by Bismillah » Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:31 pm
<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.qlipoth.blogspot.com/" target="top">"The Creation and Maintenance of Public Myths" (Who is Philip Zelikow?)</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>He was. of course, co-author of a book with 'Condi' Rice. Five years later (despite the vehement protests of the bereaved families), he was appointed executive director of the 9-11 Commission.<br><br>But there's more to him than that. Another of his literary collaborators was a former CIA chief. Their joint composition, published in 1998, was just as remarkably prescient as the PNAC team's premonition of a New Pearl Harbor.<br><br>------------------------------------------------------------<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1352.shtml" target="top">"Stealing the midterm elections and the power of myth"<br><br>Mike Whitney, Online Journal, Oct 25, 2006</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>[...] In researching the Bush administration’s manipulation of public perceptions, I came across an interesting summary of the State Department’s Philip Zelikow, who was executive director of the 9-11 Commission, that greatest of all charades.<br><br>According to Wikipedia:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>“Prof. Zelikow’s area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, ‘public myths’ or ‘public presumptions’ which he defines as ‘beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known with certainty) and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community.’ In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called ‘searing’ or ‘molding’ events (that) take on 'transcendent’ importance and therefore retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene. . . . He has noted that ‘a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make the connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all.”</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br>(“Thinking about Political History”, Miller Center Report, Winter 1999, pp. 5-7)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>Isn’t that the same as saying there is neither history nor truth; that what is really important is the manipulation of epochal events so they serve the interests of society’s managers? Thus, it follows that if the government can create their own “galvanizing events,” then they can write history any way they choose.<br><br>If that’s the case, then perhaps the entire war on terror is cut from whole cloth; a garish public relations maneuver devoid of meaning.<br><br>Wikipedia helps to clarify this point by adding:<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>“In the Nov-Dec 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs he (Zelikow) co-authored with the former head of the CIA) an article entitled 'Catastrophic Terrorism' in which he speculated that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, ‘the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the<br>Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force.”</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br>(Philip Zelikow, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia)<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br>That was written in 1998!<br><br>Amazing. It is almost like Zelikow knew what was going to happen on 9-11 and was drawing attention to the “draconian measures” (scaling back civil liberties) which may seem attractive to ruling elites in the policy establishment.<br><br>Now, (coincidentally) everything has evolved almost exactly as Zelikow predicted. Just like Pearl Harbor, 9-11 has “divided our past and future into a before and after.” The post-9-11 world relates to a world in which personal liberty is no longer protected, and where surveillance, detention and the use of deadly force are all permitted. It is a world in which “America’s fundamental sense of security” has been shattered and will continue to be shattered as a way of managing public opinion.<br><br>As Zelikow presciently implies, the post 9-11 world depends entirely on “public myths”; fairy tales invented by society’s supervisors which perpetuate the illusion of democracy, freedom and the rule of law.<br><br>So, how does this apply to Karl Rove?<br><br>There are only two weapons in the imperial tool chest; force and deception. I expect that the anticipated Democratic landslide will be preempted by massive voter fraud accompanied by some type of “searing event”; that way the fantastical outcome of a GOP victory can be neatly folded into a larger and all-pervasive "myth."<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1352.shtml" target="top">As we have been reminded many times: Reality no longer matters; only the perception of reality. The power of myth reigns supreme.</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=bismillah@rigorousintuition>Bismillah</A> at: 10/31/06 5:41 pm<br></i>
