Wilson and Plame: Victims or Traitors?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Of Interest.?

Postby Soulman » Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:33 pm

<br>I would be interested to learn whether the following article is of any benefit to the thread.?<br><br><br> <br>October 24, 2005 <br>Let Justice Be Done <br>Though the heavens fall… <br>by Justin Raimondo <br>Fiat justitia, ruat coelum.<br><br>"Let justice be done, though the heavens fall."<br><br>The above Latin quotation – usually attributed to Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus, a Roman statesman and Julius Caesar's father-in-law – succinctly summarizes both prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald's view of the law and the possible consequences of its application in the case of the CIA leak investigation. <br><br>In Washington, D.C., the heavens will surely fall on the heads of several prominent players, including not only the vice president's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, but also the president's top national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley; John Hannah, the vice president's chief national security adviser; and David Wurmser, the VP's chief of Middle Eastern affairs. The fate of the more high-profile Karl Rove is in some doubt: he's probably looking at obstruction of justice and/or perjury charges, but the others – including, perhaps, a number of unindicted co-conspirators – are looking at some real jail time. The number of the indicted is likely more than just these few, however, especially as rumors that Fitzgerald's investigation has widened considerably harden into near certainty. It wasn't for nothing that Fitzgerald's people posted on their brand-new Web site a letter [.pdf] from the Justice Department making clear that the special counsel has "the authority to investigate and prosecute violations of any federal criminal laws related to the underlying alleged unauthorized disclosure." This isn't just about the "outing" of deep cover CIA agent Valerie Plame anymore, if it ever truly was. Scooter-gate is about one of the biggest and most brazen lies used by this administration to drag us into an unjustified [.pdf] and reckless war: the Niger uranium forgeries.<br><br>No sooner had I written about this in my Wednesday column of last week than it was confirmed a couple of days later by MSNBC, which reported that Fitzgerald's investigation has led him to ask for the Italian parliamentary report on the Niger uranium forgeries, which, I am told, points directly at the identity of the forgers. <br><br>There are plenty of violations of federal law to be found around the Niger uranium forgeries, and I expect Fitzgerald has found most if not all of them by now. When the president made his 2003 State of the Union address, and referred to Iraq's efforts to procure uranium in "an African country," the source of his allegation was a cache of documents that had been turned over to the American embassy in Rome under mysterious circumstances. Less than a month after the president's speech, these documents were proved to be fakes, crude forgeries that could have been debunked by an amateur with a few hours to spend on Google.<br><br>Whoever forged these documents and introduced them into the American intelligence stream is guilty of violating this law:<br><br>"Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully– (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."<br><br>And this law:<br><br>"If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."<br><br>Furthermore, the conspiracy charge applies equally to the unauthorized dissemination of classified information to persons not entitled to receive it – as in the AIPAC spy case in which longtime pro-Israel lobbyist Steve Rosen, his sidekick Keith Weissman, and former Pentagon analyst Larry Franklin are charged [.pdf] with passing classified information to Israeli "diplomats." Add to this charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, and the total number of the indicted and their prospective years in the hoosegow begins to add up. What also begins to add up is the rationale for this case, which has been only vaguely understood from the very beginning (and I include myself as being among those unclear on the concept). <br><br>Until now, I have never understood why, in the name of all that's holy, Scooter and his cabal went after Valerie Plame, the wife of the man they supposedly sought revenge on. It seems remarkably petty and small-minded, even for a neocon. To begin with, they must have known that such a course was risky, and out of all proportion to its possible benefits to their cause. As much as Scooter and his pals berated the CIA for not taking enough risks, it is unlikely they would have outed Plame without having a very good reason. A hissy fit on Scooter's part doesn't quite qualify. There is, on the other hand, another possible explanation, less emotional and more cold-blooded, one that – in the context of recent developments – makes a certain amount of sense…<br><br>Remember, the forgeries were exposed in