by robertdreed » Fri Oct 28, 2005 6:16 am
You can count me as one who is inclined toward the notion that the Wilson/Plame/Miller?Novak thing is probably jiveass.<br><br>And to realize that Patrick Fitzgerald was the prosecutor in the Sheik Abdul Rahman/1993 WTC truck bomb case...call me cynical. but...well, actually, I want to believe.But what a tangled web that trial was, with guys like Sgt. Ali Mohamed in the middle of it...who are these guys...<br><br>And I've studied the careers of the Barcellas and the Giulianis and the Russionellos and the Pat Sullivans and the Robert Muellers and all the other headline-puffed "crusaders" leading Federal investigations as "star prosecutors", building high-profile careers on pressing the cases the PTB hand them to do; taking care not to color outside of the lines; and remaining content with limiting investigations before they lead to people too high up the ladder, or too sensitive in terms of power and political influence. Yeah, you can bust a heroin ring, as long as the connections don't go much higher than a bunch of pizza outlets; you can make your mark as prosecuting shark when Edwin Wilson's cover gets blown and the covert ops boys throw him overboard; you can decide to lead the investigation of the Letelier-Moffitt murder only where George Bush's CIA shines the light for you; you can give Carlos Cabezas a wink and a handshake and send him on his way, returning his cocaine profits with a court order; you can decline to prosecute the scion of a neofascist cocaine dynasty, because they're honchos in the most "pro-US" rightist political faction in Bolivia; or you can play dumb- and unconvincingly circumspect- when asked whetheryou knew of anf funny business connected to that very unique cornerstone of transnational banking in the 1980s, BCCI...just as long as your ambitions and your institutional loyalty keep you from asking boat-rocking questions about your betters above you in the hierarchy, you can go on to respectability and even renown as a "law-and-order guy."<br><br>( Lawrence Walsh wasn't a bad prosecutor. His leash was simply too tight, mostly because of those Iran-Contra Congressional Committee gentleman's agreements that George Bush brokered as damage control.) <br><br>I hope Patrick Fitzgerald is different. I want to believe. <br><br>But my hair is bristling about the Wilson-Plame affair, because I think that's a scandal that the American public is being fed- it sounds significant, but compared to what really needs to be run down, it's tame. And the issues are tailored toward mollifying any trepidations and misgivings among CIA and intelligence personnel about the nature of the power structure they've signed on with. It has the earmarks of a prefab made-for-TV mini-series. Maybe they already have the moral of the story. And wrists will most assuredly be slapped. But that's about it. And to an objective observer, the pace will be loris-like, the revelations will pay out like fish to trained seals, and the reporting will be breathless, over what I predict will be much ado over very little. <br><br>I hope I'm wrong, though. I've been spanked for predictions before...but not that often. <br><br>Yeah, one way or the other I'm bound to get spanked...I was raving about dancing in the streets, only a few weeks ago. Well, I still hope people like me get a lot to dance about. But I don't feature it coming from the Wilson/Plame case. <br><br>Hih, sour assessment there...but I used to watch these football game practices, a field goal kicker named Brown and a place-kicker named Van Pelt...and after a while, I learned a lesson about the hazards of being persuaded to be sandbagged by one's own side. The more you agree to do it, the more they use the play. <br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/28/05 4:48 am<br></i>