Sexual Revolution started by pedophiles

by **Chris Cosmos** » Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:27 pm

Astonishing discussion! Huxley wrote a book called *The Pernnial Philosophy* which is a compendium of mystical writings from all the great religious traditions--most are mainstream and orthodox e.g., Francis DeSales (doctor of the Church). Aldous was very connected with the great tradition that is the only thing, in my view, that keeps this little planet sane. He was also a supported of J. Krishnamurti a prime example of spiritual heroism who shunned all religions as authoritarian and asked us to find out for ourselves what is going on through paying attention. I was involved in the "hippie" movement and had contact with well-known people and there were all kinds of people who were all manner of crazy and all manner of sane. People of all kinds associated together. Having said all this there is a germ of truth in the johnny nemo's post. There is and has been an element of self-centered, ego-based philosophy that has infected modernism in general. The over-valuation of sexuality, the promotion of compulsive behaviors and addictions, the promotion of psychedelics, the distorition of mystical techniques for personal gain and so on. But the connections that johnny nemo made are misleading at best.

by **johnny nemo** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:20 pm

Sorry for the delay in getting back to this subject, but I have been incredibly busy. Anyway....I was asked by Dreams End how I know the Illuminati's agenda. The agenda of the original Illuminati was to overthrow the governments of all countries, abolish its' religions and enstate a one-world government with a Universal religion of "peace". It has been further theorized that have hidden their aims in plain sight. I'll start with Thomas Paine's book "The Age of Reason" from 1795. The book is an attack on organized religion, especially Christianity, and calls for a Universal Deist religion. "It is certain that, in one point, all nations of the earth and all religions agree. All believe in a God, The things in which they disagree are the redundancies annexed to that belief; and therefore,if ever an universal religion should prevail, it will not be believing any thing new, but in getting rid of redundancies, and believing as man believed at first. Adam, if ever there was such a man, was created a Deist; but in the mean time, let every man follow, as he has a right to do, the religion and worship he prefers. In his essay, Origin of Freemasonry written in New York City in 1805, Paine developed the theory that Freemasonry was descended from the religion of the Druids. In 1818, it was published as a pamphlet with an anonymous preface stating: "This tract is a chapter belonging to the Third Part of The Age of Reason, as will be seen by the references made in it to preceding articles, as forming part of the same work." Next, we move on to Tennyson. In his poem, Morte d'Arthur, Alfred Lord Tennyson mentions a "new order" when King Arthur laments: "The old order changeth, yielding place to (the) new." There seems to be another possible meme hidden in his workThe Marriage Of Geraint, where two lines start out with the same phrase. The first is "White from the mason’s hand, a fortress rose;". The second, appearing much further down is "White from the mason's hand, I have sworn." Then in 1842 Alfred Lord Tennyson wrote a poem "Locksley Hall" which has an interesting part in it. For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see, Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be; Saw the heavens fill with commerce, argosies of magic sails, Pilots of the purple twilight, dropping down with costly bales; Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain'd a ghastly dew From the nations'airy navies grappling in the central blue; Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the battle-flags were furl'd In the Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe, And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law. **** (NOTE: Andrew Carnegie, in his book Triumphant Democracy, published in 1893, wrote: "The Parliament of Man and the Federation of the World have already been hailed by the poet, and these mean a step much farther in advance of the proposed reunion of Britain and America." 33rd Degree Freemason and member of the Order of Druids, Winston Churchill called Locksley Hall "the most wonderful of modern prophecies." 33rd Degree Freemason Harry Truman carried a copy of "Locksley Hall" in his wallet throughout his life.) **** What's astounding is that in 1842, In addition to a one-world government, Tennyson is predicting airplanes with "pilots" involved in firefights in the sky ! In 1888, Edward Bellamy wrote Looking Backward: 2000-1887, the story of a man who fell asleep after taking a sleeping potion and awoke in the year 2000 to find the world transformed into a socialist Utopia. Edward's cousin, Francis, was a Freemason and a Christian socialist and nationalist (uh-oh) who wrote the Pledge of Allegiance. Bellamy quotes Tennyson's "Locksley Hall" on page 103 of my copy. words that again and again, during these last wondrous days, had rung in my mind: - For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see. Saw the vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be; Till the war-drum throbbed no longer, and the battle-flags were furled, In the Parliament of man, the federation of the world. Bellamy, like Tennyson, also made some startling predictions. On page 98 of my copy, he