9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHOWBIZ

Moderators: DrVolin, 82_28, stillrobertpaulsen, Jeff

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby NewKid » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:15 pm

Sheen by himself can be dismissed. But there is a little evidence for a turning the corner argument with NY magazine doing a piece, air america folks talking about, Paul Craig Roberts, etc. <br><br>Whatever happens 9-11 won't be investigated again I'm pretty damn sure. I can see them engineering Bush out of office prematurely or something, but the problem is that if any sort of conspiracy is acceptable conversation, then all the pundits can never be trusted again. All the experts who told us it was 19 hijackers with such confidence. The whole 'it's never a conspiracy theory' paradigm is in doubt. Kennedy, MLK, OK City, etc. It does terrible damage to the institutional credibility of the American govt. <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby Gouda » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:30 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/march2006/230306sheen1.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br>Think Charlie can rap like Flavor Flav?<br><br>*****<br><br>Yo Gee<br>Come and get your new york post<br>New york post right here<br>Come on y’all<br>Get the bost stubost stubost<br>Coasta coasta new york post<br>Yo new york post don’t brag or boast<br>Dissin’ flavor when he’s butter that you put on your toast<br>Put my address in the paper cause I smacked that girl<br>She’s the mother of my kid’s that I took around the world<br>Disagreements having scuffles when you share upon<br>You shouldn’t try to drain subjects in a duck pond<br>If you’re gonna tell a story about people’s worries<br>Watch what you tell ’em cause they don’t bring you glory<br>It only brings agony, ask james cagney<br>He beat up on a guy when he found he was a fagney<br>Cagney is a favorite he is my boy<br>He don’t jive around he’s a real mccoy<br>Chuck d yeah, you tellin’ flav we got to let ’em know<br>Here’s a letter to the new york post<br>The worst piece of paper on the east coast<br>Matter of fact the whole state’s forty cents<br>In new york city fifty cents elsewhere<br>It makes no goddamn sense at all<br>America’s oldest continuously published daily piece of bullshit<br>Flavor flav is the one that makes the post money<br>Writers making violence in headlines funny<br>Tryin’ to undress my past until it’s naked<br>Post got flavor from sellin’ no records<br>Europe asia to the street of new york<br>Flavor flav known for his finesse talk<br>Do it to ya for the post to employ me<br>New york post can’t destroy me<br>Rapper of public enemy, rapstar beats lover<br>With the headline of a fucked up cover<br>Out the pot took plate new york post<br>Get your story straight motherfucker<br>It always seem they make our neighborhood look bad<br>Here’s a letter to the new york post<br>Ain’t worth the paper it’s printed on<br>Founded in 1801 by alexander hamilton<br>That is 190 years continuous of fucked up news<br>Yo one can play the game, two can play the game<br>Yo flav read on can’t forget you either jet<br>Flavor flav is your best jet yet<br>My own people own the most business<br>Write on faith of value’sness<br>Should have checked with me before you wrote it<br>Got it from another source and quote it<br>Put it out like the new year bull drop<br>In every beauty parlor and barber shop<br>Flavor flav world renown<br>Can’t keep a man like flavor down<br>Yo jet be a good host<br>Don’t print bull like the new york post<br>Augh, looks like somebody slipped up here<br>Anyway here’s a letter to the new york post<br>Black newspaper and magazines are supposed to get the real deal from the source y’all<br>Sorry, jet you took the info straight out of the post<br>Burned us just like toast<br>When it comes to getting you facts straight about p.e.<br>Get your shit correct<br><br>- Public Enemy (Drayton - Gary G-Wiz - Robertz) <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby NewKid » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:32 pm

That looks like a wig. Does he wear a rug? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby NewKid » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:54 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I think Tarpley is onto something...and I don't even trust Tarpley. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I don't think I do either. But I'm not really sure why. What do you know about him? <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby Dreams End » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:01 pm

He spent many years with Larouche, including hosting a radio show for him. Larouche organization has VERY sophisticated disinfo. So, they have officially parted ways, but I'm not convinced. I'll give the Larouchians this...they know where the action is...but what do they do when they get there?<br><br>Case in point, The Larouchians were big on the SRA story...."Is Satan in your schoolyard" etc. And DeCamp, who did all the Franklin coverup stuff, was crediting Anton Chaitkin as a valuable collaborator... Chaitkin is still with Larouche.<br><br>There's a Larouche thread in the data dump or somewhere.<br><br>I've never read an explanation from Tarpley about why he worked with Larouche and why they parted ways. I'm sure one exists, and I'd be interested to see it. But he IS a very good researcher which means he had to know what they were up to when he was with LL. <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby NewKid » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:04 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>There's a Larouche thread in the data dump or somewhere.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I need to read it. Larouche is a riddle, wrapped inside an enigma, inside of whatever. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Post vs. Sheen

Postby shawshank erection » Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:09 pm

about the references to National Geographic.<br><br>William Burroughs said that he thought NG would provide the perfect front for intelligence agencies. <p></p><i></i>
shawshank erection
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 6:10 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby Qutb » Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:57 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>but ultimately betrayed her real intent by saying she really hopes conspiracy theories don't catch on<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br>So that's why she's probably a spook. Glad we cleared that up. <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Tarpley

