Re: Where Did The Towers Go?
Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:03 pm
The problem I have with drawing conclusions from the inability of nanothermite to cause all of the results seen on 9/11 is that these conclusions commonly do not account for the presence of the nanothermite itself, which has been demonstrated rather conclusively by Jones, et al. In my estimation, the presence of nanothermite, at the very least, suggests the presence of persons currently unknown in the towers before the events of 9/11. Whatever the ultimate reason for the use of nanothermite, it must be seen as part of a larger and more complex operation. This is the problem with most theories about 9/11. They tend to try to explain all of the symptoms by a single cause, whereas it must be assumed that the events consisted of a complex series of interrelated subevents carried out by a number of different teams using varying methods and technologies.
As for the reason for the presence of the nanothermite itself, might I suggest that it was used to carve out the quite ridiculous outline of the plane in the side of the building?
As for the reason for the presence of the nanothermite itself, might I suggest that it was used to carve out the quite ridiculous outline of the plane in the side of the building?