Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby darkbeforedawn » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:13 pm

<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=medical_marijuana_s_catch_22&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1&ref=rss">blog.sciam.com/index.php?...=1&ref=rss</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>April 21, 2006<br><br>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>11:50:10 am, Categories: Medicine, Politics and Science, 818 words <br><br>Medical Marijuana's Catch-22 <br>Yesterday the Food and Drug Administration issued a statement reaffirming its opposition to the medical use of marijuana, declaring that "no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use. There are alternative FDA-approved medications in existence for treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana." This, despite the existence of a 1999 report by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, which concluded that marijuana was "moderately well suited for particular conditions, such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and AIDS wasting." As the New York Times notes in its front-page coverage:<br><br>Dr. John Benson, co-chairman of the Institute of Medicine committee that examined the research into marijuana's effects, said in an interview that the statement on Thursday and the combined review by other agencies were wrong.<br><br>The federal government "loves to ignore our report," said Dr. Benson, a professor of internal medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. "They would rather it never happened."<br><br>Some scientists and legislators said the agency's statement about marijuana demonstrated that politics had trumped science.<br><br>[More:]<br><br>(Forgive a digression: that last paragraph made me laugh. How many times in recent years have science reporters had to write some version of that sentence? "Some scientists and legislators said the [WHITE HOUSE/FEDERAL AGENCY]'s statement about [SUBJECT] demonstrated that politics had trumped science" ought to be a Word macro.)<br><br>I'm not going to pick a fight with the FDA's need to prevent anyone from circumventing its authority to test and regulate the availability of therapies. I'm also not going to argue about whether medical marijuana programs inevitably ease recreational access to pot, and whether that's a bad thing. (Attention, NORML: please spare me the missives about wondrous, wondrous hemp and its infinite uses.)<br><br>What is completely wrong about the FDA's position, however, is that in effect it continues to impede not just the medical use of marijuana but also medical research on marijuana, which could lead to superior therapies that don't involve smoking or getting high at all.<br><br>Back in December 2004, SciAm published "The Brain's Own Marijuana," by Roger A. Nicoll and Bradley N. Alger (you can read the entire text here). The article's deck tells the tale: "Research into natural chemicals that mimic marijuana's effects in the brain could help to explain--and suggest treatments for--pain, anxiety, eating disorders, phobias and other conditions." The SA Perspectives that month argued with the tight federal restrictions that limited the advance of that research:<br><br>Yet outdated regulations and attitudes thwart legitimate research with marijuana. Indeed, American biomedical researchers can more easily acquire and investigate cocaine. Marijuana is classified as a so-called Schedule 1 drug, alongside LSD and heroin. As such, it is defined as being potentially addictive and having no medical use, which under the circumstances becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.<br><br>Any researcher attempting to study marijuana must obtain it through the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). The U.S. research crop, grown at a single facility, is regarded as less potent--and therefore less medicinally interesting--than the marijuana often easily available on the street. Thus, the legal supply is a poor vehicle for studying the approximately 60 cannabinoids that might have medical applications.<br><br>...<br><br>The reasonable course is to make it easier for American researchers to at least examine marijuana for possible medical benefits. Great Britain, no slacker in the war on drugs, takes this approach: the government has authorized a pharmaceutical firm to grow different strains of marijuana for clinical trials.<br><br>This call for marijuana research is not a closet campaign for drug legalization--easing research barriers would not require that marijuana be reclassified, nor would it have any bearing on individual states' decisions to approve limited use of medical marijuana. As a 1995 editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association said, "We are not asking readers for immediate agreement with our affirmation that marijuana is medically useful, but we hope they will do more to encourage open and legal exploration of its potential." After almost a decade of little progress, we reiterate that sentiment.<br><br>And now we have to reiterate it again. Medical marijuana is caught in a classic Catch-22 situation: It is banned because the federal government dismisses the evidence of therapeutic benefit as insufficient. But because marijuana is banned, scientists can't easily gather more evidence to make the case. And new drugs based on marijuana are casualties of the same policies. Meanwhile, patients continue to suffer despite strong evidence that work in this area could lead to better medicines.<br><br>How does this seem like a good arrangement? Seriously, what are the feds smoking?<br><br>Update (4/24): Steve Mirsky reminds me that the second episode (Feb. 15) of Science Talk, the Scientific American podcast, features an interview with Bruce Mirken, director of communications for the Marijuana Policy Project. <br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
darkbeforedawn
 

Re: Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby stickdog99 » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:33 pm

1) Hemp is very useful and can be used as a cash crop to sustain a lot of unskilled small farmers. This would drive up labor costs and drive down the costs of competing non-hemp goods.<br><br>2) Hemp is very medicinal. This would drive down demand for prescription drugs.<br><br>3) Pot is readily grown and sold under the table in small amounts. This would drive down the tax-base as well as increase the number of less traceable cash transactions. <br><br>4) Smoking pot helps people see through lies, especially the kind of lies used to divide the have-nots against each other with hate. <p></p><i></i>
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6328
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Legalize it, time to recognize it

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:43 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/images/smilies/bf_rasta.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br><br><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="color:teal;font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:x-small;"><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em> <br><br>Just gimme di trees and mek we smoke it yo (Smoke it yo!) <br>It a mek we peace so dont provoke it yo (Voke it yo!) <br>We nuh need nuh speed so we nah nuh coke it yo (Coke it yo!) <br>Set yuh mind at ease we gotta take it slow <br><br>So when yuh see di S.P. floatin dont provoke him <br>Cau di weed weh we smokin need fi soakin <br>Fastin fi di medication, and di best hygrade a Jamaican <br>When we a bun a weed we supportin and promotin <br>Lau di crack and di coke ting yeah we smoking <br>Herb a di healin of di nation <br>Legalize it right now we gwaan blaze one <br><br>Everyday, we be burnin not concernin what nobody wanna say <br>We be earnin dollars turning cau we mind deh pon we pay <br>Some got gold and all dem diamonds all we got is Mary J <br>Legalize it, time to recognize it <br><br>This purple haze it mek mi crazy <br>Mek mi write new tune yeah dats what pays me <br>Cau dat not di only occupation <br>Goin to get some I give yuh medication <br>When a farmer grows it he knows to close it <br>Economical benefit help fi those who a fi deh yah pon di hard jugglin <br>Cau di system only keep man struggling <br>Studyin people a use it dont abuse it <br>Cau di concentration well reputed <br>Dats why herb man dem a di wise one <br>And it found on di grave of King Solomon <br>And it good fi di eye sight and di chest sight <br>And it give yuh nuff inside just gimme di light <br>And, mek we blaze it we should a neva waste it <br><br>Again, we be burnin not concernin what nobody wanna say <br>We be earnin dollars turning cau we mind deh pon we pay <br>Some got gold and all dem diamonds all we got is Mary J <br>Legalize it, time to recognize it <br><br>Just gimme di trees and mek we smoke it yo (Smoke it yo!) <br>It a mek we peace so dont provoke it yo (Voke it yo!) <br>We nuh need nuh speed so we nah nuh coke it yo (Coke itr yo!) <br>Set yuh mind at ease we gotta take it slow <br><br>So when yuh see di S.P. floatin dont provoke him <br>Cau di weed weh we smokin need fi soakin <br>Fastin fi di medication, and di best hygrade a Jamaican <br>Cau we know it as a great ting no debatin <br>While incarceratin true dem hatin <br>Cau dem dont waan see we a remain calm <br>Even though dem condemn (?) <br><br>Again, we be burnin not concernin what nobody wanna say <br>We be earnin dollars turning cau we mind deh pon we pay <br>Some got gold and all dem diamonds all we got is Mary J <br>Legalize it, time to recognize it <br>Again, we be burnin not concernin what nobody wanna say <br>We be earnin dollars turning cau we mind deh pon we pay <br>Some got gold and all dem diamonds all we got is Mary J <br>Legalize it, time to recognize it<br><br>Sean Paul<br></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></span><!--EZCODE FONT END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=seemslikeadream@rigorousintuition>seemslikeadream</A> at: 4/26/06 5:43 pm<br></i>
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Why?

Postby antiaristo » Wed Apr 26, 2006 7:55 pm

Because it's good for you.<br>And you can give up alcohol and nicotine.<br>And learn your true potential. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why?

Postby thoughtographer » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:04 pm

To borrow a phrase from a good friend of mine: "it works". <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>
thoughtographer
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 12:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby StarmanSkye » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:37 pm

... and in addition, criminalizing Pot has shown its usefulness in terms of potential for blackmail, to coerce informant sources and legal testimony (and perjury as needed), and to help keep the lucrative money-machine of courts, the prison-industry and the Drug-war 'business' (ie., interdiction, surveillance, eradication, and profits of protected crime) going;<br><br>There's an enormous voume of anecdotal evidence that marijuanna is MUCH more beneficial and cheap (ie., homegrown, traded locally) to treat a wide variety of illnesses with FAR less harmful side-effects -- so pot directly challenges the power and wealth of the pharmaceutical industry.<br><br>And on some subliminal level, it is a symptom of the nation's subversion by special interests. The anti-pot prohibition helps to define the absurd basis of the war of oppression and repression being waged by an illegitimate authoritarian bureaucracy on its citizens, as it rules by fear and intimidation.<br><br>Starman <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why?

Postby Sepka » Wed Apr 26, 2006 8:40 pm

The DuPont family was violently opposed to the election of FDR, to the point where they became involved in the fringes of an abortive coup in 1932. They were really too big for the Federal government to take on directly, so an understanding had to be reached instead. DuPont had a new product, 'Nylon', invented in 1930, which was under development. Nylon rope was projected (by the company's internal estimates) as better than hemp rope in every physical characteristic, but absolutely unable to compete on cost. America and the world used a lot of rope in the first half of the 20th century.<br><br>In 1937 hemp farming was hedged around with so many procedural and tax barriers (ostensibly to keep marijuana away from children) that the price of hemp rope shot through the ceiling. DuPont rode to the rescue, publicly unveiling their new Nylon rope in 1939. That's the main reason, and since then it's been mainly inertia and an unwillingness to admit that earlier rulings might not have been reasonable that's kept marijuana illegal. <br><br>-Sepka the Space Weasel <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=sepka>Sepka</A> at: 4/26/06 6:42 pm<br></i>
User avatar
Sepka
 
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

From the Horse's Mouth

Postby Mentalgongfu » Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:29 pm

This answers the original question in a relatively straightforward manner. As I understand, this study was done under Nixon, who supported strict criminalization as a way to neutralize anti-war groups and other radicals who were threatening the social order.<br><br>From the Schaffer Library of Drug Policy:<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/Library/studies/nc/mis2.htm">www.druglibrary.org/Schaf...c/mis2.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>The National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse<br>Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding <br><br>Origins of the Marihuana Problem<br><br>Marihuana has been used as an intoxicant in various parts of the world for centuries and in this country for 75 years. Yet use of the drug has been regarded as a problem of major proportions for less than a decade. We will not find the reasons for contemporary social concern in pharmacology texts or previous governmental reports, for we are dealing with two separate realities: a drug with certain pharmacologic properties and determinable, although variable, effects on man; and a pattern of human behavior, individual and group, which has, as a behavior, created fear, anger, confusion, and uncertainty among a large segment of th contemporary American public. The marihuana behavior pattern is the source of the marihuana controversy.<br><br>The most apparent feature of the behavior is that it is against the law. But inconsistency between behavior and the legal norm is not sufficient, in itself, to create a social problem. Marihuana, has been an illegal substance for several decades; and the widespread violation of laws against gambling and adultery have not excited the public to the same extent as has marihuana-smoking in recent years.<br><br>At the same time, we suspect that illegality may play an important role in problem definition where drugs are concerned. Alcohol is of proven danger to individual and societal health and the public is well aware of its dangers, yet use of this drug has not been accorded the same problem status. Marihuana's illegality may have been a necessary condition for the marihuana problem, but the increased violation of the legal proscription does not by itself explain the phenomenon.<br><br>The Commission believes that three interrelated factors have fostered the definition of marihuana as a major national problem. First, the illegal behavior is highly visible to all segments of our society. Second, use of the drug is perceived to threaten the health and morality not only of the individual but of the society itself. Third, and most important, the drug has evolved in the late sixties and early seventies, as a symbol of wider social conflicts and public issues. <br> <p></p><i></i>
Mentalgongfu
 
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 9:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why?

Postby chiggerbit » Wed Apr 26, 2006 9:35 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Why does our police state hate Marijuana?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Simple-- because people can grow their own very easily.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby LoganSquare » Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:20 am

"I can't imagine them ever being really legal unless there's a total social transformation because my analysis of it is, the reason everybody from a Marxist state to a Christian oligarchy to a high-tech industrial democracy can get together and agree that psychedelics are a terrible terrible thing is because the social effects of psychedelics being taken by large numbers of people is a kind of deconditioning from the cultural myths, whatever they are. It's no knock on any given society, it's just that if people start taking psychedelics, they start questioning what they've been told about reality. And culture is in the business of keeping you inside a set of predetermined answers to those questions."<br><br>Terrence McKenna <p></p><i></i>
LoganSquare
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:44 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:40 am

Yup. Just like orgasm, pot calms the amygdala. The amygdala is the brain's panic button which statist propaganda is designed to inflame with fear-mongering and a conveyer belt lifestyle of stress and tension.<br><br>"Jane! Get me off this crazy thing!"<br><br>Remember in the beginning of 'American Beauty' when Kevin Spacey relaxes for the first time with a joint? Changes his whole outlook on leaving the rut of an unsatisfying job and marriage. <br><br>Now that's revolutionary. <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Why does our police state hate Marijuana?

Postby DBtv » Thu Apr 27, 2006 1:44 am

It's the healing of the nations.<br><br>Rastafari! Almighty God!<br><br>The most revolutionary thing you can do is change your mind. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dbtv>DBtv</A> at: 4/26/06 11:57 pm<br></i>
DBtv
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Henry Ford--the lost Doobie Brother

Postby rothbardian » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:56 am

You folks must've known about Henry Ford and his Hemp connection? He owned acres of Marijuana plants. <br><br>He tried to promote it for use as automobile fuel...AND to construct car parts. I suspect the oil-soaked PTB nipped that in the bud. That might be the real origin of the anti-Hemp movement.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/03/335931.shtml">portland.indymedia.org/en...5931.shtml</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Ford recognized the utility of the hemp plant. He constructed a car of resin stiffened hemp fiber, and even ran the car on ethanol made from hemp. Ford knew that hemp could produce vast economic resources if widely cultivated."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>The other big opposition would be from the PTB drug industry. Far better to have us buying their overpriced and extremely dangerous drug medications...than just growing some weeds in your backyard for free.<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
rothbardian
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Free Energy and medicine ?

Postby slimmouse » Thu Apr 27, 2006 7:42 am

<br> Hmm. I wonder who wont allow that <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> Just came across this related link to the psychedelics ( hope this doesnt diversify the thread too much, but it is relatively relative ) Bold emphasis mine ;<br><br> Interview: Psychedelic healing<br><br>Torsten Passie is one of the very few scientists in the world who dare to work on the positive effects of hallucinogenic drugs. His research centres on the life-enhancing and therapeutic effects of the most powerful mind-altering drugs known to science, including hallucinogens, psychedelics (literally "mind-revealing" drugs) and entactogens (substances that induce a deep change in feelings). These are drugs that can turn your mind inside out, throwing everything into question. An LSD trip can be a terrifying whirlwind of horrific hallucinations, a delightful journey of discovery or even a mystical experience.<br>But while the dangers of hallucinogens are well known, the stigma of their illegality makes it nearly impossible to discuss, let alone research, their positive potential. Could they help the dying, the depressed or the mentally ill? If so, argues Passie, perhaps we should treat them more like dangerous sports - acceptable if treated with caution - rather than ban them and push them underground. Susan Blackmore met him earlier this year at an occasion that could hardly have been more appropriate: a conference in Basel celebrating the 100th birthday of Albert Hofmann, discoverer of LSD.<br>Why are you willing to put your reputation on the line to work with hallucinogenic drugs?<br>I have long worked on altered states of consciousness, looking at their philosophical implications, but I'm also interested in temporarily inducing severely altered states. I want to explore these states and make scientific experiments on them, including those induced by using hallucinogens.<br>Isn't it almost impossible to get grants and licences to use these drugs?<br>Licences aren't really the problem. I have permission to work with cannabis, ketamine and psilocybin, and it was no big problem to get it, but then I've been in the field more than 20 years and I know all the literature. My head of department has done a lot of work with cannabis before. He did have problems with ethics committees, but now we've got permission for everything we want. If you know what you're doing, they'll give you permission. Grants, however, are nearly impossible to get.<br>Why are you doing this work?<br>My personal interest is because I worked for many years with Hanscarl Leuner, who did pioneering work with LSD in the 1960s and continued research on hallucinogen-assisted psychotherapy until the 1990s. My intention is to rediscover the therapeutic potential and applications of these substances.<br>What kind of patients can these drugs help?<br>Nearly all kinds of patients with neurotic and psychosomatic diseases can be helped, as shown by the 300 to 400 studies from the 1950s and 1960s. Especially appropriate may be patients with anxiety neuroses, depressive neuroses and post-traumatic stress disorder.<br>How can these drugs help them?<br>It seems that MDMA (ecstasy) and the entactogens can detraumatise people from experiences that have left them in states of heavy tension and friction. To achieve this you first have to prepare a safe and stable therapeutic relationship with the patient so as to have a safe inner setting, and you need a safe external setting too. We found that these ways of experiencing oneself, others and the world are very productive and can promote what is essentially a self-healing process.<br>People can confront their memories in a state not limited by neurotic fear and inner defences - they can really open up. It seems they can mainly self-organise the processing of their experiences to promote their own healing. They can see that it's safe, and that it's nice to be open again. After that they may not go back into a closed state and you can work psychotherapeutically with them in a much more effective way.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>You mean you provide the setting, the drug and the support and they do it themselves?<br>That's right. It activates their self-healing power. This may be problematic for therapists because they are kind of useless then.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> This is something that people don't realise: that normally therapists are trying to influence somebody in some way. Here you don't have to. You only have to furnish a room nicely, do some background work, and then the process happens without danger and with great potential for a lot of people.<br>The earlier researchers found that you should do therapy in mixed groups, treating people with different kinds of neurosis together. In a scientific design you would use people who all have the same kind of neurosis, but that's counterproductive for therapy. We would like to give them MDMA first because it's easier to handle and then give them LSD a few times.<br>Are you also interested in how healthy people use drugs for recreation?<br>I am, because from these people we may learn how you can misuse the drugs or use them in an appropriate manner. When I worked with Hanscarl Leuner he was allowed to do therapy only on severe neurotics who were resistant to treatment, because of all the panic and phobia surrounding LSD in those days. We found that these people can profit from hallucinogens, no question, but the more healthy the people are, the more they can profit, because healthy people have a greater capacity for self-healing.<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>But why, if these drugs have such great healing potential, aren't they available to use?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br>There are two reasons. Firstly, any patents on them ran out long ago. No pharmaceutical company will finance a study if it gets nothing out of it. This is a major reason why we can't get money for our studies and especially for clinical studies, which are quite expensive.<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The second reason is that pharmaceutical companies are not interested in things that patients have to take only once. They're more interested in something like a hair-growing ingredient that people have to take every day and if they don't take it their hair will fall out again. That's what they're looking for. With a depressed patient, the physician may say, "Take this SSRI [selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor] anti-depressant medication and you will be better." Sure, they will be a little better, but they have to take a pill twice a day.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>You mean you could heal them once and for all?</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>As potential therapists, we would give them MDMA perhaps three times and LSD twice. Who could earn money out of it? From five doses? And after psychedelic therapy, the patient may be much better or completely healed, rather than showing slightly improved symptoms and having to take the medication for years. So in a way the pharmaceutical company is our enemy.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Are there many others working in this field?<br>I'm really on my own. This is the real problem, that there are so few people who are seriously scientifically interested. It's astonishing because a lot of people try to get information out of you, especially journalists, but they usually only want to have an impression of a special facet of the topic. They don't want to take on the therapeutic applications, or the religious and spiritual potential of these drugs. So normally I don't give interviews and I don't have that many students.<br><br>Profile<br>Torsten Passie is assistant professor for consciousness studies at Hanover Medical School, Germany. He has done extensive research on the use of hallucinogenic drugs, altered states of consciousness and shamanic practices in psychotherapy and healing.<br>Susan Blackmore will be talking about the dangers and benefits of LSD at Unhooked Thinking, an international conference on the nature of addiction at the Assembly Rooms in Bath, UK, 19-21 April (www.unhookedthinking.com).<br><br> Link ; <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://forums.ayahuasca.com/">forums.ayahuasca.com/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10492<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

why no pot?

Postby mother » Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:24 am

What could be more enraging to demonic intelligence than peals of laughter, and then more laughter? A cheerful, optimistic outlook and good humor. The heightened empathy and love for others. The appreciation for beauty everywhere, the awe of nature and glimmerings of hope that maybe God exists. The release from despair during grave illness, when death is closing in. Alcohol is so much better for fights and child abuse and fatal accidents, they tried making it illegal, and some guys got super rich from bootlegging. Crack is what "they" are about, loosing one's soul rather than finding it. <p></p><i></i>
mother
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Health

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest