Film: September 11, 2001: What We Saw

[sijepuis]

I'm breaking my own rules, again, for steering clear of the physical evidence debate : / but the film linked below was first posted Monday [09.11.06] and I haven't seen mention of it here since. 'Thought it might interest those of you who are following the cd angle ... <br><br>nb: requires QuickTime reader.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article14943.htm">September 11, 2001: What We Saw</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>

[5E6A]

Why have all the most interesting parts been edited out? All indications were that the camera microphone would have picked up the incoming engine howl. They were also filming the already struck tower with a fairly wide shot. Yet, no sound of a jet coming in, just a jump cut from placid to post impact. Censored? Synchronicity that the tape got chewed there so it forced the edit??? Is it me, or did the part where both collapses begin also fall to the cutting room floor for whatever reason? I want the unedited cut... <p></p><i></i>

[smithtalk]

i saw it on another site which said about the video <br>"people filmed the whole thing"<br>i was very dissapointed to discover that it didnt show the second plane at all, didnt show the first collapse, and is awkwardly focusing wrongly when the second collapse occurs,<br>having said that there is some very good close up footage of the burning hole from the first plane and it gave me as a non new yorker the best overall sense of the buildings, the streets and the events as they unfolded that i have yet had<br> <p></p><i></i>

[FranklinCase Admin]

I haven't really been one to get to excited at the photos of the faces in the WTC smoke, but I saw this when watching the video, and found it more apparent than most of the other images, what do you guys think, am I seeing things, or wanting to see things?<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.911-news.com/images/headinwtc.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>