, with good intentions, who just hasn't quite got it yet. And no, his guy Kerry wouldn't have been much better, sorry to say. But, if I had to choose between Bush being wrong and Kerry being wrong, I'll choose the nut-case Bush, thank you very much. Makes the case for the other party so much stronger. Sometimes, I think the Dems need to lose one more time, just to cement their case. I'm afraid that if the Dems win one house of Congress this time, it will just be temporary. So, let the ones who put this nut in place in the first place take some responsibility for their lack of common sense. They deserve what they get. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 11/2/06 12:38 am<br></i>

forget sully

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 3:34 am
by jingofever
I find it more notable that the same article mentions Richard Perle, all around good guy, called the administration 'dysfunctional'. Probably looking to butter up the democrats for his special brand of foreign policy. <p></p><i></i>