"Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hamilton

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:33 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Do you have a comment about "Meet the Press?" Send us a note via our "Meet the Press Mailbox".<br><br>What question would you like to ask this Sunday's "Meet the Press" guests? Click here to send us your questions.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :eek --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eek.gif ALT=":eek"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ..... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :hat --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/pimp.gif ALT=":hat"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> ..... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :D --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif ALT=":D"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sat Aug 12, 2006 2:38 pm

Ah, very good...<br><br><br>What would you like to ask this week's guests?<br>Fill in the form to send us a question. We look forward to hearing from you.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6913788/">msnbc.msn.com/id/6913788/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 12, 2006 3:46 pm

Shall we take turns? <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:03 pm

I just sent in the Lou Dobbs transcript, Mark Dayton's transcript "commission not worth and Enron pension", along with the 9/11 widow's statement.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby pugzleyca3 » Sat Aug 12, 2006 4:42 pm

I just asked them if the 9/11 Commission knew they were being "lied" to regarding the FAA/NORAD timelines, why they didn't do something about it at the time. I also told them that I and everyone else I know believe the 9/11 Commission to be nothing more than a whitewash and at the end: God Help The United States of America!<br><br>What a shame no one will ask them the hard questions. I know they won't pick my email. heh! If they did, I can hear it now: "Whatever does she mean by that? Next."<br><br>Edited to add: I wasn't done so I sent another email:<br><br>Why wasn't the collapse of Building 7 at the World Trade Center included in the 9/11 Commission Report? I mean, it fell straight down in a matter of seconds, just like the towers. People knew ahead of time it was going to collapse, that's widely acknowledged if you look in the right places for the information. How in the world did they know that? No plane hit this building, I would think someone would have looked at the possibility of explosives bringing it down. Even Silverstein said they had already seen so much loss of life that day and they decided to "Pull it" and down it came. What is going on here? How long does it take to set the explosives in a 47 storey building in order to bring it straight down like Building 7 was shown to be on television? Surely not just a few hours?<br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=pugzleyca3>pugzleyca3</A> at: 8/12/06 3:05 pm<br></i>
pugzleyca3
 
Posts: 726
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby NewKid » Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:43 pm

Kean/Hamilton just now show up with a book telling us all these new "revelations"? This had to be planned back in March or April at the latest. Maybe Charlie Sheen did scare some of these guys? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 8/12/06 3:44 pm<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sun Aug 13, 2006 12:51 pm

re: Meet The Press- Sun... <br><br>WOW, WHAT A COMPLETE CRAP INTERVIEW!<br><br>David Gregory AVOIDED the NORAD lying under oath COMPLETELY! The doddering old fool cOmmissioners even backed off their criticising of Rudy. What a lame ass interview. <br><br>Gregory, you're a failure as a 'watchdog' press...an enabler for the criminal complicity and coverup. You just helped them carry off the loot.<br>I posted this prediction elsewhere, aside from the name of the interviewer, right on target.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>These SOBs...they're utilizing the recent 'thwarted' false flag to co-ordinate an association/reinforcement with the 9/11 fable. Russert will host/direct a whitewash and AVOID all the blatent lies told by these criminals. Furthermore I predict he will not even mention how NORAD, FAA, and others LIED UNDER OATH, or how the Commission was COMPLICIT and instead of investigating, COVERED UP the lies and was an accessory to MASS MURDER. Kean and Hamilton should be under intense press interrogation if not investigation! <br><br>Russert is a worthless pageboy for the Empire. Look for a complete whitewash. <br><br>This 'interview' has two purposes. One, to instill FEAR/TERROR in the population, and two, to close the loop of lies being exposed. <br><hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Russert

Postby HMKGrey » Sun Aug 13, 2006 2:50 pm

When I first moved to America I couldn't believe Russert, King and Walters even had jobs - let alone that they were superstars on whose "tough questions" and "hard nosed, take no prisoners style" the nation depended. <br><br>Compared to UK interviewers (say Paxman - who's now a different kind of monster altogether, mind you) they were almost childlike. <br><br>Russert is the worst because he actually is supposed to stand for something and be something. <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>A professional</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. The other two are just playing the game, but Fat Tim is supposed to do this properly. <br><br>I gave up on him a long time ago. He's just a water carrier for the monsters and it makes him feel important. Deep down he knows. He has to know. If I met him, I'd give him a poke in the eye. <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Russert

