by robertdreed » Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:21 am
I believe in adult free choice for access to drugs, as a matter of principle.<br><br>I abhor mandatory drugging of children. <br><br>I abhor the advertising of pharmaceutical drugs on the televison set. It's patently absurd (get it?) to seriously contend that it's possible to get responsible drug education from a television advertisement. And "ask your doctor for this med by brand name" ads are so irresponsible that they should probably best be banned, like liquor ads. <br><br>I abhor the practice of drug companies rewarding doctors on the basis of the volume of brand-name medications they prescribe; or for offering material rewards and honorariums in return for endorsements of pharmaceutical drugs. <br><br>I'm wary of the use of psychotropic drugs on developing nervous systems- even coffee and pot, which appear to me to be a good deal less profound in their effects than the stimulants, tricyclics, quadcyclics, and serotonergic antidepressants commonly prescribed to children and adolescents at the drop of a hat, these days. <br><br>I abhor having free choice restricted so that cannabis is not available as an option to lower blood pressure, an aid to digestion, to cure erectile dysfunction, as an appetitie stimulant, as an antidepressant, or any of the other multitude of other medical uses that it typically performs with fewer toxic physical effects than pharamceutical drugs.<br><br>I support the loosening of prescription restrictions for various mild to moderate opiate preparations, particularly for those in chronic pain, and the elderly.<br><br>I support research into the use of opiates for their value as antipsychotic drugs. Consider the principal drawbacks of "antipsychotics"- they have such horrible side effects that it's difficult to get schizophrenics to keep taking them. What's up with that? I know how to encourage those folks to keep taking their anti-anxiety meds...seriously, would someone kindly critique this Modest Proposal of mine? <br><br>I support having a much wider array of pharmaceutical drugs available OTC in the USA, just as they have been for decades in other countries like India and Mexico, with negligible social costs or public health impact (provided that they're not counterfeit.) Why not? <br><br>I'm wary of using any drug prescribed for daily use in a way that produces habitual dependency, whether it be antidepressants, tranquilzers, sleep aids, blood pressure medications, stimulants, or many of the array of medications piled one on top of the other and given to the elderly. I contend that cannabis is less toxic and less habit-forming than any of the pharmaceutical drugs that I've named. <br><br>I think it's ridiculous to consider one class of habit-forming drugs "addictive" and the other as simply "perilous to ever stop taking", simply because the "addictive" ones tend to make people feel euphoric and the others don't. <br><br>If I'm lying immobile in a bed as a debilitated elderly senior citizen, I'd rather spend that time dreaming out on opium or morphine than simply wait out my days in a state of officially enforced "sobriety." At present, I have no use for opiates. But once I'm permanently bedridden and senescent, what possible difference could it make, to myself or anyone else, if I'm floating in the arms of Morpheus? Just add it to my daily drug cocktail- the one that I can't do without anyway...I'll be a nicer person to be around...all the time in the world to put the headphones on, and treat myself to a music appreciation course....Actually, I'll probably prefer hashish. Considering that I'll be suffering from it's principal negative side effects- lethargy and torpor- anyway...where's the downside? <br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/6/05 12:46 am<br></i>