by Dreams End » Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:29 pm
The "Golden Candle" is the award given to pioneers of open source intelligence (OSINT). These are available on Steele's site:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Golden Candle Awards<br><br>The open source intelligence revolution is a "bottom up" revolution, and an international revolution. It turns out--no one could have predicted this--that it was also the first necessary step in bringing the seven tribes of intelligence (national, military, business, law enforcement, academia, NGO-media, and religious) "in from the cold" to talk openly with one another about the need for dramatic changes in sources, methods, and the culture of intelligence. From this, aided by the Internet technical revolution has emerged "the new craft of intelligence." Each of the individuals and organizations listed below is part of this total story, with many more yet to be recognized. They are the heros, and to them go the honors. The list is in chronological order, from the first awards given in 1992 to the most recent just awarded in this year.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.oss.net/extra/page/?action=page_show&id=151&module_instance=1">link</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>He sure gives out lots of them. It doesn't look as if any of these folks are connected to him (other than his wife....she gets a candle too), and may not even know he's awarded them this "honor." In any event, it's about the "deep web". Data mining and other techniques for using the open access web for intelligence. He doesn't mention the use of the web for disinformation....but these are the guys who would be doing that as well. In fact, if there is anyone out there who would be doing studies by putting out some little false but interesting conspiracy tidbit and tracking its spread across the web, this would be the guy. <br><br>In fact...I imagine he's reading this now. Hi Robert!<br><br>In a sample chapter of his book available on his site he outlines his plans. It's basically the TIA writ global. He wants a global open source intelligence organization that is associated with the UN. He has all the best motives, of course:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><br>Global Intelligence Burden-Sharing<br><br>As a further aid to Presidential decision-making, I believe the time has come to create a Global Intelligence Council (GIC) and a Global Intelligence Organization (GIO).<br><br>The Global Intelligence Council should be an international body responsive to the United Nations but not within its authority or budget, responsible for global intelligence policy and global decisions about burden-sharing with respect to open source collection, selected classified collection missions, and burden-sharing with respect to joint intelligence production activities of mutual interest.<br><br>The prevention of genocide and mass atrocities, the reduction of trade in women and children, and the elimination of toxic dumping in Africa are all examples of worthy global intelligence projects.<br>This body should be the focal point for orchestrating a matching $1 billion investment from all other nations into open source intelligence collection and production. The U.S. should commit to making the products from its own investments in open sources available to all those who providing matching funds, however modest, with the same expectation.<br><br>Under this approach, and with the active participation of each of the theater commanders-in-chief with regional responsibilities, we would immediately implement "Global Coverage" with daily, weekly, and "as required" reporting spanning the full range of countries and topics represented in the Foreign Intelligence Requirements and Capabilities Plan (FIRCAP). This information, drawing on the considerable capabilities of selected private sector organizations such as Dow Jones Interactive, the Economist Intelligence Unit, and others, would be accessible by all participating or authorized individuals through the "extranet" that provides for information-sharing at multiple levels of security with an infinite variety of "by name" working groups.<br><br>In addition, at some future date after trust and confidence has been gained in the Global Intelligence Council, there should be a Global Intelligence Organization. This should be an affiliated international body responsive to the GIC but never associated with the United Nations, responsible for overseeing, coordinating, and managing joint clandestine and technical endeavors that integrate—often in isolation from one another—covert capabilities made available by participating nations.<br><br>At its best, the GIO will create and manage three international Stations—one in Pretoria focused on Africa, one in Santiago focused on Latin America, and one in Canberra focused on Asia. U.S. satellites, indigenous case officers, and combined US-UK-AUS and indigenous analysis teams will focus on those specific issues that are indisputably of common interest: terrorism, counter-proliferation, crime & narcotics, and trade in women and children, to name just four issues of universal concern.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>From: ON INTELLIGENCE: Spies and Secrecy in an Open World—Chapter 13<br><br>I'm not completely sure what the dog drug in with this one..but I think it's important. <p></p><i></i>