Page 1 of 1

13th Parole Denial for Sirhan Sirhan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:33 am
by Gouda
<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/15/sirhan.parole.ap/index.html">edition.cnn.com/2006/LAW/...index.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Robert Kennedy's killer again denied parole<br><br>FRESNO, California (AP) -- Sirhan Sirhan, who shot Robert F. Kennedy to death in 1968, was denied parole Wednesday for the 13th time since his conviction.<br><br>Sirhan is "very hostile. He hates Americans. ... He continues to pose a risk to public safety," said state Board of Parole Hearings spokesman Tip Kindel.<br><br>Sirhan did not attend the hearing at Corcoran State Prison or appoint a lawyer to represent him. His longtime attorney died last year after numerous failed attempts to get his client a new trial.<br><br>Sirhan also did not appear at his last hearing in 2003. Periodic hearings are guaranteed by law. Sirhan's next parole hearing will be in 2011.<br><br>Kennedy was shot in the narrow pantry of Los Angeles' Ambassador Hotel on June 5, 1968, soon after the New York senator claimed victory in the California presidential primary.<br><br>Sirhan was wrestled to the ground with the gun in his hand.<br><br>Prosecutors at Sirhan's trial said the Palestinian immigrant targeted Kennedy because of his pledge to sell fighter jets to Israel.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Sirhan blurted out in court that he killed the senator "premeditatedly with 20 years of malice aforethought," but later insisted he did not remember the incident.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>

'premeditatedly with 20 years of malice aforethought'

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:44 am
by Rigorous Intuition
That certainly rolls off the tongue naturally, huh? Oh, and he was 24 when RFK was murdered.<br><br>MP3 <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=8965&page=2&type=">here</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> of Lawrence Teeter, the first attorney Sirhan had who was persuaded of his innocence, who died last year.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.jfk-info.com/diary1.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>

edit

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:02 pm
by sw
edit

Re: NIBIN

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:25 pm
by Rigorous Intuition
There were more bullets and more bullet holes than could be accounted for by Sirhan's gun. (The LAPD took care of the bullet holes, by tearing out the evidentiary molding and destroying it.) Kennedy's fatal wound was point blank from the rear with an upward trajectory, while Sirhan was standing directly in front and not nearly close enough to leave powderburns. And the chain of possession of the ballistics was horribly and almost certainly intentionally botched early in the proceedings. None of it mattered with a mind-controlled patsy who would blurt out confessions without knowing what he was saying.<br><br>It's monstrously sinister. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: NIBIN

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:33 pm
by NewKid
Are there any remotely serious arguments by people who've studied the case that it really was Sirhan and wasn't a conspiracy? Any 'debunkings' worth a shit out there? <p></p><i></i>

Re: NIBIN

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:45 pm
by sunny
NewKid, none that I know of.<br><br>But here is something bizarre. Dan Moldea wrote a book on the assassination several years ago, (can't recall the title right now) For nearly the entire book, he <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>convinces</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> the reader, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Thane Cesar (sp?)was the shooter, not only because of the correlation of the position of Kennedy's wound and the position of Cesar, but documents many nefarious connections of Cesar to shadowy figures. Then, suddenly, at the end of the book, he declares Sirhan to be the shooter, tho part of a conspiracy of some sort. The transition was shocking and suspicious. One can't help but come away with the impression that he was some how intimidated into that conclusion.<br><br>-edited to correct spelling <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sunny@rigorousintuition>sunny</A> at: 3/16/06 9:47 am<br></i>

Re: 'malice aforethought' but by someone else.

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:33 pm
by Hugh Manatee Wins
<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://realhistoryarchives.blogspot.com/2006/03/pantry-preserved.html">realhistoryarchives.blogs...erved.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>About Me<br><br> Name:Lisa Pease <br> Location:Los Angeles, California, United States <br><br>I've been a lifelong activist for progressive causes, as well as a writer/researcher on the assassinations of the Sixties (see The Assassinations). I have a passion for justice and the truth is my religion. I believe, as the late, great Gary Webb once said, "A journalist is, and must be, a revolutionary." <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Reader comment-<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I just found a vinyl record with sounds and interviews with witnesses to the RFK assassination.<br><br>It is called 'Y' and is on Solar Records - SLP-331<br>produced by Doug Moody.<br><br>The record includes an interview with Coroner Dr. Thomas Noguchi. Noguchi says the fatal wound was from point-blank at the right rear of RFK's head. That's where RFK's 'body guard' was, not Sirhan Sirhan. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Dr. Noguchi was not allowed to testify at Sirhan's show trial.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> When examined, Sirhan showed evidence of being hypnotised and programmed to be at the place and time of the murder and this made him a patsy. But he was used as a pawn by the real killers.<br><br>Once RFK became THE Democratic presidential candidate he would have gotten Secret Service protection and tried to roll back the CIA who hijacked our government and killed JFK when he resisted.<br><br>Almost all evidence of the RFK murder meant to continue the original crime of CIA-theft of our government has been destroyed.<br><br>And here I find in a used record shop evidence of one of the greatest crimes against the American people.<br><br>Keep your eyes open and save what you can for posterity. They are going to need all the clues they can get about what they are up against.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=hughmanateewins>Hugh Manatee Wins</A> at: 3/16/06 12:37 pm<br></i>

Sirhan

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:45 pm
by Col Quisp
It doesn't help that the governor of California is related to RFK by marriage. As if Sirhan will ever see the light of day. Talk about a patsy!<br> <p></p><i></i>

Re: Bride of Gropenfuhrer

PostPosted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:07 pm
by Hugh Manatee Wins
OMFG. You are so right.<br><br>Maria Shriver held hostage by the...Thing That Ate America.<br><br>The annihilation of Camelot had to be perpetuated.<br>"...so they locked the princess high in a tower with one of the king's henchman looking after her."<br><br>brrrr, <p></p><i></i>

Re: 13th Parole Denial for Sirhan Sirhan

PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:26 pm
by brainpanhandler

Re: 13th Parole Denial for Sirhan Sirhan

PostPosted: Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:03 am
by Grizzly
Fuck, that was depressing. ..Above. But appreciated.