Chomsky complicit AND actively guilty in 9-11?

[vigilantwarrior]

For what it's worth, "Hawkins" is generally regarded as the resident spook on the st911 forum. He is known for spamming threads with off-topic dumps of specious data implicating everyone from Maurice Strong and the French-Canadian Illuminati to Saddam Hussein to Bill and Hilary Clinton as the masterminds of 9/11. Of course there's plenty of dirt to go around (Oklahoma City, eg). But conspicuously absent from his list of suspects is the current administration (whom he portrays as "framed" or "blind-sided"). Zero analysis of any evidence pointing to the PNAC. <p></p><i></i>

[darkbeforedawn]

Now Bill and Hilliary--I can believe that one. Theyare in very tight with Bushco. Barbara even calls him "son". Bill and George were dealers together back in the good ole days. They are said to be a major arranged marriage with heavy CIA and Rockefeller backing. But thanks for the heads up. this guy Hawks could be a real disinfo as opposed to all the fake ones like Reynolds and Jones? How are we to know? I still think it's pretty incredible that these bastions of pompous "morality" like Chomsky and Cockburn are silent or worse about the culpability of Bushco in 9-11. When "brilliant" minds such as these keep ignoring building 7 and the Norad stand down well, it makes you think of certain copious posters on this board.... <p></p><i></i>

[Joe Hillshoist]

"that 9/11 was the legitimate and inevitable response of worldwide terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda to the imperial excesses of U.S. capitalism and its leaders' exploitation of the working class."<br><br>If only.<br><br>Lets face it that would be great on some levels.<br><br>19 blokes with box cutters brought down the biggest symbols of Capitalism in the world, and nearly screwed its economy.<br><br>Its funny that idea has never taken off in the western world, I dunno about the third world, but perhaps there it has, given the popularity of Osama in non western countries perhaps there is something in it<br><br>Of course one of the consequences of that day is the marginalisation and almost complete dissappearance of the worldwide anti globalisation movement in the west.<br><br>If chomsky is a bush asset his insistance that 911 was a response to global capitalism and exploitation (which it obviously was if it happened the way it is portrayed on the MSM, and even if it was a scam, it could easily have involved manipulating people with a genuine grievance) is about as anti working people as you can get on a very deep level.<br><br>Then again the US mentality toward working people has always been one of exploiting cattle.<br><br>If you are not with us you are against us and if you aren't with our attitude to a living wage and an 8 hour day, (IE get ridf of them both) then you obviously have terrorist sympathies.<br><br>No doubt Joe Hill's body is spinning fast in whatever place it ended up after fleeing that bad old Utah ground. <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

the bush clinton nexus runs the US of A<br><br><br>hellery was a former repub who sat on the JFK investigation in the 70s and hid the daddy bush involvement and NOW in 2008 Poppy O will reward hellery with the pResidency<br><br>CIA arranged marriage as is the kerry /heinz farce marriage and she is another former repub<br><br>Funny ...Kerry met her in 1990 and her hubby Sen. John Heinz was plane crashed on 4/4/1991 gotta lub dem 11 type dates.<br><br>and his best pal Sen John Towers was plane crashed on 4/5/1991 .BUT I know its all CONcidences and some here will assure that it remains CONcidences <p></p><i></i>

[Joe Hillshoist]

Ha - I remember seeing sometyhing on tv years ago about hillary. It was an interview with a friend of hers from the days she met Bill.<br><br>Her friend said on tv, that hillary was talking about him before her friend had met him. Hillary said words to the effect of "You have to meet this guy, he'll be president one day." <p></p><i></i>

[darkbeforedawn]

Well, they all seem just like actors to me now, including Kerry, putting on some sort of "show". And I would have to believe that Chomsky and his ilk also participate in the "show" with a lot of high flying rhetoric, pretending to be sympathetic to the great unwashed, but in reality, dehumanizing and confirming all of our greatest fears and prejudices about their terrible "threat" and that they will come here and just randomly blow up our gigantic, heavily fortressed buildings out of sheer spite. They obviously didn't get anything for it. Who benefited--warmongers and Larry Silverstein with billions in insurance pay off. <p></p><i></i>

[Bismillah]

The title of this thread gets the prize for the single most ridiculous thing ever written about 9/11. <p></p><i></i>

[darkbeforedawn]

To be part of a cover-up of a crime IS guilt. Chomsky persists in the cover up and the blaming of 9-11 on extremists and poverty. And there is circumstantial evidence implicating many at MIT of cooperating with gov agents not only in the cover-up such as writing the phoney "pancake" by the engineers at MIT, but also in providing high tech support. Why would this theory be more outrageous than 19 lapdancing, flightschool flunking, Koran lugging Jihadists who continued on living after their own "suicide" missions? I'm mad at Chomsky because he pretends to be a broadminded far thinking "liberal". Just another disinfo spreader with a NWO agenda who uses a lot of big words and poses as someone with a moral platform. <p></p><i></i>

[dbeach]

Chomsky is as overrated as many of the others in the so called left <p></p><i></i>