"Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hamilton

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

"Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hamilton

Postby BannedfromDU » Fri Aug 04, 2006 7:11 pm

New Book: "Without Precedent", By Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Book: 9/11 panel doubted Pentagon's story about response</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>8/4/2006, 3:04 p.m. ET<br>By HOPE YEN<br>The Associated Press                <br><br>WASHINGTON (AP) — <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception, the panel's chairmen say in a new book.<br><br>Republican Thomas Kean and Democrat Lee Hamilton also say in "Without Precedent" that their panel was too soft in questioning former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani — and that the 20-month investigation may have suffered for it.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>The book, a behind-the-scenes look at the investigation,<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong> recounts obstacles the authors say were thrown up by the Bush administration, internal disputes over President Bush's use of the attacks as a reason for invading Iraq, and the way the final report avoided questioning whether U.S. policy in the Middle East may have contributed to the attacks.<br><br>Kean and Hamilton said the commission found it mind-boggling that authorities had asserted during hearings that their air defenses had reacted quickly and were prepared to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93, which appeared headed toward Washington.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>In fact, the commission determined — after it subpoenaed audiotapes and e-mails of the sequence of events — that the shootdown order did not reach North American Aerospace Command pilots until after all of the hijacked planes had crashed.<br><br>The book states that commission staff,<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong> "exceedingly frustrated" by what they thought could be deception, proposed a full review into why the FAA and the Pentagon's NORAD had presented inaccurate information. That ultimately could have led to sanctions.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Due to a lack of time, the panel ultimately referred the matter to the inspectors general at the Pentagon and Transportation Department. Both are preparing reports, spokesmen said this week.<br><br>"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue," the book states.<br><br>The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton "a low point" in the commission's examination of witnesses during public hearings. "We did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put on the public record," they wrote.<br><br>Commission members backed off, Kean and Hamilton said, after drawing criticism in newspaper editorials for sharp questioning of New York fire and police officials at earlier hearings. The editorials said the commission was insensitive to the officials' bravery on the day of the attacks.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"It proved difficult, if not impossible, to raise hard questions about 9/11 in New York without it being perceived as criticism of the individual police and firefighters or of Mayor Giuliani," Kean and Hamilton said.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Congress established the commission in 2002 to investigate government missteps leading to the Sept. 11 attacks. Its 567-page unanimous report, which was released in July 2004 and became a national best seller, does not blame Bush or former President Clinton but does say they failed to make anti-terrorism a high priority before the attacks.<br><br>The panel of five Republicans and five Democrats also concluded that the Sept. 11 attacks would not be the nation's last, noting that al-Qaida had tried for at least 10 years to acquire weapons of mass destruction.<br><br>In their book, which goes on sale Aug. 15, Kean and Hamilton recap obstacles they say the panel faced in putting out a credible report in a presidential election year, including fights for access to government documents and an effort to reach unanimity.<br><br>Among the issues:<br><br>• Iraq. The commission threatened to splinter over the question of investigating the administration's use of 9/11 as a reason for going to war. The strongest proponent was original member Max Cleland, a Democratic former senator who later stepped down for separate reasons.<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>If Cleland had not resigned, the commission probably would not have reached unanimity</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, according to the book. Ultimately, commissioners decided to touch briefly on the Iraq war by concluding there was no "collaborative relationship" between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaida; the administration had asserted there were substantial contacts between the two.<br><br>• Israel. The commission disagreed as to how to characterize al-Qaida's motives for attacking the U.S., with Hamilton arguing that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the presence of U.S. forces in the Middle East were major contributors.<br><br>Unidentified members believed that "listing U.S. support for Israel as a root cause of al-Qaida's opposition to the United States indicated that the United States should reassess that policy," which those commission members did not want.<br><br>Ultimately, the panel made a brief statement noting that U.S. policy regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Iraq are "dominant staples of popular commentary across the Arab and Muslim world."<br><br>• Access to detainees. The panel pushed for direct access to detainees, at one point proposing to be at least physically present or to listen by telephone during interrogations so they could gauge credibility and get unvarnished accounts.<br><br>The administration resisted, citing concerns about national security. Officials also said they feared setting a precedent of access by a nongovernment entity that could undermine the administration's position that the Geneva Conventions did not apply to detainees classified as "enemy combatants."<br><br>The commission agreed to submit questions and receive written responses. Later, allegations emerged of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay that probably played a factor in the government's resistance, the book states.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.silive.com/newsflash/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-19/1154718261302960.xml&storylist=simetro&thispage=1">www.silive.com/newsflash/metro/inde...etro&thispage=1</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=bannedfromdu>BannedfromDU</A> at: 8/4/06 5:12 pm<br></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:21 pm

Open Letter: 9/11 Widows Issue Statement Re. Pentagon Deception & 9/11 Commission        <br>Friday, August 04, 2006 - 03:44 PM<br>Posted by: khence<br>Statement Regarding Pentagon’s Alleged Deception <br>August 4, 2006 <br><br>====== <br><br>Mandate of the 9/11 Commission <br><br>The 9/11 Independent Commission was established by law to “... ascertain, evaluate, and report on the evidence developed by all relevant governmental agencies regarding the facts and circumstances surrounding the attacks;...“make a full and complete accounting of the circumstances surrounding the attacks, and the extent of the United States' preparedness for, and immediate response to, the attacks...” <br><br>====== <br><br>Recent stories in the Washington Post, the New York Times, as well as the release of the transcripts of the NORAD tapes in Vanity Fair, clearly show that the 9/11 Commission failed in its duties. <br><br>According to current reports, the Commission knew that it had been deceived by NORAD. In May 2003, representatives of NORAD testified, in full regalia, before the 9/11 Commission equipped with an easel and visual aids to highlight NORAD’s timeline for the day of 9/11. In June 2004, NORAD testified again, changing its previous testimony. The new timeline blamed the lack of military response on late notification by the FAA. The Commissioners never determined or explained why there was a discrepancy between the two sets of testimonies. Governor Kean is quoted in the Washington Post article as saying "we, to this day don't know why NORAD told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth ... It's one of those loose ends that never got tied". <br><br>The fact that the Commission did not see fit to tie up all loose ends in their final report or to hold those who came before them accountable for lying and/or making misleading statements puts into question the veracity of the entire Commission’s report. Individuals who came before the Commission to testify, after NORAD’s appearance, had no reason to state the truth. It was abundantly clear that there would be no repercussions for any misrepresentations. <br><br>Furthermore, the lack of tenacity and curiosity, by the Commissioners themselves, to determine why NORAD had deceived them is unconscionable. Knowing full well that the lack of military response was such a critical failure, begs the question of whether that same lack of tenacity and curiosity was applied to other critical areas of the 9/11 investigation. <br><br>We fought to establish the 9/11 Independent Commission because we believed that American citizens would be better served if our nation’s vulnerabilities were uncovered and then fixed. <br><br>Unfortunately, once again the failure to fully and properly investigate all areas, not follow all leads and not address the need for accountability, whether it be bureaucrats lying at a hearing or personnel with questionable performance of assigned duties, continues to leave this Nation and its citizens vulnerable and at risk. <br><br>The 9/11 Commission was derelict in its duties. What we needed from them was a thorough investigation into the events of September 11th. Inexcusably, five years later, we still do. <br><br><br>Patty Casazza <br><br>Monica Gabrielle <br><br>Mindy Kleinberg <br><br>Lorie Van Auken<br><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=913&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0">***LINK***</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby HMKGrey » Sat Aug 05, 2006 2:25 pm

We should send these gals some flowers. We really should. <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:04 pm

Video Clip-<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Giuliani before the 9/11 Omission w/ Kean & Hamilton-</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Victims families of the world trade center diaster protested the 911 Commission and were denied to ask questions about September the 11th.<br><br>One woman, whose brother was a fireman, said, "Let us ask the real questions." The audience began clapping.<br><br>A man repeatedly said, "remember this, your government trained and funded Al-Qaeda." The crowd, most of whom are 911 victims relatives, started clapping again. 911 Chairman Thomas Kean told the crowd if you want to be disruptive, you'll be removed from this room<br>Victims families were denied the right to ask real questions.<br><br>video clip-<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2005/12/most-important-911-video-you-will-ever.html">fpiarticle.blogspot.com/2...-ever.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:48 pm

Kean and Hamilton were both part of the problem in the failure of the commission to do a real investigation. What balls for them to come out now and say this now. <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:10 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Senator Dayton: NORAD Lied About 9/11</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Sunday, August 1, 2004<br>By Nicholas Levis<br><br>Mark Dayton has become the first U.S. senator to challenge the rush to consensus that "The 9/11 Commission Report" settles the open questions of Sept. 11, 2001.<br>In hearings last Friday, Sen. Dayton (D-MN) raised an obvious point: if the timeline of air defense response as promoted in the Kean Commission's best-selling book is correct, then the timeline presented repeatedly by NORAD during the last two years was completely wrong. Yet now no one at NORAD is willing to comment on their own timeline!<br>When the official story of 9/11 can be changed repeatedly without anyone ever being held accountable, we have no right to ever again expect honest government. Please read the following story and do your part to support Sen. Dayton for highlighting the contradiction, and to encourage the media to follow up.<br><br>See Transcript of Sen. Dayton's remarks of July 31.<br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040805095600503">www.911truth.org/article....5095600503</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>----<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Background: Evolution of the Official Story</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>FULL-<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040731213239607">www.911truth.org/article....1213239607</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>=============<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.willthomas.net/images/tn-standdown.gif"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br>*Listen To STAND DOWN *- Windows Media<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.willthomas.net/911/911_Stand_Down.htm">***LINK***</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby StarmanSkye » Sat Aug 05, 2006 5:32 pm

Chiggerbit astutely remarked:<br>"Kean and Hamilton were both part of the problem in the failure of the commission to do a real investigation. What balls for them to come out now and say this now."<br><br>***<br>THANKS for saying this so clearly -- It sure needs sayin. <br><br>This has bugged me since this 'story' first appeared, wot, about a week ago? (cynical/sarcastic paraphrase): "Gosh, we wuz shure troubled to find inconsistencies and a changing story/timeline/testimony. It almost seemed like we wuz *lied* <gasp!> to. But we didn't want to make waves (what with dis nation under attack by these turrible terrrrroristas and whatnot -- we palmed-off the *apparant* dilemna on the justice Dept. to waffle over and fumble."<br><br>Bastards.<br><br>They sure weren't on the side of Justice and truth. (What 'master' does that leave for them to serve, c/o 'National (in)Security'?)<br><br>Gotta keep the convoluted history of lies and special interest scams & rackets well-hidden and protected, dontcha know.<br><br>Like the Warren Commission -- the 911 Commission's prime job was to direct and channel the 'investigation' into acceptable questions and 'findings'.<br><br>NoBody was found responsible for an unprecedented security 'failure' (sort of like the post-Katrina response).<br><br>Hatz-off to the outspoken and courageous 911 Victim families and the women who wouldn't be intimidated, sidetracked, or shut-up, and who helped get the 911 Truth movement really rolling by standing-up to the gummint toadies, fraudsters, shills and apologists.<br><br>Rekindles my faith in the inherant decency and honour of the ordinary person when faced by a monstrous injustice.<br><br>One decent upright citizen is worth a coupla hunnert dozen self-rightous poseur politicians ennyday --unless yer feeding pigs or alligators. (then, volume over quality rules).<br><br>Starman <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:49 pm

By any chance is that Kean's son, Thomas Kean, Jr., who is running for the Senate in New Jersey? Or, is that this Kean? Is this sudden "We wuz fooled" indicative of panic, as a result of the new Lieberman effect? <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 8/5/06 4:59 pm<br></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:16 pm

From Wiki:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Kean has a wife, Deborah, a daughter, Alexandra, and twin sons, Tom and Reed. They live in Bedminster Township, New Jersey. Kean's son Tom, Jr. is a New Jersey State Senator, representing New Jersey's 21st district, and is the Republican Senatorial nominee who will face off against Robert Menendez in the November 2006 general election.<br><br>Kean is a member of the board of directors of ARAMARK and CIT Group Incorporated<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Again, from Wiki, on ARAMARK:<br><br>"....Part of Aramark's business involves prison catering and prison shops. The group "Campaign Against Prison Slavery" alleges that while serving this "captive market," Aramark billed Ohio's prisons as if had served 4,462,649 meals instead of the 2,803,722 meals actually served. The difference could represent an over-billing of some $2.08 million. Aramark subsequently lost the contract in 2000 when State employees put in a bid that was one million dollars lower than the company's bid.[3]<br><br>In addition to prisons, Aramark supplies catering services to many universities and colleges across North America. In this capacity they have been criticized for entering into secret, exclusive contracts with administrations without the consult or input of student organizations. Many schools have adopted mandatory Aramark "meal plan" requirements for living in on-campus residence halls, including the University of Alberta's Lister Center Residence and Brandeis University. Aramark school contracts are typically restrictive to the point where they require that the university use the company's services to provide all food on campus. Students have been required to ask Aramark for permission before baking their own snacks for social events, and barred from buying food items at grocery stores for use at student meetings because of university contractual obligations with Aramark.[4]<br><br>Aramark has a lengthy history of employee abuses, including an insistence on paying only minimum wage, denial of seniority and job security, denial of consistent hours and scheduling, and insufficient health coverage. Maria Garcia, a representative of a student group dedicated to protecting employee rights at the Claremont Colleges, claims that Aramark uses a "divide and conquer" method to control its employees, turning the few well-paid employees against their lower-paid co-workers....."<br><br> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=chiggerbit@rigorousintuition>chiggerbit</A> at: 8/5/06 5:28 pm<br></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby chiggerbit » Sat Aug 05, 2006 7:39 pm

Also interesting are some other of Kean's business ties.<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.rawstory.com/exclusives/moon/thomas_kean_record.htm">www.rawstory.com/exclusiv...record.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br> <p></p><i></i>
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

DIRTY KEAN

Postby dbeach » Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:59 pm

Kean has his fingers in lots of pies including peddlin food to prisons and colleges...and was also sellin food at WTC..<br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramark">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramark</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>"Part of Aramark's business involves prison catering and prison shops. The group "Campaign Against Prison Slavery" alleges that while serving this "captive market," Aramark billed Ohio's prisons as if had served 4,462,649 meals instead of the 2,803,722 meals actually served. The difference could represent an over-billing of some $2.08 million. Aramark subsequently lost the contract in 2000 when State employees put in a bid that was one million dollars lower than the company's bid.[3]<br><br>In addition to prisons, Aramark supplies catering services to many universities and colleges across North America. In this capacity they have been criticized for entering into secret, exclusive contracts with administrations without the consult or input of student organizations. Many schools have adopted mandatory Aramark "meal plan" requirements for living in on-campus residence halls, including the University of Alberta's Lister Center Residence and Brandeis University. Aramark school contracts are typically restrictive to the point where they require that the university use the company's services to provide all food on campus. Students have been required to ask Aramark for permission before baking their own snacks for social events, and barred from buying food items at grocery stores for use at student meetings because of university contractual obligations with Aramark.[4]<br><br>Aramark has a lengthy history of employee abuses, including an insistence on paying only minimum wage, denial of seniority and job security, denial of consistent hours and scheduling, and insufficient health coverage. Maria Garcia, a representative of a student group dedicated to protecting employee rights at the Claremont Colleges, claims that Aramark uses a "divide and conquer" method to control its employees, turning the few well-paid employees against their lower-paid co-workers.[5]<br><br>Although in the past it was fairly common for college dining to be handled in-house, or by smaller companies serving small geographic markets, the university food services industry could today be described as an oligopoly, increasingly dominated by just three giants: Aramark, Sodexho, and Compass Group. Former food service business owner T.J. MacDermott described the situation<br><br>"I would say that 90 percent of all contractors at colleges use the Big Three, [and] it's intensifying. It's reached a point now that when contracts are negotiated they'll offer a no-strings attachment, which includes a $50,000 to $150,000 cash payment that goes to the college's treasury. It's as good as being a star second baseman. We think that it's money for nothing. There's no repayment requirement. It's like a gift. The financial competition among the Big Three essentially freezes out the smaller independents."[6] "<br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://killtown.911review.org/buffett.html">killtown.911review.org/buffett.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>"&#9658; President Bush named former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, a moderate Republican with a record of bipartisan cooperation, to replace Henry Kissinger as head of the panel investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.<br>He serves on several corporate boards, including those of the international petroleum company Amerada Hess Corp., the Pepsi Bottling Group and Aramark Corp., which manages food and support services at office buildings, sports arenas and other facilities.<br>Aramark ran the food court on top of 2 World Trade Center as well as concessions and tours of the observation deck. Several of its employees died in the tower. Also, Kean has long served as director of Fiduciary Trust Co., a financial company that lost 87 employees in the World Trade Center.<br>Kristen Breitweiser, whose husband died in the trade center Sept. 11 while working for Fiduciary Trust and who is a leader of September 11th Advocates, said about Kean, "Assuming he has no conflicts, I hope he can do the job that needs to be done."<br>Breitweiser noted that Fiduciary was a leaseholder of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which would be part of the investigation. -USA Today (12/16/02)"<br><br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.325collective.com/prisons_aramark.html">www.325collective.com/pri...amark.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>"Aramark - The Prison Service’s Company Store<br><br>In the 19th century, Irish immigrants in Argentina, who fled there to escape poverty and starvation, were lured to huge and remote estancias [ranches] with the promise of work. Here, isolated and vulnerable, they were rapidly forced into debt by the over-inflated prices of the company store, and many were compelled to sign away their very freedom and become company slaves. A “lucky” few escaped, but still far from home they were forced to live a desperate life, searching for discarded food in the bins of Buenos Aires or selling their bodies for a crust of bread, many eventually succumbing to starvation, and dying in gutters far away from their native land. Similar scenarios were played out elsewhere. The company store is a cornerstone of freebooting capitalism, earning it a special place in the pantheon of working-class hatred. It features in literature and song. With this and the workhouse there’s little wonder that to this day most working class people still have an all-pervading fear of debt.<br><br>Company stores undoubtedly still exist to exploit workers on the wild frontiers of capitalism, and it’s not all that long ago that British pit-villages were subject to this enforced monopoly. When it comes to actual enslavement though, modern first-world capitalism is generally more subtle, seducing us into a lifetime of wage slavery by the creation and manipulation of desires for an ever-growing range of commodities. However, there’s one place in the world where slavery is still regarded as entirely acceptable, indeed where it is flourishing as never before, led like so many things by the ubiquitous forces of American capital. Having plundered the third world with impunity for so long, first-world capitalism has now turned its attention to the incarcerated working class in its own prisons, potentially a rich source of exploitable labour.<br><br>For all the talk of the liberties supposedly enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights and the domestic Human Rights Act, many of them evaporate in the fine print, and prisoners are given few rights at all. Even forced labour is considered entirely acceptable.<br><br>As in prisons elsewhere, compulsory work has long been an intrinsic part of the British penal experience, but the prisoncrats have rarely had the audacity to imagine they could turn a profit from a belligerent workforce. All that has changed with the establishment of a Prison Industrial Complex based upon the American blueprint, a model of repression being taken up across Europe and beyond. For much of the past decade, British prisoners have been subdued and manipulated, coerced and tricked into a compliant state, not least through the Incentives and Earned Privileges (IEP) Scheme, one of the state’s more subtle and ingenious methods of subjugation. Prisoners are now ripe for exploitation by private capital.<br><br>The private prison companies are making profits as never before; they have a big investment in New Labour’s Draconian penal policies in every sense, initially subsidising a massive prison building programme, while reaping enormous profits in return. Group 4’s Altcourse Prison, for example, has paid for itself in only 3 years, with the next 22 years of its contract being pure profit for the company.<br><br>Increasingly, these companies are also able to make a fast buck from forced prison labour, doubly exploiting those they incarcerate. Last year prison labour made £52.9 million for private companies and for the State."<br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DIRTY KEAN

Postby BannedfromDU » Sun Aug 06, 2006 12:43 pm

VIDEO CSPAN - his speech<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>BOWMAN FOR CONGRESS- Video of 9/11 speech-</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Bowman discusses the ignorance surrounding the events of 9/11 and its aftermath and details the NORAD cover-up surrounding intercept procedures that were not properly executed on that day - drawing from his own experience as an Air Force pilot and his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Cal-Tech. <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6347432752334298937&q=Bob+Bowman">video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=...mp;q=Bob+Bowman</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><br>===============<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney Main 9/11 Suspect</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Official version of events a conspiracy theory, says drills were cover for attacks<br><br>April 4 2006<br><br>The former head of the Star Wars missile defense program under Presidents Ford and Carter has gone public to say that the official version of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory and his main suspect for the architect of the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.<br><br>Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, ret. flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam. He is the recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, the George F. Kennan Peace Prize, the President’s Medal of Veterans for Peace, the Society of Military Engineers Gold Medal (twice), six Air Medals, and dozens of other awards and honors. His Ph.D. is in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from Caltech. He chaired 8 major international conferences, and is one of the country’s foremost experts on National Security.<br><br>Bowman worked secretly for the US government on the Star Wars project and was the first to coin the very term in a 1977 secret memo. After Bowman realized that the program was only ever intended to be used as an aggressive and not defensive tool, as part of a plan to initiate a nuclear war with the Soviets, he left the program and campaigned against it.<br><br>In an interview with The Alex Jones Show aired nationally on the GCN Radio Network, Bowman (pictured below) stated that at the bare minimum if Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were involved in 9/11 then the government stood down and allowed the attacks to happen. He said it is plausible that the entire chain of military command were unaware of what was taking place and were used as tools by the people pulling the strings behind the attack. Bowman outlined how the drills on the morning of 9/11 that simulated planes crashing into buildings on the east coast were used as a cover to dupe unwitting air defense personnel into not responding quickly enough to stop the attack. "The exercises that went on thatmorning simulating the exact kind of thing that was happening so confused the people in the FAA and NORAD....that they didn't they didn't know what was real and what was part of the exercise," said Bowman<br>"I think the people who planned and carried out those exercises, they're the ones that should be the object of investigation."<br><br>Full-<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/040406mainsuspect.htm">www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april...mainsuspect.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>===========<br><br>AUDIO-<br>Lt. Col. Dr. Robert Bowman<br>Alex speaks with the President of the Institute for Space and Security Studies, Executive Vice President of Millennium III Corporation, and current Reform Party Presidential Candidate who has recently joined the ranks of many other high-profile personalities and made public statements concerning the government's envolvement in 9/11.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/030406bowman.htm">prisonplanet.tv/audio/030406bowman.htm</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>===========<br>VIDEO- Bowman at 9/11 Truth conf. 2 yrs. ago<br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Dr. Robert M. Bowman Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD and retired Lt. Col for United States Air Force, a combat pilot who flew 101 ... all » missions in the Vietnam War, now a peace-activist criticizing the Star-Wars-program, talks about the impossibility of the official government story and the subsequent widespread and systematic destruction of evidence and cover-up. He also asks us to look at who benefited from 9/11.<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674&q=Bowman<br>">video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674&q=Bowman<br></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DIRTY KEAN

Postby HMKGrey » Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:10 pm

Hang the bastards. <br><br>Meanwhile, does anyone know if the book talks about their unprecedented interview with old Chimpy & Dr Evil? Y'know the one which Bush wriggled and wriggled to avoid and then allowed: one hour, with Cheney at his side, no oaths, no notes, no recordings and only select members of teh commission present... <br><br>Yeah, that one. <br><br>Maybe hanging's too good for 'em. <p></p><i></i>
HMKGrey
 
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 6:56 pm
Location: West Coast
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DIRTY KEAN

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Sun Aug 06, 2006 2:21 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"Yeah, that one."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>People need to <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>really</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> not want to see, to not see how strange and wrong that was. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "Without Precedent", By T. Kean & Lee Hami

Postby BannedfromDU » Sun Aug 06, 2006 3:17 pm

<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Dr. David Ray Griffen Analyzes the 9/11 Commission Report</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>VIDEO- 7:20 min.<br>Compromised members and lack of investigation<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0YZFCoMnFo">www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0YZFCoMnFo</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=bannedfromdu>BannedfromDU</A> at: 8/6/06 1:32 pm<br></i>
BannedfromDU
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:41 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to 9/11

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests