by havanagilla » Sat Apr 08, 2006 10:27 am
Oh, totally, asking questions all the time, and leave no stone unturned, I am for it, as you can see. My comments are along this line and all my comments are hunches, and could be worth nothing in reality.(as per the go between's motivations). I have a very wide perspective on this issue, first as victim (maybe connected to same perps), but also as someone who cynically was re-used by people who should know better, and I will elaborate on that. Since you mention that for me "it is in the past", well if 2 years ago makes it "past and behind me", then maybe.<br>--<br>My abuse beside being the usual sex pedo/sadism/exploitation was later mingled with some form of espionage, although most of it was domestic. One of my "professional fronts" was a lawyer, which I now see as totally part of the coaching and programming, namely, not something that was concurrent but part of the "script" including my education and everything else. This "mask" served several goals, main one was to pave the road to certain clients (high powered, some very high legal figures both here and in the US whom I catered as a "bribe gift"). The moment I became partly consicous of it, I quit the profession as part of my healing process (and I am not entirely recommending this to victims with similar profiles, because in a way the professional persona is also a pillar of the functioning parts, and removing it abruptly is risky). However, after having done that, and while I was seeking therputic help and refuge, the professional care takers were using my false-guilt (which was really part of the programming and desease) to concoct a political vendetta against <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Israel.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> Your story rang a bell, although I might be totally off here. That is, I might be projecting my mishap on other players whom I really don't know. <br>--<br>I cannot but strongly and unequivocally condemn any such revictimization of an MC victim, by political players who simply know how to pull the strings of victims, in the same way that the perps know. I see it as reprehensible, along the lines of how Maitre michelle abused the trust (by presenting herself as advocate of victims and turning against them, so I understand). So, we must all be careful not to spill the baby with the dirty waters. Only God knows what people would do had they not be electricuted and sadistically gang raped since they were toddlers, right ?<br>--<br>I have no idea whether the lady in question is a victim of MC, I tend to think she is not. People who have been MC'ed have a bizarre CV, and no "cosmetics" can utterly change it. I am just trying to figure out what's going on in this belgium case, since it might help me too, if this network is cracked open sometime.<br><br>What I do know though, that ANY case when victims were abused in the name of investigation, never led to the exposure of the real perps. So, I would recommend as a rule to go straight to the top, namely, smear Sharon and see what comes out, namely, if the security establishent of Israel, during the time<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong> he was minister of defense</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> were complicit with the belgium sex ring (for whatever reason) that's the gist of it, isn't it ? and if later the culprits in high places had some power games (maybe on sharing the loot), that's not so important. I see the Sabra/Shatila case more as having a spiritual, symbolic connection, namely, that warcriminals are usually pedophile creeps as well. And both Belgium (in the Congo) and Israel, wherever, have a record...this is called fascism and sexual sadism, as shown by pausolini and others, indlucing Jeff.<br><br>--<br>I just couldn't help remembering the righteous BS that the caretakers i happened to run into, were spouting to justify re troture of a victim, as if by this the ringleaders would be caught. Nothing of that sort happened of course, in my case included. Perps can very smartly assess the level of ethics and where they can strike dirty deals with advocates. What happens eventually, is something like the Sharon deal, namely, some money changes hands, none of it having to do with the welfare of victims or more justice. Its becomes a game of extortion and remains well in the dark and on the same level of morality. At least those advocates who screwed me, "for the just cause of getting back at "israel"", lost ALL their effectiveness and credibility in ANY other human rights cause. Leaning on the easiest target is a tactic reserved for power, not for justice. <br> <p></p><i></i>