Postby Qutb » Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:01 pm

About Tarpley's "open letter"... he says: <br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>I would invite you to interpret this important signal piece as a warning issued by a section of the US ruling elite of their readiness to use some form of revisionist exposé of the real story of 9/11 as a political weapon<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>maybe it's just me, but my interpretation of this Jacobson and his article was a guy trying to make sense of the "Truth Movement" and looking at it with an open but skeptical mind. Of course he could have focused on other questions, but he brought up the ones that are most commonly emphasized by the Truthers themselves, which you can hardly blame him for. He probably hasn't spent four years in front of a computer "investigating" 9/11, after all.<br><br>Unless Tarpley knows something I don't, there's no basis whatsoever for saying what he says. <br><br>This is what bores me with much conspiratological thinking (not all, but much of it). Everything has to be interpreted as a piece of a larger puzzle, or as directed by dark actors behind the curtain pulling strings, regardless of whether there is any evidence of that or any good reason to think so. Sometimes an article is just an article.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>The 9/11 truth movement is now offered a perhaps unique opportunity to change the course of world history for the better.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->Delusions of grandeur - if there isn't some ulterior agenda at work here (there's me thinking conspiratologically myself, admittedly... but with a former? Larouchie, I think that's excusable).<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>This can be done by mobilizing world public opinion on the basis of a unifying political platform of full MIHOP, identifying the September criminals as intelligence networks inside the US-UK military/security bureaucracy, exercising control above and behind the Bush-Cheney White House and Tony Blair’s 10 Downing Street.<br><br>The overriding POLITICAL issue at hand is the reality of MIHOP, the key to avoiding opportunism on the one hand and the sectarianism of purely technical disputes on the other. It is time to direct all available polemical energies outward, towards breaking the influence of the gatekeepers on the left and the right, and towards maximizing the political impact of the 9/11 scandal.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I'm nowhere near sold on the so-called reality of "full MIHOP". And I'm not willing to trust Tarpley on the issue. I find his insistance on the necessity of uniting behind the "full MIHOP" banner suspicious. Maybe he knows something I don't though - perhaps his buddy, general <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.axisforpeace.net/article354.html" target="top">Ivashov</a><!--EZCODE LINK END-->, has confided him some secrets? You know, the Russian general who allegedly is of the opinion that "America must be destroyed", who's been a "consultant" for Alexandr Dugin, who co-organized the "Pristina dash" in Kosovo with the drug-connected general Kvashnin. I'm sure he agrees about "maximizing the political impact of the 9/11 scandal"...<br><br>(By the way, the list of panelists and speakers at that "Axis for Peace" conference is quite interesting. In addition to Tarpley and Ivashov, there's Helga Zepp-LaRouche, Christopher Bollyn, Andreas von Bülow (German spook and aristocrat), Philip Berg (the guy with that ridiculous RICO suit), alongside CFR member John D. Anthony, an Iraqi former OPEC legal advisor and Oil for Food envoy, the vice president of the Saudi Association for Media and Communication... a motley crew, one might say) <br> <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby HMKGrey » Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:26 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>William Burroughs said that he thought NG would provide the perfect front for intelligence agencies.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Ah. How I wish Burroughs was alive today to give us his take on this. Man, he had so much dialed. <br><br>But anyway: Charlie Sheen as 9-11 Truth flag bearer? <br><br>Why not? <br><br>It's fascinating that it's on CNN. We could talk about just that fact for hours. I don't neccesarily buy Tarpley's angle wholesale but there's a strange logic to it. If Cheney gets out of hand (and there's plenty of evidence that he's way past that already) then why wouldn't some powerful faction fire a shot across his bows? After all, it's pretty unlikely that there's just this one ultra nasty cabal of people running the show and no wannabe's, right? As bad as the Bushista's have been all these years, you just know that there's gotta be plenty of would-be crime families with repsectable backgrounds and plenty of money just waiting in the wings. <br><br>In my experience, no one ever has a monopoly on anything. <br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby BannedfromDU » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:06 pm

QUICKVOTE<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks?</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Yes 59%<br><br>No 41%<br><br>------------------------<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/showbiz.tonight/">edition.cnn.com/CNN/Progr...z.tonight/</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>======================<br>-Poll on left column <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby Qutb » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:07 pm

HMK, I agree. That's the theme of Dave Emory's <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.wfmu.org/playlists/DX" target="top">latest</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> episode, entitled "leaks". His theory/suggestion is that powerful forces within the security/intelligence establishment are giving Bush/Cheney the Nixon treatment. As always, an interesting listen and a slightly different take on things (recorded in february 2006, not 2005 as he erroneously says).<br><br>It <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>was</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> slightly surreal to see that on CNN. It was almost as if they were going out of their way to make Charlie Sheen come across as more credible and reasonable than he would if they had let his words speak for themselves. Weird. <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby Dreams End » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:27 pm

National Geographic? Propaganda? Nah...<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B00009RXI5.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Dreams End
 

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby FourthBase » Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:24 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/CNN/anchors_reporters/hammer.a.j..html">edition.cnn.com/CNN/ancho....a.j..html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
FourthBase
 
Posts: 6669
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 4:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: 9/11 inside job Charlie Sheen VIDEO BROADCAST on CNN SHO

Postby BannedfromDU » Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:48 pm

Watch CNN Headline news show- "SHOWBIZ Tonight at 11pm est. for a follow-up interview on the subject. <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest