dickdecent wrote:As far as I can make out Dr. Judy is a lovely, brilliantly clever, total non-spook, who has already had to face some media disinfo and totally unjustified 'conspiracy loon' smearing. Not to mention her original publishers squarely putting the boot in as severely as possible.
StarmanSkye wrote:GAWD, but those StarWarBeams photos are spooky, like scenes out of some synthetic kind of hell. At first viewing, it sure DOES make one receptive to wild ideas in order to reconcile the many apparant anomalies, bizarro effects, strangeness and hard-to-explain weirdness. However, on deeper analysis and observation I can find much more commonsense explanations for what was observed than reaching for space-based weapons.
I rather think the fire/melting/burn damage of vehicles was caused by flash-fire-type events related to the pyroclastic debris clouds of superheated particles of concrete, gypsum, glass, metal, etc. as a result of the towers falling with their 5 million cubic feet of air being driven in hurricane-force carrying burning and red-hot debris -- being heated like a forge, with properties similiar to volcanic ejecta. The weird photos of burned cars along the side of FDR Drive are most likely the result of emergency towing/storage to clear the area around Ground Zero to make way for fire/rescue and salvage/deconstruction-clearing operations, staging of heavy equipment and emergency Command/recovery operations. In any case, I think there's a perfectly rational, reasonable explanation for the pattern of damage inflicted on 1400 some vehicles due to superheated debris and patterns of insulating dust that caused spotty destruction and burning, as observed on the vehicles that were most likely parked within a block or two of ground zero. The paper debris could have been blown around AFTER the pyroclastic clouds had cooled, or were insulated or coated by cooler gypsum/concrete particles, etc. (But nothing shown is evidence that CD was not, or could not have been, employed to bring the towers down. Thermate/Thermite MIGHT help explain the incredibly high temperature fires and burning debris that COULD have helped cause this amount of flame damage to parked cars and trucks).
As best I can make out, the Fire Engine depicted from Chinatown on the Star Wars Beam site is Engine 9 attached to Engine Company 9; Companion to Ladder Company 6 -- a hook-and-ladder rig that was parked at the base of WTC 1 after the crew responded to a two-alarm call for assistance and subsequently crushed when WTC 1 collapsed. The entire Engine 9 and Ladder 6 company crews survived, the crew from Ladder 6 being pinned in the WTC 1 stairwell by a quirky fluke as the building collapsed around them while they were almost out of the building, in the process of rescuing a victim and following an order to retreat (after WTC 2 fell). VERY interesting account -- http://multimedia.belointeractive.com/a ... mpany.html
From what I was able to gather, the OTHER rig, Engine Company 9 equipment/crew truck was apparently parked far-enough away from the collapse and not seriously damaged by falling debris, having its windows broken and body dented and covered with masses of powdered junk.
It was driven to its station but conked-out before it could be parked inside. My guess is THAT is what and where the pictures featuring the damaged firetruck on the Starbeam's site were taken. I don't think anything like energy-beams are needed to account for the broken glass and mirrors. I suspect windshields of large-trucks like fire engines are designed to fall outward when damaged -- or else the windshield was heavily cracked/broken and covered with junk and so the crew just removed it (if so, so they could drive it back to their station).
