by antiaristo » Tue May 23, 2006 8:53 pm
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>the 1946 Federal Rules of Criminal Prosecution, which 4th rule was held to mean that the sole authority of the Grand Jury's Presentment independent of an Indictment was rendered 'obsolete'. As Citizen Spook shows us, 'obsolete' does NOT mean 'null-and-void' -- since that would constitute a law or ruling to reverse statute. Through official statute and Supreme Court official's own rulings, Citizen Spook shows us that the original and CONTINUING by-law intent of the Grand Jury was to be a duly-authorized and fully-empanneled 4th branch of Government that has sole discretionary authority -- it doesn't depend on the officers of Court to follow an investigation where it leads or to require a trial.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Right you are, Starman.<br>But the trouble is that they have introduced an element of uncertainty, an element of doubt, haven't they?<br><br>And where there is doubt, the powerful will always prevail.<br><br>That's why they create so much doubt, in so many areas.<br>Behind the smokescreen, issues are being settled not on the basis of logic and law, but on the basis of who is in a position to kill whom.<br><br>That's how far we've regressed.<br><br>We've been hearing rumblings about impeaching the President.<br>Do you know where you got impeachment from?<br><br>It comes from England, from the English common law.<br><br>Since the invasion of Iraq there have been a few efforts at impeaching Tony Blair.<br><br>They got nowhere.<br><br>We have been told that impeachment is "obsolete".<br>The English common law, obsolete?<br><br>That ruling is made by the Speaker of the House of Commons.<br>The Speaker got his name for speaking to the King on behalf of the Members of the House of Commons. He was the "workplace representative".<br><br>But like so many other ways, the Queen has used her powers under the Treason Felony Act to reverse a natural function.<br><br>The Speaker now acts as enforcer, keeping Members in line, on behalf of the Crown. He manages the Order of Business, and no impeachment motions are allowed<br><br>For example, Sinn Fein Members are NOT ALLOWED to take up their seats on behalf of their electorate. Because they refuse to swear an oath of absolute obedience to Queen Elizabeth.<br><br>That is enforced by Michael Martin, the Speaker.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Martin was born in <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Glasgow, Scotland</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, in 1945, the son of a merchant seaman and a school cleaner. He attended St. Patrick's Boys School in Anderston, before leaving at the age of 15 to become an apprentice sheet-metal worker. He became involved in the Sheet Metal Workers trade union and joined the Labour Party when he was 21. He later worked in the Rolls Royce plant at Hillington, and was an AUEW shop steward from 1970 to 1974.<br><br>In 1973, Martin was elected as a councillor on Glasgow Corporation — a position he retained until he was elected to the UK Parliament. He also served as a trade union organiser with the National Union of Public Employees (NUPE) between 1976 and 1979. He was elected as MP for Glasgow Springburn in the 1979 general election, and was associated with the right-wing of the party. He was a supporter of Roy Hattersley and <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Denis Healey, whom he served as a Parliamentary Private Secretary from 1980 until 1983</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->.<br><br>Denis Healey, leading light of Bilderberg.<br><br>I'm not trying to hijack the thread.<br>But the rules are not being followed.<br><br>In your country, just like mine.<br><br>They've honed these techniques in England by manipulating the English common law.<br><br>America's legal system is based on English (not British) common law.<br><br>Those same techniques will work over there.<br><br>Added on edit<br><br>I have to put this here.<br>I've just had a quick look at The Huffington Post<br><br>The headline?<br><br><br><!--EZCODE CENTER START--><div style="text-align:center"><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:medium;">Laura Bush vs. Karl Rove On Gay Marriage…</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--></div><!--EZCODE CENTER END--><br><br><br>Oh America!<br><br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 5/23/06 7:09 pm<br></i>