A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby surfaceskimmer » Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:44 pm

A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

by Anthony Lawson / March 19th, 2010

It is not a theory but a fact — one that is well known within the 9/11 truth movement — that the 9/11 Commission failed to ensure that at least one of the appropriate government agencies: the NTSB, the FBI or the FAA was commissioned to positively identify the aircraft which were allegedly involved in the murders of nearly 3,000 people, on September 11, 2001.

One does not need to be a Harvard Law School graduate to know that the first and most important requirement in any murder investigation is to determine the cause of death, which often leads to a requirement to identify, and trace to its origins, a murder weapon, or, in the case of 9/11: weapons. And there can be no doubt that each of the four planes which were allegedly hijacked on the morning of 9/11 was posited as being a murder weapon by the U.S. administration and the 9/11 Commission, yet there is absolutely nothing which firmly connects the four allegedly-hijacked planes to any of the 9/11 crash sites.

In fact, it is not fanciful to suggest that if a lawyer, even of a far lower calibre than that of an Alan Dershowitz, were engaged to defend the airport security companies that allegedly allowed 19 box-cutter-carrying Arabs to get on to those planes, he would immediately call for the dismissal of such an action on the grounds that the planes which allegedly hit the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the one which crashed near Shanksville had never been forensically identified as the planes which, allegedly, had been hijacked that morning.

And such a motion could not possibly be denied, as I will explain.

The planes in question were alleged to have been: American Airlines flight 11 (Tail Number: N334AA), North Tower; United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA), South Tower; American Airlines flight 77 (N644AA), the Pentagon, and United Airlines flight 93 (N591UA), which supposedly crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. But the truth is that they could well have been different planes that had arrived on the scenes from quite different locations, because the crash debris recovered from those four crash sites has never been forensically linked to the planes that allegedly took off from Logan International, Boston; Dulles International, Washington and Newark International, New Jersey, and which were, allegedly, hijacked shortly thereafter. Therefore, they cannot possibly be linked, without a reasonable doubt, to breaches of security at those airports.

So it would be a remarkable irony, and quite possibly a unique circumstance in the annals of American jurisprudence, if the assumptions used as reasons for launching wars against two sovereign nations, as well as the more generalised ‘War on Terror’ would not stand up as evidence in either a criminal prosecution or a civil damages suit in an American court of law.

Air-crash investigations in the United States are normally carried out by the NTSB’s air accident investigation division, and there are several documentary television series featuring this government agency’s painstaking approach when investigating the causes of air crashes. During many such investigations, serial numbers from recovered parts are cross checked with the airline-in-question’s purchase and maintenance records, to try and identify the reason for an accident, when it is suspected that mechanical failure may have been the cause.

However, the NTSB has confirmed that — apparently for the first time from its inception, in 1967, since when it has investigated more than 124,000 other aviation accidents — it took no part in investigating any of the air crashes which occurred on September 11, 2001. So the world has been asked to take it on faith and hearsay that the four planes involved were normal scheduled flights which were hijacked by Arab terrorists, some of whom, are, allegedly, still alive.

Even more disturbing is the fact that documentation exists, and is available on the Internet, which indicates that the FBI, backed up by a separate letter from the Justice Department, has refused to release any information under the Freedom of Information Act about any debris recovered from the crash sites, including the serial number of the “Black Box” Cockpit Flight Data Recorder allegedly found near the alleged crash site of United Airlines Flight 93. It may be recalled that a transcript taken from this recorder formed the basis for several TV dramas and one Academy-Award winning feature film.

By no means finally, but just as disturbing, the core of a jet engine, which can be seen in several 9/11 videos falling out of the northern face of the WTC’s South Tower, and which hit a building on its way down, and was photographed and videoed — in the presence of FBI personnel and at least one FBI vehicle — where it came to rest at the junction of Church and Murray streets, was later photographed, prior to its [alleged] burial in a land fill on Staten Island. So much for what murder investigators are usually so concerned about: The chain of custody and preservation of important evidence, pending its identification.

The events of 9/11 had consequences far beyond the destruction of life and property in the United States; they were the reasons for the launching of three wars. Yet it is obvious that a leader writer of an influential newspaper, the Washington Post, could not spare the time to look into such a serious matter — one that people with far fewer resources than he or she has access to have managed to do — before launching a scathing attack on a member of the Japanese parliament and the world-wide 9/11 truth movement, in general.

Just because the 9/11 Commission did not do its job properly is no excuse for newspaper writers not to do theirs. Unless, of course, newspapers such as the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times are playing a conscious role in a conspiracy to prevent the truth about these events from surfacing. In which case their editors and owners would almost certainly be guilty of misprision of felony.

I would like to stress that the identity of the planes is not the only reason why the 9/11 Commission’s findings should be regarded as invalid, and its members found guilty, at the very least, of gross oversights in the collection of the evidence which was used in the writing of its Final Report. Even a cursory look at the visual evidence of the collapsing World Trade Center’s Twin Towers and WTC 7 should have instilled grave doubts about the findings of some of the experts from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST.

But, for my money, the real smoking guns were, and still are, the four aircraft that were used as weapons on that terrible day, and for them not to have been identified breaks every rule in any book which seeks to teach the art of solving crimes.

Anthony Lawson is a retired, international-prize-winning TV commercials director, cameraman and editor, and a professional voiceover artist living in Thailand. His entire catalog of YouTube videos can be viewed online. Read other articles by Anthony.

This article was posted on Friday, March 19th, 2010 at 9:01am and is filed under Disinformation, FBI, Media, Propaganda.

http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/03/a-lit ... 11-planes/
User avatar
surfaceskimmer
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 6:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby chump » Wed May 04, 2011 10:19 am

This article delves into some of the research that Mike Ruppert brushed upon in his book about flight 1989 and two emergency landings at Cleveland Airport - and some things that I have seen elsewhere:

- There was NO video evidence of any of the passengers boarding their doomed flights on that day, or even of them wandering through the airport.

- There were two boardings for flight 93 in Newark.

- Flights 11 and 77 were never boarding and never departed at all (according the BTS - Bureau of Traffic Statistics.)

- Drones were implanted on the FAA's radar where flights 11 and 175 supposedly nearly collided above Stuart AFB during some of the wargames.


Above Stuart air force base we are told that flight 11 and 175 nearly collided they got so close. We were also given snippets of this through air traffic control tapes. The explanation for this is as plausible as it is logical. This is where the 2 military drones which were to strike to world trade centers took off from. They would replace the flight path of Flight 175 as well as the path of flight 11, which up to this point was provided for by an electronic warfare plane which was one of "4" such aircraft in the air for the War games which were taking place on 9/11/2001. Sometime shortly after this, Flight 175 NOW HAVING BEEN REPLACED BY A MILITARY DRONE ON RADAR will change its transponder to Delta 1989, and make an emergency landing at Cleveland, with reports of a bomb aboard. This plane would contain roughly 200 people, and not only is it plausible that these people were the people from flights 11 & 175, it is highly probable and likely. Another plane, Flight 93, would also land at Cleveland airport. This was confirmed by both the Mayor of Cleveland, and United Airlines who publicly acknowledged on 911 and confirmed flight 93 landed in Cleveland. Flight 93 would end up being sequestered at one end of the airport, at the NASA Glenn hangar, while the other flight containing the other passengers from 11 & 175, now designated as Delta 1989, would be sequestered at the other end of the airport, at the I-X Exposition center. The two flights, Delta 1989 and United flight 93 had roughly 260 some people between them, the same number as the "4" flights, 11, 175, 77 & 93.


This plausibly explains the following;
Hijacker mystery
Why the Cell phone calls needed to be made & were faked
Lack of Video of Passengers at 4 airports on 911
Why the 2 American Airlines flights, 11 & 77 show in the BTS database as not having flown
Stuart Air Force base mystery
Why there is video and photographic evidence showing both 11 & 175 to be military drones
Cleveland International Airport Mystery
Mystery of the missing people from 4 planes on 911
And it also gives an incredibly plausible explanation for the sequence of events regarding the passengers of the 4 planes and the mysteries surrounding them. All of the passengers, from 4 groups, and 3 locations, ended up in 1 central location, Cleveland International Airport. They had seamlessly & successfully disappeared.

What happened after Cleveland is anyone's guess. All air traffic was closed. If any planes flew, it is doubtful there was recordings of them, especially if they contained the passengers from any of these 4 flights. All that lied ahead of them at this point is their new lives and new identities. And as pointed out earlier, it is possible some real passengers were added to the planes, but this is beyond the scope of my research and beyond the scope of this article.

There is what I believe happened to the passengers. For the first time in 9 years I believe we have come as close as we can without a full fledged honest open inquiry into the crimes of 911 in understanding all the mysteries of the missing passengers & planes. Perhaps you believe the passengers were all real, and then eliminated afterward. Regardless of your viewpoint on this issue, I believe I have outlined the most plausible explanation as to what occurred on 9/11 regarding the 4 planes and passengers. Adapt this scenario as neccessary as it meets your knowledge of the events of 911...


Very interesting indeed. I haven't seen it posted here.

http://letsrollforums.com/index.php.

arrivederci
User avatar
chump
 
Posts: 2261
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby Lord Balto » Tue May 24, 2011 10:36 am

chump wrote:This article delves into some of the research that Mike Ruppert brushed upon in his book about flight 1989 and two emergency landings at Cleveland Airport - and some things that I have seen elsewhere:

- There was NO video evidence of any of the passengers boarding their doomed flights on that day, or even of them wandering through the airport.

arrivederci


Um, if there is no video evidence of any of the passengers in the departing airports, what is the point of this whole Cleveland Airport scenario? Again, as I have remarked before, why make things more complex than they need to be? If any of these folks ever existed, and if any of them really died, it was all done on the ground without ever having flown anywhere. Stage magicians do not go out of their way to make their illusions more complicated. That would be just silly.
User avatar
Lord Balto
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:34 pm
Location: Interzone
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby elfismiles » Tue May 24, 2011 11:02 am

Also, besides claims of the impacting objects being drones ... couldn't the extra radar blips be explained as "Radar Injects" (instead of drones), enabled by PALLADIUM technology, that were part of the various drills?
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby Lord Balto » Tue May 24, 2011 1:35 pm

elfismiles wrote:Also, besides claims of the impacting objects being drones ... couldn't the extra radar blips be explained as "Radar Injects" (instead of drones), enabled by PALLADIUM technology, that were part of the various drills?


That was the whole point of staging the "attack" with all of those exercises running. To confuse the real with the fantasy. Watch a good stage magician sometime. The first thing they do is define the reality space. "Is this real world or exercise," said the air traffic controller. "Real world," said the magician. Much as I dislike Tarpley's Neo-LaRouchie world view, he has that part dead right. Put country simple, 9/11 was a magic show.
User avatar
Lord Balto
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:34 pm
Location: Interzone
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes

Postby sunny » Fri May 27, 2011 2:13 pm

Lord Balto wrote:
chump wrote:This article delves into some of the research that Mike Ruppert brushed upon in his book about flight 1989 and two emergency landings at Cleveland Airport - and some things that I have seen elsewhere:

- There was NO video evidence of any of the passengers boarding their doomed flights on that day, or even of them wandering through the airport.

arrivederci


Um, if there is no video evidence of any of the passengers in the departing airports, what is the point of this whole Cleveland Airport scenario? Again, as I have remarked before, why make things more complex than they need to be? If any of these folks ever existed, and if any of them really died, it was all done on the ground without ever having flown anywhere. Stage magicians do not go out of their way to make their illusions more complicated. That would be just silly.


I don't know. Perhaps the charade of real flights had to be carried out at least in their initial phases. As the author said, perhaps the reason we don't have video of the folks--some of whom, like David Angel and that blonde right-wing wife of the Solicitor General, were demonstrably real-- is because, unsuspecting or not, they were directed to the wrong area of the airport to board the designated flights.

I can imagine SOME of the passengers were in on it and wanted to disappear for one reason or another. In which case, boarding flights that converged in Cleveland to consolidate the willing passengers on to two planes that would take them to their secret destinations would make sense. I have my doubts that there were any UNwilling passengers since there were weirdly so few people on all of the four flights combined. It would be easy to bump unsuspecting folks to unrelated flights, or warn them off altogether like they did with Mayor Brown.
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)


Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests