by Hugh Manatee Wins » Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:33 am
Showing the WTC being demolished over and over programs civilians and everyone else, too. Much less loss of 'face' to the military than showing the Almighty Pentagon being hit.<br><br>More international sympathy is derived from WTC trauma than the much-mistrusted and hated Pentagon gettin' it.<br><br>And it also may be that a video of the hit on the Pentagon would show things we're not supposted to see, too.<br><br>I don't know what hit the Pentagon. I'm suspecting more than one thing hit the building. Perhaps a missile and a plane.<br><br>All the indications of a missile are there. Small initial punture hole in the wall and deep multi-wall penetration which a plane wouldn't cause.<br><br>Karen Kwiatkowski was one of the Pentagon whistleblowers against Douglas Feith's cherry-picking Special Plans Office whipping up a war and she was early on the scene at the Pentagon's 'wound.' She says no smell of jet fuel and no discernable jet parts.<br><br>Yet many witnesses say they saw a plane, too. <br>Maybe a missile just barely preceded a plane...of some kind.<br><br>Flight 77's two massive engines made of titanium mounted out on the wings did not punch through the Pentagon's walls as photos prove. Right? Just the initial 19-foot wide central hole before the collapse that made it much bigger.<br><br>When JFK was shot in the head there seems to have been practically simultaneous hits to his head that confused analysts for a long time. 'Simultaneous' may be what helps us sort out the Pentagon hit, too.<br><br>Seems to me that the NORAD wargames figure into enabling this scenario.<br><br>Could the missiles defending the Pentagon be somehow used to hit it for a plausibly deniable 'accident' which would then be conveniently hushed-up? Accidents get the same cover-up treatment that conspiracies do, too.<br><br>Plus we have to keep in mind that very sophisticated software hacking seems to be part of making those wargames 'go live,' atleast according to Webster Tarpley who makes a lot of sense here, I think. <br><br>Imagine a plane (of some kind) is spiraling down fast on the Pentagon and either an automatic surface-to-air missile or one fired by a defender (who has finally come out of 'excercise' mode)<br>accidentally hits the Pentagon at almost the same time as the plane. Or software shenanigans makes a defender hit that which he is defending. <br><br>An awful lot of possibilities here. And ultimately still no reason for the Pentagon to show it to us.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