Story mentioning this detail about its survival and being driven at:
http://multimedia.belointeractive.com/a ... mpany.html
"Engine 6 sits in front of the firehouse, with windows blown out and sides pocked by flying debris. The guys drove it back, but it conked out before they could get it inside the station." (The companion firetruck was a Hook-and-Ladder rig, with rear-steering to accomodate it's 50 ft+ length -- There seems to be some discrepancy as I've read both rigs referred to as "engine 6". The accurate name for the Hook-and-Ladder rig is 'Ladder 6', as the above-link refers to its crew, while the firetruck featured is actually 'Engine 9'. I suspect this was an error of the sloppy reporting variety. As I mentioned above, Ladder 6 was completely destroyed, crushed to its axles, tho its crew miraculously survived. In fact, the Engine 9/Ladder 6 station was the ONLY NYFD station to not lose any crew on 911. Engine 9/Ladder 6, based in Chinatown, were known as 'The Dragonfighters'. Ladder 6 had brass Dragons mounted on its front doors -- the only part of them to remain (when the fire engine was unburied) was a bit of one tail. The saga of the miraculously surviving crew of Ladder 6 is popularly known as 911's most amazing survival story "The single most incredible story of the 911 survival tragedy: http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stori ... 558&EDATE= This story was also told in the History Channel's 'Miracle of Stairway B' and Dateline NBC's 'Miracle of Ladder Company 6' --Starman)
I found a site featuring the Engine 9/Ladder 6/Satellite 1 Chinatown Station, and was perplexed to see what looked like another engine than the one cited on the Star War Beams site -- until I looked closely and observed the engine is a newer model 2004 Seagraves. Obviously, the older engine damaged on 911 was replaced -- more pictures of which I found here:
http://www.dragonfighters.com/html/imag ... 11_002.jpg
Note the windshield is only partly collapsed, clearly in no condition to safely drive the vehicle the 20 blocks back to the Dragonfighter's Chinatown station -- and so most likely cleared by the engine's crew. No mysterious weapon explanation needed here! Note that the front bumper pump fitting has a fire hose attached, suggesting it was being used to actively fight a fire on-scene; The exhausted fireman sitting on the bumper also indicates this engine saw active service and wasn't inexplicitly damaged by an energy weapon (or else the crew would have suffered from the energy-beam effects, eh? And they clearly weren't.)
This picture apparently shows the Engine 9 unit cleared of broken glass, debris and junk in order for the crew to try to drive it back to their station. (The street and parked car show NO evidence that this was where the engine was originally damaged).
http://www.dragonfighters.com/html/imag ... 11_003.jpg
This shows the engine parked right in front of its Chinatown station garage -- surrounding details shows this is the same location shown at the Space Beam War site -- and probably identical with the photo cited above and others.
http://www.dragonfighters.com/html/imag ... _11_04.jpg
Some other weird oddities claimed but that there was no evidence of were several claims that vehicle engine blocks were mysteriously 'missing'. The photos did NOT indicate such. I could readily identify the areas where engines would be located in cars and fire-engines and trucks/ambulances, and only noted damaged/crushed radiators and other front-end components. Similiarly, the 'missing' door handles were likely made of plastic and simply melted in proximity to superhot debris -- as did the tires which burned.
In all, there sure seems to be an awful lot of wishful-thinking hype involved in that site, perhaps to contaminate the so-called Truth Movement or Classic Conspiracy observations/theories with wild-eyed fantastic, unproveable theories re: energy beams.
PS: Gotta say, tho -- GREAT photos!
ivanbo2003 wrote:Can some one provide a plausible and logical explanation for this:5. Toasted cars over half a mile from Ground Zero.
Some of the pictures are from here:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/ ... Beam5.html
I must say i am not quite buying the "star wars beam weaponry" theory,BUT what can explain this anomaly?
orz wrote:ivanbo2003 wrote:Can some one provide a plausible and logical explanation for this:
That the site you got them from is full of cherry picked selective "evidence" and/or misinterpretation of the photos?
I mean, most of the comments on those are gibberish. Supposedly it's suspicious that a car engine is burning rather than the gas tank. Ok... so space lasers would make that "anomaly" happen... how?
I'm guessing many of those photos are of burned out cars which have been moved from the place where they burned. A lot of them look very much so, especially the ones with various parts missing.
If it's true that cars were 'melted' 5 miles away or whatever then that's unusual sure, but the vague idea of Akira-style 'space lasers' doesn't really get you anywhere towards explaining such an 'anomaly'.
911 Truther Shoots Movement in Foot – Commits Pseudocide
January 11th, 2009
I’d come across Baker’s videos before, taking some time to watch his replication of the “Hutchison Effect” that proved to me what I’d suspected all along regarding the claims of gravity defying movements and levitations allegedly created by intense electromagnetic apparatus wielded by John Hutchison; that they are fake.
http://www.anomalymagazine.com/zine/200 ... seudocide/
DrEvil wrote:I'm not going into the how of 911, I'd rather know who, but I did take a look at
and I have to say - what a pile of crap. First of all - the web page itself is god-damn ugly and painful to read. Second - the videos showing "proof" of his magical machine are laughably bad. The short flash videos are obviously shot upside down, and the longer youtube compilation is shot on a boat. And third - no real science anywhere on the page, and a plea for donations (Only 40 bucks for a video-compilation!).
I also started on the interview with Judy Woods, but turned it off after they used a disappearing white line-like smudge from a video as proof that the metal was disintegrating.
I'm sure there was absolutely no chance of the falling debris being obscured by dust, or possibly a ray of sunlight reflecting off a falling beam. No - It MUST have been nano-thermites, or nukes, or space lazors or static fields being fiddled with by radio-waves.
yesferatu wrote:Gotta go to the link to see the pics she refers to.
Not a bad article for crazy Laura.
<<15 September 2007
Ultra-terrestrials and 9/11...
... Controlled demolitions at the WTC has been scientifically proven long ago since the government's version defies basic laws of physics (not to mention an amazing series of coincidences all over the place on that day.). At this point it's just a matter of figuring out what method was used for the demolition.
NINE PIECES OF EVIDENCE FOR SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ON 9/11:
1. Seismic readings too low to account for two 500,000 ton towers
(On Dec 14, 2006, a NIST scientist said "...the collapse of the towers were not of any magnitude that was seismically significant...")
2. Concrete pulverized to powder in a way that cannot be accounted in a standard controlled demolition. (i.e. more than 50% of samples under 100 microns)
3. Steel spire turns to dust and trickles down in news videos.
4. Photographs of Ground Zero lacking enough concrete and steel to account for two 110 story towers.
5. Toasted cars over half a mile from Ground Zero.
6. Large sections of buildings "vanish"
Round holes in WTC 5 roof
Large vertical chunks "missing" from WTC 3
and WTC 6
7. Downtown Manhattan not flooded. If one million tons of towers collapsed on the slurry wall / bathtub at freefall speed, it would have broken through and flooded New York.
8. All airplanes ordered to land about fifteen minutes before the South Tower is destroyed. Right after the North Tower goes, government allows military aircraft back up.
9. Evidence for existence of Space-based weapons. (Let's remember, the government is always at least 15-20 years ahead in technology from where they publicly admit.)
Introducing the Particle-Beam Weapon by Dr. Richard M. Roberds; published in Air University Review, July-August 1984
Millimeter-wave energy to be used in a weapon by Peter Clarke; published in EE Times June 6, 2001
US hails airborne laser as weapons milestone, ABC News, October 29, 2006
So, ask yourself... what can explain ALL the anomalies listed above?
First of all, my husband, as a physicist, knows for a fact that there are weapons and technology that are already being used that are not known to the public. He developed certain technology himself that has never yet seen the light of day because it was buried in black projects. Sure, word eventually gets out after some years; but often that "word" is disinfo to distract away from what is really being done. Sometimes, it is announced as a "new discovery" because people are noticing strange things going on and the PTB have to do damage control.
This brings me to the topic of the day: Ultra-terrestrials and 9/11...
Pyroclastic flows and lahars are the greatest volcanic hazards. More people have died due to these hazards than any other volcanic hazard (Chester, 1993). Pyroclastic flows can incinerate, burn, and asphyxiate people. Gases within a pyroclastic flow can explode and cause ash to rain down on nearby areas as shown in this image near Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines (photo by M.T. Dolan). Pyroclastic flows travel long distances so their threat is far reaching. What is worse is they also can transform into lahars which travel even farther distances from the volcano and can produce even greater hazards.
Scientists recognize the hazards of pyroclastic flows, and so there is currently a lot of research going on in this area. Important research with regard to hazards prevention is the study of past pyroclastic flow deposits. Areas that have old pyroclastic flow deposits are likely to receive new pyroclastic flow deposits if the volcano erupts again. People living near the summit of an active volcano, especially those in valley areas, are most likely to be in danger from a pyroclastic flow. The best course of action for these people to take when a volcano erupts is to evacuate valley areas and head for higher ground away from the volcano. Of course, if the volcano gives ample warning that it is going to erupt, then the best thing to do is evacuate the area and get as far away from the volcano as possible.
Text by C.M. Riley
http://www.geo.mtu.edu/volcanoes/hazard ... /pyro.html
Fronts of some pyroclastic density currents are fully dilute; for example, during the eruption of Mount Pelée in 1902 a fully dilute current overwhelmed the city of Saint-Pierre and killed nearly 30,000 people.
The towns of Pompeii and Herculaneum, Italy, for example, were famously engulfed by pyroclastic surges in 79 AD with many lives lost.
A pyroclastic surge killed volcanologists Katia and Maurice Krafft and 41 other people on Mount Unzen, in Japan, on June 3, 1991. The surge started as a pyroclastic flow and the more energised surge climbed a spur on which the Kraffts and the others were standing; it engulfed them, and the corpses were covered with about 5 mm of ash.
On 25 June 1997 a pyroclastic flow travelled down Mosquito Ghaut on the Caribbean island of Montserrat. A large energised pyroclastic surge developed. This surge could not be restrained by the Ghaut and spilled out of it, killing 19 people who were in the Streatham village area (which was officially evacuated). Several others in the area suffered severe burns.
chump wrote:You're right, DrEvil : That Hutchison webpage stinks! I thought it would be helpful, but perhaps I didn't peruse it as much as I should have before including it in my post. I won't remove it, but sorry it was a waste of time.
Thank you for the links Elf. Time does fly... Starmansky seemed to suggest that cars were toasted on 9/11 because the rolling dust clouds were super hot. Conversely, this link has several pictures and descriptions which tend to cool that theory.
Have you heard any stories of people being burned by a "pyroclastic" cloud?
Do you know of anything that would exclude her theory?
By Jeff Prager
In order to cause concrete and steel to turn to micron-sized dust particles at Ground Zero as presented by Dr. Thomas Cahill, UC Davis Delta Group, the speed of sound must be reached in those items. Dr. Cahill is one of the world’s premier atmospheric physicists.
The speed of sound for concrete is 3200-3600mps (meters per second) and for steel the speed of sound is 6100mps. Based on statements by Dr. Stephen Jones he estimates the velocity for his aluminum and iron oxide energetic compound in a silica substrate at 300mps.
According to Lawrence Livermore Laboratories the maximum velocity for an energetic compound made of iron oxide and aluminum in a silica substrate is 895mps. Again, according to Lawrence Livermore the velocity can be increased to above 2000mps if copper is added.
We know that the energetic compound allegedly found by Dr. Jones did not have a copper component.
This energetic compound allegedly found by Dr. Jones is incapable of turning either steel or concrete into the micron sized particles found by Dr. Cahill.
Dr. Cahill set up his sophisticated atmospheric monitoring system on a rooftop adjacent to Ground Zero on or about October of 2001 and took air samples for close to 30 days.
Dr. Cahill stated, “soil and glass were boiling” at Ground Zero well after September 11th, 2001 and up to and including October 30, 2001 and beyond.
To vaporize or boil soil and glass rather extraordinary temperatures must be reached and maintained. A fire of this magnitude must have something feeding it oxygen.
Underground fires, whether fed by nanothermite or other incendiaries, require oxygen. There is only ONE source of igniting and maintaining a fire without a constant feed of oxygen.
T. Mark Hightower has worked as an engineer for nearly 30 years, initially in the chemical industry, then in the space program, and currently in the environmental field. He is a member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). 
In 2011 Dr. Neils Harrit was asked in an email by T. Mark Hightower (and several others included in that email) to estimate the amount of Dr. Jones’ energetic compound that would be required to take the Twin Towers down.
Dr. Harrit proposed that a low of 29,000 metric tons and a high of 144,000 metric tons would be required, per tower.
Using the low figure of 29,000 metric tons and assuming a single one-ton crate could be moved from a tractor trailer backed up to a loading dock in the basement area of the towers to its final destination within the towers every 15 minutes it would have required approximately 300 days, working 24/7, just to load the building.
Working in 8 hour day shifts it would have taken almost 3 years.
It would also have required, based on standard freight weights, over 1,500 tractor trailer loads delivered to each tower.
This is a preposterous and patently absurd scenario.
The rate of Multiple Myeloma, a very rare blood plasma cancer, across the general population is 3.0-9.0 per 100,000 people.
The average age of those afflicted with this disease is 71 with 99% of those afflicted being over the age of 65.
Based on a CDC report (see: CDC K25 Workers) we do not know what causes Multiple Myeloma.
We do know that even the most minimal exposure to radioactivity causes a measurable increase in the incidence of Multiple Myeloma.
As of March 1st, 2011, the rate of Multiple Myeloma and death among Ground Zero First Responders was 18 per 100,000 with all of those afflicted being between the ages of 37 and 60.
Reggie Hillaire, a Ground Zero First Responder, was able to beat thyroid cancer only to contract Multiple Myeloma in late 2011.
Some First Responders have succumbed to not one, not two, but in some cases three rare cancers.
The cancer incidence among Ground Zero First Responders, while un-addressed in the mainstream media, is epidemic.
The incidence of Thyroid cancer, brain cancer, pancreatic cancer and many other cancers is significantly elevated among Ground Zero First Responders.
More profound is that never have we seen rapid onset cancers in asbestos workers or other industrial workers exposed to the wide variety of carcinogens found in the Ground Zero dust (see USGS report #01-0429 – Chemistry Table 1)
We have only seen rapid onset cancers in those people exposed to radiation at Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Chernobyl.
It should be noted that cancers were just recently covered by the US government for Ground Zero First Responders.
In mid-2012 I discussed my findings re: USGS report #01-0429 and the analysis of that reports Chemistry Table 1 which I published  to the CDC/NIOSH web site and the internet at large, with Dr. Christopher Busby.
Dr. Christopher Busby is a world renowned nuclear physicist specializing in nuclear demolition.
Dr. Busby is a director of Green Audit Limited, a private company, and scientific advisor to the Low Level Radiation Campaign (LLRC).
He is also a visiting professor at the University of Ulster and was the National Speaker on Science and Technology for the Green Party of England and Wales. Dr. Busby is respected worldwide.
That analysis, while wholly inadequate in explaining fully what occurred on 911, was, nevertheless, accurate in many cases as Dr. Busby points out. Yet Dr. Busby goes further and explains that he’s found similar elements at similarly high levels in craters in Fallujah, Iraq and other war torn areas of the globe.
Dr. Busby then offers an opinion as to what may have caused these anomalous levels of the elements in the various dust samples from Fallujah, Iraq, Ground Zero, NYC and other areas across the globe.
Excerpts from that email follow:
From: “firstname.lastname@example.org” To: “jeff prager”
WTC trace elements arguments
I have briefly examined the paper presenting an argument on the basis of “trace element” concentrations in dust and on girder residues from the WTC that the buildings that they were destroyed by nuclear fission.
The arguments are incorrect for a number of reasons. However, the evidence is interesting and I will briefly discuss the issues.
Barium and Strontium are not trace elements, they are common constituents of any material that contains Calcium (concrete) as they are in the same chemical group and occur together. I agree however that they are present in very much higher amounts than they should.
Both elements are toxic but not highly toxic
A correlation between Ba and Ca would be expected in any sample since they occur together and with Ca because they are in Group II of the periodic table and share chemistry.
But it is highly unusual to find such high levels of Barium
I also found high levels Barium and Strontium in war debris in Gaza, Fallujah Iraq and the Lebanon.
You do not get high levels of Bariums and Strontium from nuclear fission. They are both fission products in the form Ba-140 and Sr-89 and Sr-90 but the quantities in grams are ridiculously low. You must not confuse activity (becquerels) with mass (grams). The whole of the Sr-90 releases from Fukushima or from Chernobyl amount to a few grams. A fission yield of a 2 Megaton Test (which would have destroyed New York entirely) would make only which 1014Bq of Sr-90 and represents 18grams. For Barium it is less than a gram. So this argument about too much Sr and Ba does not work. The argument is even more absurd when applied to Thorium (see below).
C-14 is not formed by fission but by neutron activation.
Although Thorium-234 is formed by fission or Uranium, the quantities are even smaller than Ba and Sr because the half-life of Th-234 is less than a month. So the amount of Th-234 made from 1 gram of U-239 is less than 1 x 10-11g.
The ratio of U to Th on this basis would be 1011.
OK let’s move on to what could have happened based on my deconstruction of the data from the war zones:
The concentration of Uranium is a key. This is slightly too high in the dust and much too high in the girder coatings. The activities for 2.7, 3.2, 4.7 and 7.57 are 33, 40, 58 and 93Bq/kg. The graph shows that there is too much U on the girder coatings. Normal levels of U are about 12, at most 40Bq/kg
My belief is that there is a cold fusion weapon or device of some sort. This employs Uranium and Deuterium. The output is neutrons, lots of heat, lots of energy, gamma radiation. The devise is the size of an apple or grapefruit but heavy (20-40kg). No radioactivity after the explosion except from Tritium H-3 which together with He-4 is the product and some short lived gamma radiation from neutron activations products (e.g. Ca-45 from the Ca in the concrete, Fe-55 from the steel). These would be radioactive for a few days only. [emphasis mine]
You would thus expect to find too much Uranium and also Tritium. You find both. There is a paper showing high levels of Tritium in the water at WTC. We also see U levels are too high.
Maybe the Barium is part of this mixture, and the Strontium. I have certainly found high levels of both in the war samples.
Regards, Chris Busby
My conclusions and assertions are as follows:
Nano thermite is an incendiary. Explosives are classified as having velocities exceeding 3000mps. The incendiary nanothermite allegedly found by Dr. Stephen Jones is incapable of turning any component of the steel structured Twin Towers or the cement to micron sized particles or what is commonly referred to in scientific circles as ‘very fine particles’, as we all saw on 911 and as Dr. Thomas Cahill outlines.
Nanothermite is incapable of maintaining underground, oxygen starved fires at the temperatures required to ‘boil soil and glass’ as Dr. Thomas Cahill stated.
The chain of possession of the dust samples allegedly found at Ground Zero and controlled by Dr. Jones is highly suspect, unverifiable and unscientific. The chain of possession of the dust samples procured by the USGS on September 16th and 17th, 2001 at Ground Zero, NYC, is known and secure. The chain of possession followed standard scientific procedure as outlined in USGS Report #01-0429. Nano thermite and energetic compound residue was not found in the USGS dust samples.
The perpetrators of 911 spent far more time developing strategies to deal with public opinion after the event than they did on the event itself. Public opinion after the fact needed to be carefully managed and that management process was a critical component of the event.
Dr. Stephen Jones spent a significant portion of his career at the Department Of Energy which is the government agency that is responsible for all nuclear research in the United States. He worked specifically with Muon Catalyzed Fusion, Cold Fusion, Deuterium, Lithium Deuteride and other elements of the cold fusion process. Dr. Jones is a knowledgeable and respected physicist.
Dr. Stephen Jones refuses to discuss the issues raised in this essay and maintains adamantly that 911 had no nuclear component whatsoever.
Dr. Christopher Busby states that the dust samples from 911 indicate a cold fusion process using deuterium which is precisely the science and elements Dr. Jones studied at the Department of Energy.
I just as adamantly disagree with Dr. Stephen Jones. That 911 was a nuclear event is certain and anyone attempting to maintain that it was not is part of the cover-up being foisted upon the American people.
Exposure to nuclear radiation is the most odious and repulsive event a human being can experience. That secret is being kept by those in the media spotlight in the 911 movement, to include Dr. Stephen Jones.
Why Use Nuclear Weapons?
Nuclear weapons, 4th generation or even more advanced weapons, are ideal because they are extremely small with very predictable profiles. After decades of underground nuclear testing this science has been refined to an extraordinary level of competence.
With nano-technology the various control systems necessary to a nuclear device are infinitesimally smaller than those we’re familiar with from the 1960s.
Advanced nuclear grenades, nuclear weapons the size of apples or grapefruits as Dr. Busby states, are the most secretive technological advancement in real world weapons systems. Nuclear devices as described herein were the only possible way to destroy the buildings without having enormous chunks of building debris fly all over NYC and smash down on dozens of surrounding buildings.
Theses enormous structures had to be turned to dust. Destruction was kept to a minimum although overall it was still quite devastating. It could have been monumentally worse had standard explosives been used:
DDF – 10,000mps HMX – 9,100mps RDX – 8,750mps TNT – 6,900MPS Jones’ Thermite 300-895mps
The velocity of thermite is far too low yet the velocity of standard explosives is extraordinarily high and the total destruction would have been inconceivable.
Nuclear demolition – turns most of the structure to a fine dust in less than 600 milliseconds, micron sized particles, which could be and were then, carried away by the prevailing winds. The remaining dust settled across New York City and beyond with small portions of the remaining structure piling up in cratered areas of Ground Zero.
Velocities achieved by a nuclear explosion would be rapidly exceeded by the molecular dissociation caused by the brief but very intense heat. Some structure would be ejected, as we saw, but far less than with conventional explosives.
Nuclear energy is the only type of demolition that carries the total energy budget required to turn 100s of 1000s of tons of material to micron sized very fine particles. While much of the towers were recovered, a substantial portion of the buildings can be seen in dozens of images of both dense pyroclastic clouds emanating from Ground Zero and spreading across the city and the enormous atmospheric clouds swept across the state and out to sea by the prevailing winds.
1. The Engineering Toolbox: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sound ... d_713.html
2. No Thermite by T. Mark Hightower, commentary by Jeff Prager: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88208233/No-Thermite
3. Has Nanothermite Been Oversold To The 911 Truth Community by T. Mark Hightower: http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Nan ... 110501.pdf
4. Nanothermite: If It Doesn’t Fit You Must Acquit, Veterans Today: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/27 ... st-acquit/
5. Multiple Myeloma: A Study Of K25 Workers: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pgms/worknotif ... -06-09.pdf
6. For access to this link you must Google: USGS Report #01-0429: the link does not work: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/
7. Ionizing Radiation 911 by Jeff Prager:
Part 1: http://www.scribd.com/doc/88204482/Ioni ... ages-1-243
Part 2: http://www.box.net/shared/h5gvyev9q8
Part 3: http://www.box.net/shared/ctdmz7la4j
8. Aerosol Science and Technology • Volume 38, Issue 2, 2004, Analysis of Aerosols From The World Trade Center Collapse Site, New York, Detection and Evaluation of Long-Range Transport of Aerosols – (Delta Group) October 2 to October 30, 2001:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1 ... 0490250836
9. Excerpted from the book ‘Dust,’ pages 19-42, complete chemistry and physics analysis of USGS Report #01-0429 and Chemistry Table 1: http://www.datafilehost.com/download-b128ac41.html
10. AVIRIS – TIN (Triangular Irregular Network) Constructed from LIDAR data: http://www.geo.hunter.cuny.edu/~rdatta/ ... 20copy.jpg
11. 3D Model Rendered from Triangular Irregular Network data – Ground Zero in 3D showing visible craters at Twin Towers:
http://www.geo.hunter.cuny.edu/~rdatta/ ... 20copy.jpg
12. B2level CAD and Oct 18 2001 3D – Below ground view of Ground Zero showing crater depths at the Twin Towers and Building 7 at more than 60 feet deep:
http://www.geo.hunter.cuny.edu/~rdatta/ ... 20copy.jpg
"It was a giant falling cuisinart (like the flying cuisinart ball in Phantasm films). "
Question: WHO are protected by the 9-11 holographic projection and video fakery narrative? Is there an 'inner sanctum' group of psy-ops professionals who think they can insulate themselves by conjuring a narrative that eliminates them from the suspects list?
Or are these narratives just stall and diversion tactics to divert attention, fragment the solidarity of the 9/11 activists, and mislead people away from the evidence that is very damning and which points to a long list of people and agencies which had the motive, the means, and the opportunity?
Bollyn Responds: A very good question. I would have to agree that these false narratives are primarily designed to serve as diversion tactics to divert attention and fragment the 9-11 truth movement. The Judy Wood theory that the Twin Towers were pulverized by a directed-energy beam weapon is yet another of these red herrings. The purpose of these false theories is to confuse the population, to distract the activists, and divide the 9-11 truth movement. This is not unlike the psychological warfare methods that are employed against the enemy population during war.
The official final report of the fires does not explain what was on the 81st floor, which seems odd because this is the floor, leased by Fuji Bank, into which the airplane crashed. A former employee of the bank came forward and told me that the bank had reinforced the floor in 1999 to support a very heavy load of computer back-up batteries. "The whole floor was batteries,"he said, "huge battery-looking things" They were "all black" and "solid, very heavy" things, which had been brought in during the night. They had been put in place during the summer prior to 9-11, he said. But were they really batteries? "It's weird," he said, "They were never turned on."
So, what was really on the 81st floor of the South Tower? What was in these heavy "battery looking things?" Were they batteries, or were they Thermite? And is it more than a coincidence that both of the planes flew directly into secure computer rooms in both towers and that both spectacular explosions showed evidence of Thermite-produced white smoke?
Eugene Franklin Mallove (June 9, 1947 – May 14, 2004) was a scientist, science writer, editor, and publisher of Infinite Energy magazine, and founder of the non-profit organization New Energy Foundation. He was a strong proponent of cold fusion, and a supporter of its research and related exploratory alternative energy topics, some of which are, at times, disparaged as "fringe science".
Mallove authored Fire from Ice, a book detailing the 1989 report of table-top cold fusion from Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann at the University of Utah. Among other things, the book claims the team did produce "greater-than-unity" output energy in an experiment successfully replicated on several occasions, but that the results were suppressed through an organized campaign of ridicule from mainstream physicists, including those studying controlled thermonuclear fusion, trying to protect their research and funding.
Mallove was murdered in 2004 while cleaning out his former childhood home, which had been rented out. Three people have been arrested and charged in connection with the killing. The first trial began April 2012.
NYC to Sift Construction Debris for More Remains of 9/11 Victims
Friday, Mar 29, 2013 | Updated 3:22 PM EDT
The city has collected about 60 dump truck loads of debris from construction areas around the World Trade Center site over the past two and a half years that will be sifted for fragments of 9/11 victims' remains, officials announced Friday.
The debris has been collected from the World Financial Center, West Street and a lot near Liberty Street since the last sifting operation in mid-2010.
The material amounts to 590 cubic yards -- 38 from the WTC, 13 from the western edge of the southbound lanes of West Street and 539 from the Liberty Street area, where four pieces of possible human remains have already been found.
The material will be combed for about 10 weeks starting Monday at a mobile sifting unit set up on Staten Island, city officials said.
Any human remains will be analyzed by the medical examiner's office for possible matches to 9/11 victims. Of the 2,750 people killed at the trade center, 1,634 have had remains identified.
"We will continue DNA testing until all recovered remains that can be matched with a victim are identified," Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway wrote Friday in a memo to Mayor Bloomberg.
The city expanded its search for remains of trade center victims in 2006, when several bones were found in a manhole.
Watch a time-lapse video of the 9/11 memorial being constructed from 2004 to 2011.
Since the discovery of the manhole bones, the city has sifted debris from various construction sites and subterranean areas surrounding the 16-acre trade center site. More than 1,800 pieces of potential human remains have been found.
The office has made 34 new identifications since 2006, and hundreds of fragments of remains have been matched to people who were already identified.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest