by FourthBase » Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:49 am
I thought that the government and Zapruder's family had negotiated a purchase for the film, for like $16 million dollars, but then I read Henry Zapruder's obituary:<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-zapruderob_26met.ART.West.Edition2.18924b11.html">www.dallasnews.com/shared...24b11.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Henry Zapruder was a nationally respected tax attorney, said his son, Matthew Zapruder of New York.<br><br>"One of the very small parts of his life was that he had to do with the administration of the film for a while," his son said. "He was responsible for dealing with the film <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>until the government seized it by eminent domain</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> several years ago.<br><br>"He administered it with extraordinary delicacy and he never allowed commercial use of the film, only artistic or research use," his son said. "It was never on any T-shirts or anything. He was very sensitive and kind of low-keyed about it."<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Did I have things confused before?<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=fourthbase>FourthBase</A> at: 2/12/06 2:49 am<br></i>