early March 2003. The New York Times published Wilson's now famous "What I Didn't Find in Africa" op-ed on July 6, 2003 – and we now know that Scooter and the gang were homing in on Wilson even before his piece appeared. We also know that Ms. Plame wasn't the only deep-cover CIA agent outed by Scooter and the Cheney-ites: she worked through a CIA front company, Brewster Jennings & Associates, engaged in anti-proliferation work, whose activities were aborted by Plame's exposure. In one fell swoop, an entire group of undercover CIA experts on nuclear weapons proliferation was neutralized. <br><br>The CIA, after all, hadn't even gotten their hands on a copy of the forgeries until February 2003 – a year after the administration began citing them as "proof" of Saddam's nuclear ambitions. It would have been well within the purview of Brewster Jennings & Associates to trace the origins of the Niger uranium documents back to the forgers: surely they weren't sitting on their hands in the months before columnist Robert Novak printed Plame's name and sparked a furor. <br><br>Everyone assumes Libby and his co-conspirators were really after Wilson, but this now seems unwarranted, especially in light of Fitzgerald's reported focus on the Niger uranium forgeries. If this question of the forgeries is now within Fitzgerald's purview, it opens up the possibility that the conspirators really were after Plame on her own account. If Plame and her associates were hot on the trail of whoever forged the Niger uranium documents, by neutralizing Brewster Jennings & Associates the Libby cabal closed one possible route to uncovering their schemes – and opened up another one. <br><br>This drama is playing out in two theaters, one domestic and the other overseas. In Washington, the heavens are falling even before Fitzgerald issues so much as a single indictment, but they're also threatening to take a tumble in the Middle East. The U.S. is ratcheting up its campaign against Syria, even as the principal proponents of confronting Damascus – Libby, Hadley, Hannah, Wurmser, et al. – find themselves in Fitzgerald's sights. In effect, the prosecutor is running a race with the War Party: can they provoke a war with Syria before he brings charges? For the sake of the country, I dearly hope Fitzgerald's staff has writer's cramp by now from furiously tapping out indictments. <br><br>The War Party has its own prosecutor, UN "investigator" Detlev Mehlis, currently trumping up charges against the next candidate for "regime change" in the Middle East: Syria. Mehlis operates under none of the constraints of the U.S. legal system that keep Fitzgerald's inquiries and the testimony before the grand jury under lock and key. The UN's grand inquisitor has published his findings midway through his investigation into the question of who killed Lebanese politician-entrepreneur Rafik Hariri. His report – here – is full of uncorroborated testimony from unknown witnesses of unknowable veracity, and in places reads more like a political polemic than a legal document. I defy anyone to read it and come to any definite conclusion other than that Lebanon is one vast snakepit we would do well to stay out of. <br><br>Yet drawing American troops into the Levant is precisely what the neocons are counting on to distract the American people from their treason, in a "wag the dog" scenario so bold it leaves one breathless. According to Joshua Landis, the respected scholar of Syrian politics and culture who resides in Damascus, the very people who fear indictments the most are behind this new push for war:<br><br>"I have it on good authority that Steven Hadley, the director of the US National Security Council, called the President of the Italian senate to asked [sic] if he had a candidate to replace Bashar al-Assad as President of Syria. The Italians were horrified. Italy is one of Syria's biggest trading partners so it seemed a reasonable place to ask! This is what Washington has been up to."<br><br>The War Party is in a hurry. Even as they prepare to take indictments and fight the charges of a conspiracy to lie us into war, the neocons and their allies in the media are laying the groundwork for the next war. We're on the Middle Eastern escalator, as I've said before: there is no way to contain the conflict we've unleashed in Iraq. Michael Ledeen, named by a former CIA operations officer as the chief conduit of the Niger uranium forgeries, continually urges this administration to go "Faster, please!" – and there are ominous indications that the foot is off the brake. The neocons know they're running a marathon, desperately trying to outrun the consequences of their own trail of deception. Will the truth catch up with Hadley, Ledeen, et al., before they can do any more damage to American interests in the Middle East – and spill more blood? <br><br>Stay tuned…<br><br>– Justin Raimondo<br><br> <br> <br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://antiwar.com/justin/">antiwar.com/justin/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>
Soulman
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Of Interest.?

Postby dbeach » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:05 pm

"I would LOVE a hero to come out of all this. America NEEDS heroes at this juncture. I just don't see Wilson/Plame in that light."<br><br>ME TOO. But Iam bettin its not hero for plame/wilson<br><br>war party is in a hurry.<br><br>when under indictment or crusing from your latest crime<br><br>START A WAR!<br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

I got out of bed to write this (I'm nuts)

Postby antiaristo » Mon Oct 24, 2005 10:57 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Leak of Agent's Name Causes Exposure of CIA Front Firm<br><br>By Walter Pincus and Mike Allen<br>Washington Post Staff Writers<br>Saturday, October 4, 2003; Page A03 <br><br>The leak of a CIA operative's name has also exposed the identity of a CIA front company, potentially expanding the damage caused by the original disclosure, Bush administration officials said yesterday. <br><br>The company's identity, Brewster-Jennings & Associates, became public because it appeared in Federal Election Commission records on a form filled out in 1999 by Valerie Plame, the case officer at the center of the controversy, when she contributed $1,000 to Al Gore's presidential primary campaign. <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>After the name of the company was broadcast yesterday, administration officials confirmed that it was a CIA front</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. They said the obscure and possibly defunct firm was listed as Plame's employer on her W-2 tax forms in 1999 when she was working undercover for the CIA.<br><br>SNIP<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The Justice Department began a formal criminal investigation of the leak Sept. 26.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Sorry to repeat, but look at that third paragraph. It's amazing.<br><br>The name of Brewster Jennings was not leaked until October 3.<br>That's one week AFTER "the Justice Department began a formal criminal investigation of the leak Sept. 26. "<br><br>And who the hell was in such a hurry to confirm the name and make damn sure the network and the people within it were destroyed?<br><br>Who were these "Bush administration officials" who CONFIRMED that Plame was working undercover for the CIA in 1999 to Pincus and Allen?<br><br>Who were these Bush administration officials who CONFIRMED the name of Brewster-Jennings to Pincus and Allen?<br><br>We've heard very little from or about Walter Pincus.<br><br>I would suggest that THIS is Fitzgerald's case.<br><br>And there is NO DOUBT THIS IS A BREACH OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT BY TWO PERSONS CONSPIRING.<br><br>I wonder who they are?<br><br>postscript<br><br>Note the parallels with the outing of David Kelly.<br>They put so many clues out there that they are bound to be found.<br>Then they confirm it when someone finds the clue (and I have to wonder who it was who found the clue?)<br> <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: I got out of bed to write this (I'm nuts)

Postby chiggerbit » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:11 pm

I keep wondering if Wolfowitz and Bolton could possibly be involved in this. Their "promotions" out of the administration--kicked upstairs?-- seemed odd to me for some reason, and I wonder if they could have been too toxic to have inside the administration once the investigation report becomes public. Pure speculation on my part, except I seem to remember reading quite awhile ago that Bolton was one of those who visited CIA dungeons a lot, seeking the "right" kind of information. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Excellent stuff Anti and others

Postby citizenspook » Mon Oct 24, 2005 11:14 pm

Anti and crew,<br><br>This thread is hot hot hot....<br><br>Thanks for the encouragement to all. The comments here resonate. TY. <br><br>Get ready for action. <br><br>stay tuned<br><br>'spook <p></p><i></i>
citizenspook
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 7:49 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Excellent stuff - and don't give up

Postby rapt » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:21 am

You are not alone Chiggerbit; I had the same strong feeling that Wolfy and Bolton were stuffed away in some cockamamie plan to isolate them from the inevitable investigation. Can't see how it would work in the real world though, since I don't think the new positions give them any immunity. Perhaps only an excuse to be ignored by the press - maybe.<br><br>Thank you from all Mr CS. We do our best but your work has been critical. It gives us power and incentive. <p></p><i></i>
rapt
 
Posts: 132
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:31 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Walter Pincus...

Postby banned » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:22 am

...is a CIA mouthpiece and always has been. <br><br>It is known. <p></p><i></i>
banned
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 5:18 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Walter Pincus...

Postby dbeach » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:47 am

banned rt on.<br>operation mockingbird is truly a cuckoo 's nest<br><br><br>"You heard about the mockingbird...."<br><br>I just got a smoking letter published on my local editorial page.<br><br>It starts with "Mr Bush is a serial liar......Stand up to the tyranny or be complicit with it...."<br><br>My pals Dad who is WW II Vet loved it.<br><br>I second the emotion.. LOTSA INSPIRATION from dis perspiration.. <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Anti, and all other RIs

Postby Peachtree Pam » Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:05 am

WILL TODAY BE THE DAY?<br><br>Now that Cheney has been named as the leaker to Libby, in a 10 p.m. edition of the NYT last night, and the blockbuster line that Cheney has testified last year under oath....what next????<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/">firedoglake.blogspot.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Don't fail to read the comments, especially those regarding "Dick Ball and Cheney" - too rich!!!! <p></p><i></i>
Peachtree Pam
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 9:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Excellent stuff Anti and others

Postby antiaristo » Tue Oct 25, 2005 7:17 am

Citizen Spook,<br>Thank you for the confirmation.<br>And thank you for your courage (doncha just love this Internet?)<br><br>Please, please, please read this thread if you want to help save the Republic<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm11.showMessage?topicID=137.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=137.topic</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Added on edit<br><br>Pam,<br>These creeps are folding like the windbags they are.<br>It's ALL intimidation. And when that doesn't work they know nothing else. <br>Don't know the when, but apart from relieving our anxiety I'm quite happy with what is happening during the pre-indictment phase. Who needs formal hearings when they're all backstabbing each other? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 10/25/05 5:23 am<br></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Excellent stuff Anti and others

Postby OnoI812 » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:15 pm

Anti- have you seen this thread at DU dealing with the NEW PINKUS WP article, the main thrust of the replies seem to deal with Wilson NEEDING to stay very public for protection...it would be very hard to change minds there.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5160972">www.democraticunderground...04x5160972</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=onoi812>OnoI812</A> at: 10/25/05 10:32 am<br></i>
OnoI812
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Excellent stuff Anti and others

Postby chiggerbit » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:21 pm

So, Tenet is suppsoed to have told Cheney about Wilson's wife? Is this why Tenet ended up out of a job later? Like to know more about timing on this. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Excellent stuff Anti and others

Postby antiaristo » Tue Oct 25, 2005 12:45 pm

Ono,<br>Just had a quick look.<br>Seems to me it's most important to tell DU that Pincus is a player.<br>HE IT WAS WHO OUTED BREWSTER JENNING IN THE WAPO.<br>If you are a member could you post the "This is Fitzgerald's case" post (you'll have to redo the link to the story) <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Cross Referencing