wrote: the great nations of Europe, as well as Australia, Mexico and parts of South America, are now organized industrially like the United States, which was the pioneer of the evolution. The peaceful relations of these nations are assured by a loose form of federal union of world-wide extent. An international council regulates the mutual intercourse and commerce of the members of the union and their joint policy toward the more backwards races, which are gradually being educated up to civilized institutions. A prediction of the U.N. and the IMF in 1887 ! On page 71: "a credit card is given him...with which he procures...whatever he desires, whenever he desires it on page 100: An American credit card ...is just as good in Europe as American gold used to be, and on precisely the same condition, namely, that it be exchanged into the currency of the country you are traveling in. An American in Berlin takes his credit card to the local office of the international council . . . the amount being charged against the United States in favor of Germany on the international account. Credit cards in 1887 ! In the vein of these startling predictions, I must mention the H.G. Wells book "The World Set Free". (Wells, by the way, in addition to mentoring Huxley, and co-writing a book with Aldous's cousin, Julian, was taught biology by Huxley's grandfather T.H. Huxley.) On page 47 of my copy, Wells writes: "London, under the Visible Smoke Law, by which any production of visible smoke with or without excuse was punishable by a fine..." Fines for smoking in 1914 ! On page 104, he writes: "Manifestly, war has to stop...manifestly this can only be done by putting all the world under one government." And this leads us up to Huxley, his book Brave New World Revisited and a strange "American Stonehenge". It is hypothesized that a monument erected in 1980 by a mysterious gentleman named R.C. CHristian in Georgia, called the Georgia Guidestones, was created to illustrate the Illuminati plan for the world. It is dedicated to the aforementioned Thomas Paine's "Age Of Reason", as affirmed by the plaque which reads "Let these be the Guidestones to an Age of Reason". <a href="http://www.tylwythteg.com/guide.html">www.tylwythteg.com/guide.html</a> I will show the 10 Commandments of the Georgia Guidestones, with quotes from Huxley's book Brave New World Revisisted beneath them. 1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. "The coming time will not be the Space Age; it will be the Age of Over-population" (page 12) [NOTE: Their are many quotes, as the problem of overpopulation is a central theme throughout almost the entire book] 2. Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity. "Birth control depends on the co-operation of an entire people. It must be practiced by countless individuals.." (page 10) 3. Unite humanity with a living new language. "Find some common desire, some widespread unconscious fear or anxiety; think out some way to relate this wish or fear to the product you have to sell; then build a bridge of verbal or pictorial symbols over which your customer can pass from fact to compensatory dream, and from the dream to the illusion that your product, when purchased, will make the dream come true." (pages 59 & 60) 4. Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason. "All that is in our power is to be as truthful and rational as circumstances permit us to be..." (page 40) 5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts. "The democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms -elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest - will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial...Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit." (page 127) 6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court. "Meanwhile, the tachistoscopes... will be reinforcing what he says by systematically associating the man and his cause with positively charged words and hallowed images, and by strobonically injecting negatively charged words and odious symbols whenever he mentions the enemies of the State or the Party. In the United States brief flashes of Abraham Lincoln and the words "governemnt by the people" will be projected upon the rostrum. In Russia the speaker will, of course, be associated with glimpses of Lenin, with the words "people's democracy", with the prophetic beard of Father Marx. (page 97) 7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials. "Given a fair chance, human beings can govern themselves, and govern themselves better than they can be governend by "authorities independent of their will"" (page 37) 8. Balance personal rights with social duties. "The survival of democracy depends on the ability of large numbers of people to make realistic choices in the light of adequate information." (page 55) 9. Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite. "Therefore, if you wish to avoid the spiritual impoverishment of individuals and whole societies, leave the metropolis and revive the small country community" (page 137) 10.Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature. "We must insitute and implement a world-wide policy for conserving our soils and our forests.." (page 127) What I found most disturbing, was what he had to say on the last page of the book. "Under a scientific dictator education will really work-with the result that most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship  should ever be overthrown." Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=johnnynemo>johnny nemo</A> at: 6/28/06 12:28 pm

by **nashvillebrook** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:43 pm

big fucking deal. they weren't pedophiles and i wasn't abused. just because someone isn't 18 or 21 doesn't make them a "child" -- and no, i'm not dismissing real pedophilia -- the kind the GOP is so guilty of: <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=132&topic_id=2699778&mesg_id=2699778">www.democraticunderground...id=2699778</a> i think the interesting "break" here is between sex-postive and sex-negative RI-posters. so, my question to nemo is, why do you fear/hate sex so much? or,is this just a smear on hippies/yippies vis a vis Jeff's devastating Chant Down Babylon?

by **anotherdrew** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:12 pm

so - who here thinks sex should only happen between lawfully wedded men and women? Let's have them come right out and say so... this whole thread is crap. Nemo - I wish I had to time properly refute you, but I don't. Let's just say this whole damn hobby horse you're on is just more right-wing psy-war bullshit. one-world governemnt, what an empty boogie man, the criminal gang known as the republican party (of which I bet you're a member) rule by chaos, destruction darkness and fear, not by uniting the world in light. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=anotherdrew>anotherdrew</A> at: 6/28/06 1:16 pm

by **johnny nemo** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:26 pm

Those men were pedophiles, according to laws that reach back to the Victorian era. I don't hate or fear sex, I just consider it a tool that the PTB use as an opiate of the masses ala "No kid, don't be a revolutionary; be a lover, not a fighter." As to hippies....well, some of them , especially the Yippies, Motherf*ckers, Weathermen and White Panthers were trying to make a difference. Alot of them were just bored rich kids on vacation, into free drugs and free love and little else. Where I live, I see that everyday. People who complain about the problems with the system and then spend all their time doing bong hits and playing "frisbee golf". EDIT: Politically, I'm a man without a country. My personal views are very left-leaning, but I don't want a one world government, which the above writers are predicting. All of our presidents since Kennedy have been members of either the CFR, The Masons, The Bilderbergs or the Trilateral Commision. The real bullsh*t is people who don't study history, therefore don't know what they're talking about and then try to mock those of us who have. BTW, How can you not be blown away by people mentioning airplane wars and credit cards in the 1800s ?!? I find it astounding taht they all predict that and then also predict a one world government. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=johnnynemo>johnny nemo</A> at: 6/28/06 1:31 pm

by **4911** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:52 pm

dude how can you rip on people who dont study history but be surprised by an advocation of one world gov in the 1800s?

by **anotherdrew** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:06 pm

well fine then, I'll take back calling you a republican. Personally I don't have a problem with there being one government for the world, it would need to be a loose federation of states, with only limited direct power, and large peacekeeping forces that would not hesitate to stomp evil warlords into the ground (be they in africa or america). Set up properly it would be a wonderfull situation. The down side risks are all present with us now anyway. It could be good or bad, just like America. Think of it this way, better the one world government we can SEE, operating above board, than the present situation of a psudo-one-world government that lives in shadows and who's existence is denied by the 'mainstream'.

by **yathrib** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:35 pm

Peace, reason, wise use of resources... What psychopathic wackos! I missed the parts about underaged buggery... Could it be that you *made it up?* Nah!

by **johnny nemo** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:46 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>dude how can you rip on people who dont study history but be surprised by an advocation of one world gov in the 1800s?<hr></blockquote> Please read what I wrote again, dude. I was talking about Tennyson predicting airplanes and air battles in 1842, Bellamy predicting credit cards in 1887 and H.G. Wells predicting "no smoking" laws in 1914. I'm very familiar with the Utopian Socialist movement, dude. And to anotherdrew, There's no way in h*ll that I want the G8, CFR, TriLats and Bilderbergs running the world legitimately. The limited liberty we have now is infinitely preferable to outright totalitarianism. When I read Huxley's Brave New World Revisited, it sounded to me like a blueprint for how to create the perfect scientific dictatorship, with a minor theme in it being "Oh and by the way, I guess we should try and stop it from happening, no matter how bad my grandpa and his buddies want(ed) it to happen" mentioned in a manner so that it appears to be a call to revolution. <blockquote>Quote:<hr>Peace, reason, wise use of resources... What psychopathic wackos! I missed the parts about underaged buggery... Could it be that you *made it up?* Nah!<hr></blockquote> I cover the buggery earlier in the thread and provide ample evidence, some of it from Kinsey's own writings, for my claims. It helps if you read an entire thread before you post, BTW. I have to laugh every time someone posts "This is crap" and then can't refute a single point I make. The PTBs want a Soylent Green-esque Police State run by the Power Elite. If you really think that they're are gonna make it into a peaceful Global Socialist Utopia, then I've got some bridges that you might be interested in purchasing. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=johnnynemo>johnny nemo</A> at: 6/28/06 5:07 pm

by **Et in Arcadia ego** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 7:23 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>I don't hate or fear sex, I just consider it a tool that the PTB use as an opiate of the masses ala<hr></blockquote> You must have a really shitty sex life. Too much of your own gestalt is permeating your interpretations of what you research, man.. Seriously. What you're doing is shaping the data to conform to your own 'dark side' instead of having your own reckoning of it be shaped by the data.. That's not good, man. You help no one being that way, especially yourself. <img src="http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/sucks3.jpg" style="border:0;"/> And by the way, whatever the Illuminati is(that actually survived), it's not gonna be found in all this cottage industry propaganda crap you keep citing..

by **johnny nemo** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 7:59 pm

Yawn. Yet another detractor who can't refute the claims. This is getting boring. You really don't have any idea of the true history of America, do you? Here's a lil eye-opener for ya, son. One of the bigwigs in the Sexual Revolution was Margaret Sanger, the head of The American Birth Control League, which became Planned Parenthood. She was racist, a eugenicist and in 1932 wrote "Plan for Peace". In it,she called for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all "dysgenic stocks," including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics. <img src="http://members.aol.com/registered/private/freep/sanger.jpg"/> This pic is a fake, but in her 1938 autobiography, Margaret Sanger discusses her keynote address at a Silver Lake Ku Klux Klan Rally. She also followed mediums, the occult, was in the New Age group called the Unity, and was into theosophy. Margaret Sanger followed the teachings of Francis Galton. Galton was a Gnostic, who also believed that inferior races should be cease to reproduce, were considered enemies of the State or should exterminated in his "Aristole to Zoos" book on pg. 87. She instituted the Negro Project, which promoted African Americans to use birth control and have abortions as a way to stabilize the black population. Suprisingly one of the supporters of Sanger's was Freemason WEB DuBois one of the founders of the NAACP in 1909 ! Note that not a single black man headed the Rockefeller-funded NAACP until the 1970's when Prince Hall Freemason Benjamin Hooks came around. Black Nationalist Marcus Garvey criticized DuBois and called him an "Uncle Tom." Read the truth here. <a href="http://blackgenocide.org/sanger.html" target="top">blackgenocide.org/sanger.html</a> At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood. Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South." Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted. While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 192<img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif ALT="8)"> , and many others. These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive. Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as "gospel"; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America's family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justiices all accept as "social orthodoxy." Blaming Families Sanger's obsession with eugenics can be traced back to her own family. One of 11 children, she wrote in the autobiographical book, My Fight for Birth Control, that "I associated poverty, toil, unemployment, drunkenness, cruelty, quarreling, fighting, debts, jails with large families." Just as important was the impression in her childhood of an inferior family status, exacerbated by the iconoclastic, "free-thinking" views of her father, whose "anti-Catholic attitudes did not make for his popularity" in a predominantly Irish community. The fact that the wealthy families in her hometown of Corning, N.Y., had relatively few children, Sanger took as prima facie evidence of the impoverishing effect of larger families. The personal impact of this belief was heightened 1899, at the age of 48. Sanger was convinced that the "ordeals of motherhood" had caused the death of her mother. The lingering consumption (tuberculosis) that took her mother's life visited Sanger at the birth of her own first child on Nov. 18, 1905. The diagnosis forced her to seek refuge in the Adirondacks to strengthen her for the impending birth. Despite the precautions, the birth of baby Grant was "agonizing," the mere memory of which Sanger described as "mental torture" more than 25 years later. She once described the experience as a factor "to be reckoned with" in her zealous campaign for birth control. From the beginning, Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword: It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them. To Sanger, the ebbing away of moral and religious codes over sexual conduct was a natural consequence of the worthlessness of such codes in the individual's search for self-fulfillment. "Instead of laying down hard and fast rules of sexual conduct," Sanger wrote in her 1922 book Pivot of Civilization, "sex can be rendered effective and valuable only as it meets and satisfies the interests and demands of the pupil himself." Her attitude is appropriately described as libertinism, but sex knowledge was not the same as individual liberty, as her writings on procreation emphasized. The second edition of Sanger's life story, An Autobiography, appeared in 1938. There Sanger described her first cross-country lecture tour in 1916. Her standard speech asserted seven conditions of life that "mandated" the use of birth control: the third was "when parents, though normal, had subnormal children"; the fourth, "when husband and wife were adolescent"; the fifth, "when the earning capacity of the father was inadequate." No right existed to exercise sex knowledge to advance procreation. Sanger described the fact that "anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had the right to become a parent."  Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=johnnynemo>johnny nemo</A> at: 6/28/06 6:01 pm

by **Et in Arcadia ego** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:14 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>This pic is a fake, but...<hr></blockquote> <img src="http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/images/smiles/icon_sleep.gif" style="border:0;"/> Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=etinarcadiaego@rigorousintuition>et in Arcadia ego</A> at: 6/28/06 6:16 pm

by **jingofever** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:40 pm

So Tennyson described airships (not airplanes), Bellamy described credit cards and Wells described smoke laws. What is the point? Arthur Clarke described geostationary satellites in 1945, Karel Capek described robots in 1920, and Wells described time machines in 1895. A lot of authors speculate; sometimes their speculations become reality. What am I supposed to walk away with here? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=jingofever>jingofever</A> at: 6/28/06 6:46 pm

by **4911** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:50 pm

so um what pre-christian cults described pedophilia? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=4911>4911</A> at: 6/28/06 6:51 pm

by **streeb** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:11 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>What woman(girl) gets a recording contract these days without looking like Pamela Anderson? And, how old was Britney when she started her...um, act?<hr></blockquote> To me, Britney is the first land fish in terms of a western pop culture that was inching towards full blown pedotainment. It would make a hell of a book: the first half of her career was fueled almost entirely by speculation on her maidenhood and when she would lose it. I can't imagine a time before Britney when so much ink was wasted, so much breath lost and so much of the ether filled with the contemplation of a barely adolescent hymen. That WAS her "act". And now, she's a baby machine on the slide. She's become the last chapter of "Lolita". BTW - about Isherwood. The age difference in his relationships makes me queasy, but it doesn't really square with my understanding of 'pedophile'.

Sexual Revolution started by pedophiles

Re: Sexual Revolution started by pedophiles

This will blow your mind !

when i was 15 i had sex with adult men

Re: when i was 15 i had sex with adult men

Tell it to the judge

Re: Tell it to the judge

here come da judge, here come da judge

Didn't blow my mind...

Re: here come da judge, here come da judge

Re: here come da judge, here come da judge

Who is clueless now, son?

Re: Who is clueless now, son?

predictions

Re: predictions

Re: here come da judge, here come da judge

Who is online