rigorousintuition.ca

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:05 pm**

The answer provided in the following article may surprise even many of you, both. View the original article at <a href="http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_journal_of_degenerative_diseases.htm">www.newmediaexplorer.org/...seases.htm</a> for working embedded links and for links to related articles. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative Diseases AIDS is a US government operation directed towards population control, which springs from secret research into disease causing agents conducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view of Donald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal of Degenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available for download here by Progressive Convergence, the 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent medical history more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott has delved deeply into the paper trail left by what seems to be a government funded effort to develop disabling diseases and to find ways to transmit these to a target population, time coincident with the appearance of "AIDS" on the world scene. We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about "Viral infections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiency states", about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy into spontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratory disease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefeller sponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish for wasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a polio vaccine and "lost his records". Belgian and Portuguese research that completed what US scientists were finding and a small pox eradication campaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent to get to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo is of course a king pin, linking the Nixon "war on cancer" research program with the eventual appearance of AIDS. I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few of the highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and it appears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story in all its gory detail. That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by Boyd Graves, who has been researching the matter independently. His timeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he says became AIDS is available here, while his flow chart and other publications can be had for a fee. Alan Cantwell is another author who states that there were efforts to develop an illness concurrent with the appearance of AIDS on the world scene. See: The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980: The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic - - -  What really causes Aids? Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a government program, that is, whether the program was successful and is now in full swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the result of an accidentally "escaped" bioweaponized swine fever virus is immaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still have some doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about the mechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying that yes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a virus, but what about the abundant data that shows - HIV was never properly isolated - HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of 'infected' victims to explain the damage done - there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV - AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing the patient rather than the virus. Read about the history of AZT - article by Beldeu Singh - those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthen their own immune system by proper nutrition and other natural intervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress to those 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS. All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV may have nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS and that most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is so ardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure at all, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. Peter Barry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he said: "Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue in history, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals and conservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step march toward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigm worldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this sounds like an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objective of policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on the planet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive with antiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if their mothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy and guaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power and authority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including the belief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategy that is now completely operant at every level of public policy around the world." Genocide or accident? Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceutical genocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? We just can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far. So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky history of what seems to have been a government program with destructive intent. One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any truth to the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit. Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier HIV, or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by which that viral agent or that particular combination causes the destruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know what went on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decade and a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS. But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die from no treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We should concentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation of the patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and other nutrients as advocated by Harold Foster, a silver colloid patented in the US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, a multivitamin, or simply bettering the standard of living and the diet of people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter. Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's not poison the patient in the meantime, please. But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent the next hyped up epidemic. As I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation, here a discussion of it from a recent email:  Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan Campbell I came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When I first started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrified with the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then spread to San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first AIDS patients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera, suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay men traveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had no idea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYC for a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer that claimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured in Haiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war against Cuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This was substantiated by an article several years later, citing that the US had sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wild pig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There were other articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekas that they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS, clusters of AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants had smuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire among pigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time in Africa. There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's new retrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent among men who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent in green monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy about the use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangered species. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facing extinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it turned out, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virus research. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as the culture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding green monkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried out on wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of them probably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what would happen, since Haiti was considered expendable. The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual, Haitian people became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that is). I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting this historical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of the green monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patients and declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not mean virulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC, led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak, lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986, faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop an alternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold Spring Harbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyone working on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternative researchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug, was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of its efficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was the first-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the "cause" of AIDS. If what I have stated above is true, what we have is the possibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological warfare. The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg - those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believe that AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim - and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is caused by toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing countries it is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of mundane causes - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, known diseases of poverty. See also: The Linking Pathogen In Neuro-systemic Diseases: CHRONIC FATIGUE, ALZHEIMER'S, PARKINSON'S & MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS Donald Scott is a retired high school teacher and university professor who is currently president of the Common Cause Medical Research Foundation and adjunct professor of the Institute of Molecular Medicine. He has extensively researched neurosystemic degenerative diseases over the past five years and has authored many documents on the relationship between degenerative diseases and a pathogenic mycoplasma called Mycoplasma fermentans. New Book: Unraveling AIDS The Independent Science and Promising Alternative Therapies Mae-Wan Ho, Sam Burcher, Rhea Gala and Vejko Velkovic "This book delves into the nutritional and other lifestyle factors that establish the biological milieu for AIDS, and perhaps is at the very root of the expression of the disease." Henry A. Becker, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada posted by Sepp Hasslberger on Saturday September 24 2005 updated on Friday December 16 2005<hr></blockquote>

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2006 4:09 pm**

The special edition of the Journal of Degenerative Diseases called "AIDS: Made in America" can be downloaded here: <a href="http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdf">www.progressiveconvergenc...urv5n3.pdf</a>

Posted: **Mon Jan 02, 2006 5:11 pm**

I'm about a third of the way through this report. It is either masterful disinformation, or an incredible smoking gun. Anyone with a medical background please check this document out for accuracy or any warnings of "monkeying" with the data. Assuming it is accurate, it is an unhappy read, for sure. It posits a connection directly among Nelson Rockefeller and the development of AIDS. It suggests that two of the scientists involved in the development of AIDS (I don't say AIDS virus because it's far more complex than that and I don't claim to understand it all) actually lent their initials to a secret program of "cancer research" with a code name beginning "MK". It then says Rockefeller oversaw MK-Ultra (I'm embarrassed to say I don't know if that's accurate. Do others?) It suggests that MK-ULTRA, as an umbrella program, hosted all kinds of programs not directly related to "brainwashing" including, perhaps, the MK program to develop these pathogens leading to AIDS and also Chronic fatigue. I have to stop reading for now, and I'm still left wondering why such a slow acting disease would be the chosen vehicle for this, but the point of the article is that this was an intentional program of "population reduction" by eugenicist zealot Nelson Rockefeller. As many know, looking into "population reduction" schemes and propaganda designed to acclimate us to the "sad inevitability" of a population collapse (can ANYONE argue that inflicting AIDS is somehow more "humane" than allowing the collapse to occur on its own?) has been an interest of mine. Indeed, we see certain strains of New Age thought almost gleefully awaiting such a collapse. I'm also rather unhappy having a wife who is both DID (as subject of interest within MKULTRA) and also suffers from what has been diagnosed as "rheumatoid arthritis". She does not have the RA indicator in her blood, so the diagnosis is merely based on symptoms. Since RA is an autoimmune disease, and since much of her physical symptoms resemble chronic fatigue as well as RA, I'm just not real happy thinking about any of it. I have no indication that she's been subjected to any "outside tinkering" and so far, all her abuse memories are painful but related to abusive parents, but still, there is so much mystery in why she is continually incapacitated both physically and mentally. As much as I believe in the possibilities of things such as those described in this document, I would very much welcome a good debunking of this organization or the authors of this article. So, feel free, anyone, to find out that these guys are totally illegitimate and the science in the article completely bogus.

rigorousintuition.ca

AIDS: Biowarfare or Hoax

AIDS: Biowarfare or Hoax

Re: AIDS: Biowarfare or Hoax

Re: AIDS: Biowarfare or Hoax