Postby antiaristo » Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:38 am

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>July 31, 2005/August 1, 2005 **** Plame leak damaged a major CIA investigation linking senior Bush administration officials to WMD proliferation.<br><br>U.S. intelligence insiders have pointed out that the White House is using "Rovegate" and "Who in the White House said what to whom?" as a smoke screen to divert attention away from the actual counter-proliferation work Mrs. Wilson and her Brewster Jennings & Associates team were engaged in. The arrival of Timothy Flanigan as Patrick J. Fitzgerald's boss is likely related to the mountains of evidence Fitzgerald has now collected to indict senior White House officials, particularly, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, for criminal conspiracy in exposing a sensitive U.S. intelligence operation that was targeting some of their closest political and business associates. Libby, it will be recalled, was the attorney for fugitive global smuggler and Clinton-pardoned multi-billionaire Marc Rich, someone who has close ties to the Sharon government and Israeli intelligence. It is no coincidence that FBI translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds uncovered nuclear material and narcotics trafficking involving Turkish intermediaries with ties to Israel at the same time Brewster Jennings and the CIA's Counter Proliferation Division was hot on the trail of nuclear proliferators tied to the Israeli government of Ariel Sharon and the A. Q. Khan network of Pakistan.<br><br>Feith and Libby: Ultimate targets of CIA counter-proliferation team?<br><br>Time magazine reported on July 31 that White House knew about Plame's identity long before Joseph Wilson's July 6, 2003 OP ED in the New York Times. Feith and Libby had reasons to be worried about Plame and her team's counter-proliferation work.<br><br>An arrest in early 2004 points to the links between Israeli agents and Islamist groups bent on producing weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. According to intelligence sources, this was a network that was a major focus of Edmonds' and Valerie Plame Wilson's work. In January 2004, FBI and U.S. Customs agents arrested Asher Karni, a Hungarian-born Orthodox Jew, Israeli citizen, and resident of Cape Town, South Africa, at Denver International Airport for illegally exporting 200 electrically triggered spark gaps -- devices that send synchronized electrical pulses and are used in nuclear weapons...<br><br><br>So now we have Libby, Rove and Cheney, implicated in a plot to burn a CIA anti-proliferation network working to collect evidence and follow the money in an arms sales ring that had ties to the Bush administration. It is important to note that the leak to Novak that outed Ms. Wilson was only part of the Novack story. I don't see too many people discussing the followup story that Novak wrote a week later that outed Ms. Wilson's cover operation, Brewster Jennings and burned her whole undercover network.<br><br><br>...what is clear is that an Israeli-based network, involving key neo-conservatives in the Bush adminstration, were attempting to speed up the clock on the delivery by the A. Q. Khan network of prohibited nuclear material to countries like Iran, thereby justifying a pre-emptive U.S. (and Israeli-supported) attack on Iranian nuclear installations. It was this network that attracted the attention of the CIA and when it realized some of the "men behind the curtain" were in the Pentagon, they had their smoking gun evidence of double dealing by Bush administration officials and their compatriots in the Sharon government.<br>[...]<br>A Malaysian link was also discovered in Karni’s network, which is significant in light of developments involving Brewster Jennings' exposure by Rove and Libby. A Swiss citizen named Urs Tinner was arrested by German authorities in October 2004. Tinner was accused of supervising the manfucture of centrifuge components in Malaysia. The United States demanded Tinner’s release, which led to speculation that Tinner was a U.S. intelligence asset who penetrated the A.Q. Khan network and may have been part of the Brewster Jennings operation.<br><br>Now this story is almost as hard to follow in print as it was on the radio, but if the evidence is leading Fitzgerald to consider this as one of the motives for the outing of Ms. Wilson and Brewster Jennings this could turn out to be bigger than any of us may have imagined. Add to this the possibility of Fitgerald looking into whether the Bush administration lied to congress in the run-up to the war and we may be in for a real shitstorm if he's able to connect all the dots.<br><br>progressivereaction.blogs...r- jennings.html<br>Sangemon | Homepage | 10.25.05 - 10:42 pm | #<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br><br>Now as you can imagine I was delighted to see a reminder of the ultimate reality underlying this affair - AQ Khan and his proliferation activities.<br>But what REALLY piqued my interest is the bolded comment. I have been saying that the real leak of substance was the identity of Brewster-Jennings into the pages of the Washington Post on October 4 2003. This seemed to be saying it had happened much earlier, on or around 21 July 2003.<br>So I Checked, and this is what I found<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The Wilsons for Gore<br>On the same day in 1999 that retired diplomat Joseph Wilson was returned $1,000 of $2,000 he contributed to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore a month earlier because it exceeded the federal li<br>Oct 4, 2003<br>by Robert Novak ( bio | archive )<br><br>WASHINGTON -- On the same day in 1999 that retired diplomat Joseph Wilson was returned $1,000 of $2,000 he contributed to Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore a month earlier because it exceeded the federal limit, his CIA-employee wife gave $1,000 to Gore using a fictitious identification for herself.<br><br>In making her April 22, 1999, contribution, Valerie E. Wilson identified herself as an "analyst" with "Brewster-Jennings & Associates." No such firm is listed anywhere, but the late Brewster Jennings was president of Socony-Vacuum oil company a half-century ago. Any CIA employee working under "non-official cover" always is listed with a real firm, but never an imaginary one. <br><br>A footnote: In July when he revealed himself as author of a report commissioned by the CIA, Wilson sought a book agent. After being turned down by a prominent agent, he has now found one.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>www.townhall.com/opinion/...68651.html<br><br>First, the date. October 4 2003 is the same date as the Pincus/Allen piece in the Washington Post sourced to two "Bush administration officials". <br><br>Second, Novak is spinning it to support a contention that he was unaware that Plame was undercover, which seems tailored to a defence against the IIPA.<br><br>Third, Wilson was seeking a book deal even before the most sensitive information had leaked.<br><br>I am more convinced now than ever that the leak of substance took place in the WaPo of October 4. If you compare the Pincus/Allen to the guidelines laid down for prosecution under 18 USC 793/4 in USSC Morison it is clear the Espionage Act was broken. It is also clear that severe damage was done to Brewster-Jennings (those eight redacted pages) and the CIA (that anonymous star).<br><br>If that is true Fitz has had his case on ice for ages. He has a conspiracy to breach the Espionage Act on behalf of two "Bush administration officials". A death penalty case.<br><br>But the legal doctrine for conspiracy is that ALL are responsible for the outcome. I suspect the bulk of Fitz's efforts have been to tie OTHERS to the conspiracy he has already demonstrated. All that "who said what to whom" is not about proving his case. He's already done that. It's about tying everone from Bush down to that really nasty conspiracy that took place on October 4.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cross Referencing

Postby dbeach » Wed Oct 26, 2005 10:09 am

progressivereaction.blogs...r- jennings.html<br> <br><br>www.townhall.com/opinion/...68651.html<br><br><br>ANTI Links please..also if ya psot some brief comments at CS blog.. <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Plame Investigation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest