New Pentagon Plane Video To be Released?

[slimmouse]

<br><br> Any No Penta- planers prepared to deal with this thread in a logical fashion ?<br><br> Strikes me as if we should all follow our instincts a bit more, no ?<br><br> <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=36111#36111">www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=36111#36111</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[nomo]

Lessee.... If they do release a video showing an identifiable plane, how many of you "truth" people will claim that it's fake?<br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

That would indeed be inevitable with any new evidence or images of 9/11...<br><br>BUT as I just said, and i'm not a member of the 9/11 conspiracy fan scene by any means; if they do show video from a hotel security CCTV camera which shows a low flying jet in any more detail than a plane-shaped blur, then I'll be the first in line to declare it fake! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> Which is why it's a waste of time getting too excited about this particular line of enquiry: Unless a previously unknown film crew or stills photographer on the scene got the fluke shot of a lifetime, (or were in on it hehe) we're never gonna see clear footage or stills of the plane due to the limitations of CCTV technology. <p></p><i></i>

[slimmouse]

<br> But Nomo, Orz, What about that data provided in the link ?<br><br> Data which PROVES that the official story of flight 77 is a pile of manure ?<br><br> Spoken , so to speak from the very body defacating this manure ?<br><br> I trust you listened too to the recent phone call I posted here with the spokesman for the body of the defacatees ?<br><br> And if not , why not ?<br><br> What really pee's me off sometimes, is that people ask for 'hard evidence' as opposed to "Intuition".<br><br> If that "official" Black Box information isnt further Hard evidence ( were that truly needed ) of the fact that the story of flight 77 is little more than a hopelessy inadequated fabrication, then I give up lol. <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

[/quote]And if not , why not ?[/quote]<br>Because it wouldn't load in my browser.<br><br>Will do some time if i get the chance. <p></p><i></i>

[slimmouse]

<br> My link to the thread I posted works first off which is strange (anyone else interested have this problem ?)<br><br> Meantime, here is a direct link to the audio footage ;<br><br> <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=YPF4Lo4wkJ4">youtube.com/watch?v=YPF4Lo4wkJ4</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[Mel]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Lessee.... If they do release a video showing an identifiable plane, how many of you "truth" people will claim that it's fake?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Lessee.... If we're told that NONE of the airline pilots punched in the 4-digit "hijack' code, how many of you "co-conspirators" will claim there's nothing wrong with that?<br><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>

[orz]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>My link to the thread I posted works first off which is strange (anyone else interested have this problem ?)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->The link worked but the files on the thread wouldn't... just my browser being weird i;m sure... <p></p><i></i>

[HughManateeWins]

http://boeing.com/commercial/757family/200back/back4.html

Flight Deck

The 757-200 flight deck, designed for two-crew member operation, pioneered the use of digital electronics and advanced displays.

* A fully integrated flight management computer system (FMCS) provides for automatic guidance and control of the 757-200 from immediately after takeoff to final approach and landing.
* The precision of global positioning satellite (GPS) system navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer.
* The captain and the first officer each have a pair of electronic displays for primary flight instrumentation.
* The engine indicating and crew alerting system, often called EICAS, monitors and displays engine performance and airplane system status before takeoff. It also provides caution and warning alerts to the flight crew if necessary. EICAS monitoring also aids ground crews by providing maintenance information.

The 757-200 is available with a wind shear detection system that alerts flight crews and provides flight-path guidance to cope with it.

Flight decks of the 757 and 767 are nearly identical and both aircraft have a common type-rating. Pilots qualified to fly one of the aircraft also can fly the other with only minimal additional familiarization.

Built-in test equipment helps ground crews troubleshoot avionics and airplane systems quickly for easier maintenance than on earlier aircraft.

[HughManateeWins]

[/img]

[orz]

http://boeing.com/commercial/757family/200back/back4.html

If you're implying remote takeover maybe don't jump to conclusions...? There's a PDF out there from an airline technician that does a pretty thorough job of explaining why this is nowhere near as feasible as it may seem. I pretty much believed remote control was a definite possibility until i read this. The document can be found here, with also some fairly minor counterpoints: http://www.kolumbus.fi/totuus/doc/remcon.html

Also, one day I'll find the photo of WTC cleanup workers cutting up those columns at that same angle, with torches. :-S

I really don't wanna always be the debunker here, but just pointing out other explanations/options should be considered if you want to make a good case.

[Infernal Optimist]

Also, one day I'll find the photo of WTC cleanup workers cutting up those columns at that same angle, with torches. :-S

So, these torches: they use jet fuel to power them, right?

[orz]

Very funny... no wait, I mean very irrelevent to what i posted.

If there is evidence that the angled cut girders at WTC were cut with torches, then it means that the claim that such pictures are proof of CD is not neccessarily true. I'd hope people would thus think twice before holding it up as definite proof.

I'm not trying to debunk everything or uphold the 'official theory', i'm just pointing out something Hugh may not have known about which could potentially contradict something he's strongly stating as fact. I cant find the picture i'm talking about so i admit that's not much use, sorry! But it's worth considering/researching.

Why would anyone want their theories to not be as factually correct as possible, or to be unprepared for an easy comeback from 'debunkers'?

[orz]

Haha I was googling for the afforementioned photo to no avail yet, but i did find this page of archived discussion: Scroll down to (assuming the formatting is messed up in the same way in your browser) see an unitentional visual analogy of the whole 9/11 'debate':

http://lofi.forum.physorg.com/911-Event ... -5200.html

[orz]

Here we go:
http://www.debunking911.com/cut.jpg
http://www.debunking911.com/cut2.jpg

yeah i know... "debunking911.com"

But still... for whatever it's worth you gotta admit that looks pretty similar to the cut girder above.