by sunny » Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:45 pm
NewKid, none that I know of.<br><br>But here is something bizarre. Dan Moldea wrote a book on the assassination several years ago, (can't recall the title right now) For nearly the entire book, he <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>convinces</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> the reader, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Thane Cesar (sp?)was the shooter, not only because of the correlation of the position of Kennedy's wound and the position of Cesar, but documents many nefarious connections of Cesar to shadowy figures. Then, suddenly, at the end of the book, he declares Sirhan to be the shooter, tho part of a conspiracy of some sort. The transition was shocking and suspicious. One can't help but come away with the impression that he was some how intimidated into that conclusion.<br><br>-edited to correct spelling <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sunny@rigorousintuition>sunny</A> at: 3/16/06 9:47 am<br></i>