Postby chiggerbit » Sun Aug 13, 2006 3:39 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>If I met him, I'd give him a poke in the eye.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <br><br>Pumkinheads don't really have eyes, so you'd just poke your hand through to the empty space inside. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:15 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Haven't I seen his name in association with the October Surprise?"</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Hamilton chaired the House task force that "investigated" it.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NORAD timeline, flight 93, Toledo Air Guard

Postby Hugh Manatee Wins » Sun Aug 13, 2006 10:57 pm

"Lt. Col. Carole Allen - the base spokeswoman - said personnel were still grieving over <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>the unexpected death of their 44-year-old commander of operations, Pete Raffa, who died seven days ago of a heart attack.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->"<br><br>I'm hypothesizing that the shoot-down of flight 93 is being vigorously covered-up along with the details of the war games absorbing personnel the morning of 9/11.<br><br>The cover-up around the US miitary shoot-down of TWA800 is being sustained, too.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?Date=20011209&Category=NEWS28&ArtNo=112090036&Ref=AR">www.toledoblade.com/apps/...036&Ref=AR</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Article published Sunday, December 9, 2001<br><br>SPECIAL REPORT<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Toledo's Air Guard called to defend U.S. on Sept. 11<br>Local pilots some of first into air</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Photo<br>F-16s from the Air Guard unit at Toledo Express Airport, like this one flying over Kuwait in 1998, took to the skies on Sept. 11.<br>( U.S. AIR FORCE )<br>Zoom | Photo Reprints<br><br>By MICHAEL D. SALLAH<br>and JOE MAHR<br>BLADE STAFF WRITERS<br><br>In the frantic minutes after terrorists downed three hijacked airliners in New York and Washington, the Air Force sent up jets ready to shoot down any other planes that threatened the East Coast.<br><br>Jets from a Massachusetts base circled New York. Jets from Virginia soared over the nation's capitol.<br><br>And, guarding the rest of the nation in the first chaotic minutes of the crisis: F-16s from Toledo.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Federal military officials recently confirmed that the 180th Fighter Wing - an Ohio Air National Guard unit based at Toledo Express Airport - was the first unit outside the East Coast to answer the Air Force's plea for immediate help.<br><br>And had the last hijacked plane continued west - or had any other hijacked plane headed across the heartland - the Toledo fighter wing was the only unit immediately available to carry out the ultimate act: Shoot it down.<br><br>"They had the fuel. They had guns. That's what was needed," said retired Lt. Col. Alan Scott, who has been analyzing the air responses for the Air Force.<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Three months after the worst terrorist attack in America's history, new details are emerging about the frenzied minutes from the time the first plane hit the World Trade Center to the time the nation had grounded every civilian plane in the sky.<br><br>The man responsible for coordinating the air defense strategy over the hard-hit area - Lt. Col. Robert Marr - confirmed to The Blade last week that the Toledo unit played a critical role as the nation's military geared up for any more attacks.<br><br>"It just had a phenomenal response on Sept. 11," Colonel Marr said from his command post in Rome, N.Y.<br><br>The new details also reveal a key weakness in the nation's air defense system on Sept. 11 - a weakness that left the interior of the nation more vulnerable.<br><br>Up until that day, the military's radar trackers had a Cold War posture of looking outside America's borders for threatening invaders. Those radars were positioned along the continental coasts, leaving blind spots in America's interior.<br><br>That meant the military was forced to rely on civilian air traffic controllers at the Federal Aviation Administration to detect what was in the skies - something they're now trying to fix.<br><br>"We're working very hard in trying to achieve an interior look," said Colonel Scott, now an Air Force consultant, whose first briefing of the issue was broadcast on C-Span last week.<br><br>Toledo's response on Sept. 11 is believed to be the first time the unit has answered a call from the North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD - the special U.S. and Canadian military agency that scans the skies around the continent watching for any kind of invaders, from nuclear missiles to foreign fighter jets.<br><br>A former commander of the Toledo fighter wing, Lt. Col. Gary Chudzinsk, said the local base has always been aware that it could be alerted to such crises "but you just don't expect it."<br><br>"In [my] 31 years, I've never heard of that happening," said the lieutenant colonel, who retired seven years ago.<br><br>But with the hijackers striking the nation's vital spots, military officials say they were forced to call Toledo and other units to protect America's interior.<br><br>To be sure, the nation was in a deep peace on the morning of Sept. 11. Only 14 military jets were on alert at seven locations at 8 a.m. EST - all along the country's borders, according to the briefing.<br><br>Additionally, the people who monitor America's radar system - the Federal Aviation Administration - were not poised for what was about to unfold.<br><br>The trouble began at 8:20 a.m., when the first hijacked airliner, American Airlines Flight 11, turned off its transponder, an electronic device that tells the FAA the plane's location.<br><br>Twenty minutes later - after the plane veered off course - FAA officials alerted the North East Air Defense Sector based in Rome, N.Y., of the possible hijacking. Six minutes later, the plane crashed into the trade center.<br><br>At that same time, the military response began. The sector commander, Colonel Marr, ordered two Massachusetts-based F-15 fighter jets to prepare for takeoff. In six minutes - considered a quick response time - the jets left for New York, closing the 153-mile gap at speeds of 950 mph.<br><br>They were eight minutes too late to catch the second plane's crash into the trade center, but they set up an air patrol of the city to catch any other potential hijacked planes.<br><br>Within a few minutes, hijackers took control of the third plane as it crossed the southern tip of Ohio, turning it around toward Washington. A military transport plane in the area told the FAA it was flying low and fast, prompting air traffic controllers to call the Rome, N.Y., command center.<br><br>Two jets were scrambled for takeoff, and within six minutes they embarked on a 100-mile journey from Langley Air Force base in southeastern Virginia to Washington. But the third plane crashed into the Pentagon as the jets were 12 minutes away.<br><br>Then, a fourth plane deviated from its westward flight path and circled counter-clockwise around the western Cleveland suburbs, prompting another call from the FAA to Rome, N.Y., command center.<br><br>By 10:01 a.m., the command center began calling several bases across the country for help. That included a phone call to Toledo's 1,000-member 180th Fighter Wing.<br><br>At 10:17 a.m., according to the briefing, Toledo's fighter jets took off, heading east.<br><br>"They basically just took aircraft that were just being set up for training missions and launched out to help defend the skies over North America, wherever they could," Colonel Marr said. "[The response was] very, very, very quick."<br><br>By then, President Bush had issued an order to shoot down that fourth plane before it hit any potential targets, and the jets in Washington were still circling.<br><br>It's unclear what role Toledo's jets played before they were joined by Air National Guard jets from Syracuse at 10:44 a.m. The fourth plane crashed into a western Pennsylvania hillside sometime between 10:02 and 10:10 a.m., officials say.<br><br>Toledo Air Guard officials declined to talk about the events that morning, even in general terms permitted by the military.<br><br>Lt. Col. Carole Allen - the base spokeswoman - said personnel were still grieving over the unexpected death of their 44-year-old commander of operations, Pete Raffa, who died seven days ago of a heart attack.<br><br>But, in explaining their mission, Colonel Marr said the Toledo jets "never had a track close enough that they were directed to engage."<br><br>"[But] if a valid direction had come from the appropriate level to engage a target, or shoot down a target at some time, they could have done that," he said.<br><br>And, at the time, military and civilian officials were scrambling to land all the other commercial planes in the air during the crisis - plus sort out more than a dozen false reports of additional hijackings.<br><br>"By the time [Toledo's jets] got in the air, all those four [hijacked planes] were down," Colonel Marr said. "The problem was, we didn't know those were only the four."<br><br>Another problem was that military commanders were never fully able to track all hijacked jetliners. The third flight - the one that hit the Pentagon - left NORAD's radar system shortly before it crossed the southern tip of Ohio.<br><br>That left the military relying on the FAA, which has no authority to direct military defense.<br><br>Complicating matters: Until the Sept. 11 attacks, the military relied on the FAA to ask for help before the Defense Department took action in a potential hijacking. The civilian agency, initially, was late calling key events:<br><br># Eleven minutes after American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the trade center, the FAA formally notified the military the airplane had crashed. Until then, the responding fighter jets did not know the plane had crashed.<br><br># It took three minutes after United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the trade center for the FAA to report it had been hijacked. It took an additional six minutes for the FAA to formally report the plane had crashed.<br><br>As a result, NORAD's radar system is now being expanded to complement the FAA's nationwide coverage. No one will clearly identify the blind spots that were present on Sept. 11, nor will they say how far it has been widened.<br><br>Also being re-examined is the protocol over who can respond to domestic hijackings. Until Sept 11, law enforcement handled hijackings, and the military responded only when asked and approved by the top brass.<br><br>It created a situation where military commanders had to improvise, and Toledo played right into that scenario that sunny Tuesday morning.<br><br>The base was not assigned to NORAD's regular defense network - meaning it was not supposed to even expect a call for help, military officials said.<br><br>But, with about three dozen pilots and 20 F-16s, the 180th offered the right personnel and location to intercept and, if ordered, shoot down any hijacked airliners that strayed into the Midwest.<br><br>It was not as if Toledo's personnel were oblivious to real-life action: Less than four weeks before NORAD's call, the 180th had returned from flying patrol missions in Iraq's no-fly zone.<br><br>Still, the orders that came down that Sept. 11 morning were like no others. While they practice "air interception," a typical mission focuses on either a plane ferrying drugs or enemy fighters approaching America's coasts, said Gen. Paul Sullivan, who heads all Ohio Air Guard units.<br><br>It's not to find and - potentially - shoot down airliners.<br><br>"In very general terms, they were being asked to do some very serious things when they didn't have the chance to sit down and ask the kinds of questions they would normally ask while preparing for a mission," General Sullivan said.<br><br>To Colonel Chudzinkski, the pilots must have felt that all their time and training had paid off.<br><br>"It's like preparing for a game, except it's for real," the colonel said. "For these guys, the time had finally come."<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Hugh Manatee Wins
 
Posts: 9869
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:51 pm
Location: in context
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NORAD timeline, flight 93, Toledo Air Guard

Postby BannedfromDU » Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:44 pm

Thom Hartmann (radio talk show) just said that he believes that the Kean & Hamilton (Without Precedent) book coming out about NORAD & FAA lying under oath was the reason for the premature/pumped up(phony) terror bust. He believes that this 'bust' was used to take the attention away from the TREASON and coverup, and to put the fear back into the suspicious public.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: NORAD timeline, flight 93, Toledo Air Guard

Postby chiggerbit » Mon Aug 14, 2006 2:47 pm

I suppose I should read the book before I say this, but I'm wondering if Hartman isn't giving the book a little too much credit for revealing "inside" information. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:59 pm

Monday, August 14, 2006<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Former CIA Analyst Comes Out For New 9/11 Investigations</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br><br>Bill Christison, a CIA analyst for 28 and a half years, has emerged after 5 years of downplaying 9/11 skepticism, as a proponent for new 9/11 investigations. He joins Mel Goodman, David MacMichaels and Ray McGovern as a critic of the 9/11 Commission, but goes further, endorsing some 9/11 theories, and giving them priorities;<br><br>Stop Belittling the Theories About September 11<br><br>by Bill Christison<br>www.dissidentvoice.org<br>August 14, 2006<br><br>... But on July 29 and 30, and then again on August 1, something else happened that increasing numbers of people believe is of equal importance. On these dates C-SPAN rebroadcast a panel discussion, held originally in late June... to discuss what really happened on September 11, 2001... The meeting was attended by 1,200 people interested in hearing something other than the official story of 9/11. The TV audience was evidently large enough to spur C-SPAN to broadcast the panel discussion five separate times in four days...<br><br>...Let’s address the real issues here. Why is it important that we not let the so-called conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11 be drowned out? After spending the better part of the last five years treating these theories with utmost skepticism, I have devoted serious time to actually studying them in recent months, and have also carefully watched several videos that are available on the subject. I have come to believe that significant parts of the 9/11 theories are true, and that therefore significant parts of the “official story” put out by the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission are false. I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe...<br><br>Christison had previously emerged as a critic of Bush foreign policy in Robert Greenwald's "Uncovered: the War on Iraq" - "That very first day, on September 12, one day after September 11... the meeting that was held in the White House, in the situation room... led to Rumsfeld asking the question, “Shouldn’t we use this as an opportunity to do something about Iraq as well?”" - Bill Christison.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.911blogger.com/2006/08/former-cia-analyst-comes-out-for-new.html">www.911blogger.com/2006/0...r-new.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>=========<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Gullible Americans </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>By Paul Craig Roberts <br><br>08/14/06 "Information Clearing House" -- --<br>I was in China when a July Harris Poll reported that 50 percent of Americans still believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when Bush invaded that country, and that 64 percent of Americans still believe that Saddam Hussein had strong links with Al Qaeda. <br>The Chinese leaders and intellectuals with whom I was meeting were incredulous. How could a majority of the population in an allegedly free country with an allegedly free press be so totally misinformed? The only answer I could give the Chinese is that Americans would have been the perfect population for Mao and the Gang of Four, because Americans believe anything their government tells them.<br><br>Americans never check any facts.  Who do you know, for example, who has even read the Report of the 9/11 Commission, much less checked the alleged facts reported in that document.  I can answer for you.  You don’t know anyone who has read the report or checked the facts.  <br>The two co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission Report, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, have just released a new book, “Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission.”  Kean and Hamilton reveal that the commission suppressed the fact that Muslim ire toward the US is due to US support for Israel’s persecution and dispossession of the Palestinians, not to our “freedom and democracy” as Bush propagandistically claims.  Kean and Hamilton also reveal that the US military committed perjury and lied about its failure to intercept the hijacked airliners.  The commission even debated referring the military’s lies to the Justice Department for criminal investigation.  Why should we assume that these admissions are the only coverups and lies in the 9/11 Commission Report? How do you know that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist plot?  How do you know that three World Trade Center buildings collapsed because two were hit by airliners?  You only “know” because the government gave you the explanation of what you saw on TV. (Did you even know that three WTC buildings collapsed?)<br><br>I still remember the enlightenment I experienced as a student in Russian Studies when I learned that the Czarist secret police would set off bombs and then blame those whom they wanted to arrest.. When Hitler seized dictatorial power in 1933, he told the Germans that his new powers were made necessary by a communist terrorist attack on the Reichstag.  When Hitler started World War II by invading Poland, he told the Germans that Poland had crossed the frontier and attacked Germany. Governments lie all the time--especially governments staffed by neoconservatives whose intellectual godfather, Leo Strauss, taught them that it is permissible to deceive the public in order to achieve their agenda. Some readers will write to me to say that they saw a TV documentary or read a magazine article verifying the government’s explanation of 9/11. But, of course, these Americans did not check the facts either--and neither did the people who made the documentary and wrote the magazine article.  <br><br>Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven Jones,  have raised compelling questions about the official account of the collapse of the three WTC buildings.  The basic problem for the government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen at free fall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors below.  If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed time would have been much longer.  These experts have also calculated that the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to accommodate  the government's theory of the collapse.  It is certainly a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers that the only way   buildings can collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints is by engineered demolition.  Explosives are used to remove the support of floors below before the debris from above arrives. Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall increases.  Engineered demolition also explains the symmetrical collapse of the buildings into their own foot prints. As it is otherwise improbable for every point in floors below to weaken uniformly, "pancaking" would result in asymmetrical collapse as some elements of the floor would give sooner than others.<br> <br>Scientific evidence is a tough thing for the American public to handle, and the government knows it.  The government can rely on people dismissing things that they cannot understand as "conspiracy theory."  But if you are inclined to try to make up your own mind, you can find Dr. Jones' and Dr. Woods’ papers, which have been formally presented to their peers at scientific meetings, on line at  <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.st911.org/">www.st911.org/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <br>Experts have also pointed out that the buildings' massive steel skeletons comprised a massive heat sink that wicked away the heat from the limited, short-lived fires, thus preventing a heat buildup.  Experts also point out that the short-lived, scattered, low-intensity fires could barely reach half the melting point of steel even if they burned all day instead of merely an hour. <br> <br>Don't ask me to tell you what happened on 9/11.  All I know is that the official account of the buildings' collapse is improbable.<br> <br>Now we are being told another improbable tale.  Muslim terrorists in London and Pakistan were caught plotting to commit mass murder by smuggling bottles of explosive liquids on board airliners in hand luggage. Baby formula, shampoo and water bottles allegedly contained the tools of suicide bombers.  <br>How do we know about this plot?  Well, the police learned it from an “Islamic militant arrested near the Afghan-Pakistan border several weeks ago.”  And how did someone so far away know what British-born people in London were plotting?<br>Do you really believe that Western and Israeli intelligence services, which were too incompetent to prevent the 9/11 attack, can uncover a London plot by capturing a person on the Afghan border in Pakistan? Why would “an Islamic militant” rat on such a plot even if he knew of it?<br>More probable explanations of the “plot” are readily available.  According to the August 11 Wayne Madsen Report, informed sources in the UK report that “the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor Party revolt, cleverly cooked up a new ‘terror’ scare to avert the public’s eyes away from Blair’s increasing political woes.  British law enforcement, neocon and intelligence operatives in the US, Israel, and Britain, and Rupert Murdoch’s global media empire cooked up the terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 ‘Oplan Bjinka’ plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad Yousef to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the US.” <br>There are other plausible explanations.  For example, our puppet in Pakistan decided to arrest some people who were a threat to him.  With Bush’s commitment to “building democracy in the Middle East,” our puppet can’t arrest his political enemies without cause, so he lays the blame on a plot.<br>Any testimony against Muslim plotters by “an Islamic militant” is certain to have been bought and paid for.<br>Or consider this explanation. Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush and Blair are war criminals.  Bush is so worried that he will be held accountable that he has sent his attorney general to consult with the Republican Congress to work out legislation to protect Bush retroactively from his violations of the Geneva Conventions.<br>Tony Blair is in more danger of finding himself in the dock.  Britain is signatory to a treaty that, if justice is done, will place Blair before the International Criminal Court in the Hague. <br>What better justification for the two war criminals’ illegal actions than the need to foil  dastardly plots by Muslims recruited in sting operations by Western intelligence services? The more Bush and Blair can convince their publics that terrorist danger abounds, the less likely Bush and Blair are ever to be held accountable for their crimes.  <br>But surely, some readers might object, our great moral leaders wouldn’t do something political like that!  <br>They most certainly would.  As Joshua Micah Marshall wrote in the July 7 issue of Time magazine, the suspicion is “quite reasonable” that “the Bush Administration orchestrates its terror alerts and arrests to goose the GOP’s poll numbers.” <br>Joshua Micah Marshall proves his conclusion by examining the barrage of color-coded terror alerts, none of which were real, and, yes, it all fits with political needs.  <br>And don’t forget the plot unearthed in Miami to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago. Described by Vice President Cheney as a “very real threat,” the plot turned out to be nothing more than a few harmless whackos recruited by an FBI agent sent out to organize a sting.  <br>There was also the “foiled plot” to blow up the Holland Tunnel and flood downtown New York City with sea water.  Thinking New Orleans, the FBI invented this plot without realizing that New York City is above sea level.  Of course, most Americans didn’t realize it either. <br>For six years the Bush regime has been able to count on the ignorant and naive American public to believe whatever tale that is told them.  American gullibility has yet to fail the Bush regime.<br>The government has an endless number of conspiracy theories, but only people who question the government’s conspiracies are derided for “having a conspiracy theory.”<br>The implication is even worse if we assume that the explosive bottle plot is genuine.  It means that America and Britain by their own aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and by enabling Israel’s war crimes in Palestine and Lebanon, have created such hatred that Muslims, who identify with Bush’s, Blair’s, and Israel’s victims, are plotting retaliation.  <br>But Bush is prepared.  He has taught his untutored public that “they hate us for our freedom and democracy.”<br>Gentle reader, wise up. The entire world is laughing at you.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14531.htm">www.informationclearingho...e14531.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby HMKGrey » Mon Aug 14, 2006 9:22 pm

I don't know much about Paul Craig Roberts but his pieces get better and better. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests