Maxwell Poetry - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:20 am

Ultimately, in 1873, he would succeed in uniting a couple hundred years of electrical and magnetic scientific observations into a comprehensive, overarching electromagnetic theory of light vibrations ... carried across space by this "incompressible and highly stressed universal aetheric fluid ..." Maxwell's mathematical basis for his triumphant unification of these two great mystery forces of 19th Century physics were "quaternions" -- a term invented (adopted would be a more precise description) in the 1840s by mathematician Sir William Rowan Hamilton, for "an ordered pair of complex numbers" (quaternion = four). Complex numbers themselves, according to Hamilton's clarifications of long-mysterious terms such as "imaginary" and "real" numbers utilized in earlier definitions, were nothing more than "pairs of real numbers which are added or multiplied according to certain formal rules." In 1897, A.S. Hathaway formally extended Hamilton's ideas regarding quaternions as "sets of four real numbers" to the idea of four spatial dimensions, in a paper entitled "Quaternions as numbers of four-dimensional space," published in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society [4 (1887), 54-7]. It is obvious from Maxwell's own writings that, even before Hathaway's formalization, his choice of quaternions as mathematical operators for his electromagnetic theory was based on his belief that three-dimensional physical phenomena (including even perhaps the basis of human consciousness itself) are dependent upon higher dimensional realities. For, in honor of another great mathematician of the time, multi-dimensional geometer Arthur Cayley, Maxwell wrote ... "Oh WRETCHED race of men, to space confined! What honour can ye pay to him, whose mind To that which lies beyond hath penetrated? The symbols he hath formed shall sound his praise, And lead him on through unimagined ways To conquests new, in worlds not yet created. First, ye Determinants! In ordered row And massive column ranged, before him go, To form a phalanx for his safe protection. Ye powers of the nth roots of - 1! Around his head in ceaseless* cycles run, As unembodied spirits of direction. And you, ye undevelopable scrolls! Above the host wave your emblazoned rolls, Ruled for the record of his bright inventions. Ye cubic surfaces! By threes and nines Draw round his camp your seven-and-twenty lines- The seal of Solomon in three dimensions. March on, symbolic host! With step sublime, Up to the flaming bounds of Space and Time! There pause, until by Dickenson depicted, In two dimensions, we the form may trace Of him whose soul, too large for vulgar space, In n dimensions flourished unrestricted." -- James Clerk Maxwell To the Committee of the Cayley Portrait Fund -- 1887 Confirmation that Maxwell's "hyper-dimensional" inquiries extended far beyond "mere" physical interactions can be seen from another of his "unknown" poems ... "My soul is an entangled knot, Upon a liquid vortex wrought By Intellect in the Unseen residing. And thine doth like a convict sit, With marlinspike untwisting it, Only to find its knottiness abiding; Since all the tool for its untying In four-dimensional space are lying." In another work ("The Aether," 1876), Maxwell underscored the "ultimate" significance of these inquiries ... "Whether this vast homogeneous expanse of isotropic matter [the aether] is fitted not only to be a medium of physical Interaction between distant bodies, and to fulfill other physical functions of which, perhaps we have as yet no conception, but also as the authors of The Unseen Universe seem to suggest, to constitute the material organism of beings excercising functions of life and mind as high or higher than ours are at resent, is a question far transcending the limits of physical speculation ..." <a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/hyper1.html">www.enterprisemission.com/hyper1.html</a> rain, The hairs stood up on the back of my neck when I read what Chavez had said. Jerusalem is the obvious site for a future world government. It is recognised already by the UN as an "international city". As for who it is that will sit on the Throne of David, have you ever studied the coat-of-arms of the Prince of Wales? Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=antiaristo>antiaristo</A> at: 9/23/05 6:03 am

by **vondardenelle** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:45 am

antiaristo, just took a look at prince charles' coat of arms, why is there German text included? seriously. is this a gesture to the Hanovers?

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:04 am

vondardenelle, I believe it is. From the Act of Settlement Therefore for a further provision of the succession of the Crown in the Protestant line, we Your Majesty's most dutiful and loyal subjects, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, do beseech Your Majesty that it may be enacted and declared, and be it enacted and declared by the King's most excellent majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That the most excellent Princess Sophia, Electress and Duchess Dowager of Hanover, daughter of the most excellent Princess Elizabeth, late Queen of Bohemia, daughter of our late sovereign lord King James the First, of happy memory, be and is hereby declared to be the next in succession, in the Protestant line, to the imperial Crown and dignity of the said Realms of England, France, and Ireland, with the dominions and territories thereunto belonging, after His Majesty, and the Princess Anne of Denmark, and in default of issue of the said Princess Anne, and of His Majesty respectively: and that from and after the deceases of His said Majesty, our now sovereign lord, and of Her Royal Highness the Princess Anne of Denmark, and for default of issue of the said Princess Anne, and of His Majesty respectively, the Crown and regal government of the said Kingdoms of England, France, and Ireland, and of the dominions thereunto belonging, with the royal state and dignity of the said Realms, and all honours, styles, titles, regalities, prerogatives, powers, jurisdictions and authorities, to the same belonging and appertaining, shall be, remain, and continue to the said most excellent Princess Sophia, and the heirs of her body, being Protestants: and thereunto the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, shall and will in the name of all the people of this Realm, most humbly and faithfully submit themselves, their heirs and posterities: and do faithfully promise, that after the deceases of His Majesty, and Her Royal Highness, and the failure of the heirs of their respective bodies, to stand to, maintain, and defend the said Princess Sophia, and the heirs of her body, being Protestants, according to the limitation and succession of the Crown in this act specified and contained, to the utmost of their powers, with their lives and estates, against all persons whatsoever that shall attempt anything to the contrary. <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm11.showMessage?topicID=137.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=137.topic</a>

by **Qutb** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:12 am

So what did Chavez say then? I'm curious. I, the Black Prince, serve the Red Dragon. Qutb means "axis," "pole," "the center," which contains the periphery or is present in it. The qutb is a spiritual being, or function, which can reside in a human being or several human beings or a moment. It is the elusive mystery of how the divine gets delegated into the manifest world and obviously cannot be defined.

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:40 am

Qutb, Chavez was complaining about the way the US treats the UN. He said it was not right that the world body should be based in a country that shows it such contempt. He mused that it was time to relocate - maybe to Jerusalem. But he then went on to contradict himself saying the new location should be in the south, because that is where the majority of the world's developing countries are situated.

by **Pants Elk** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:24 pm

I always enjoy your writing here, but it always leaves me scratching my old noggin and grinning stupidly, with the feeling that I haven't quite understood? My own position is, I'd be the first to cheer at the sight of the heads of the "Royal Family" imapled on the railings of Buck House. The entire UK seems to be in some hypnotic sleep (very much like the sleep-spell of the wicked fairytale queen, in fact), feeling "affection" and "loyalty" for a bunch of inbred foreign freaks who leech off the people and give nothing in return except a stately wave from a gilded coach. Why the fuck are they still there, the bigeared, witless, blundering, evil-smelling retards? Why are they not only supported but *wanted* by a large section of the populace? This is basically the same question asked elsewhere in this fine if wayward forum; why does Dubya continue to get away with it? Questions, questions, questions ... and your eliptical writing gives some kind of answers, but (for me) doesn't quite deliver ... maybe it's my obtuseness? For a start - why and wherefore the Scottish Rite?

by **dbeach** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:32 pm

reptoid royalty and their american nazi coiusins named bush..and don't forget kerry is 9th cousin of bush and both are related to henry I of 11th century

by **dbeach** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 1:35 pm

<a href="http://www.cloakanddagger.de/">www.cloakanddagger.de/</a> scroll way down and see old photo of duke and dutchess of windsor smoozin with hitler [i f this photo is real}

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:31 pm

Pants, Nobody that asks an honest question is obtuse. It all goes back to the Poor Knights of Christ, based in France. What they discovered in Jerusalem gave rise to a new name – Knights of the Temple of Solomon. The Templars. When they were attacked (1307?) many were killed or captured, but many escaped. It is known that a sizeable contingent fled to Scotland and won sanctuary. The Bruce was in a fight with the Papacy at the time. There are legends of these knights arriving in the nick of time to turn the tide in one of Scotland’s periodic fights with England. Anyway, what they learned in Jerusalem was passed down the secret societies, until they came out in their new guise as Freemasons (not long after the Act of Union between England and Scotland in 1707). But they were first and foremost Scots, and they gained control of the Crown with Victoria (remember she holed up in Scotland with John Brown), specifically with the Treason Felony Act. Disraelli used that act to create all the flummery you see today. It does NOT go back into the mists of time, and is without doubt treasonous of the Act of Settlement. If you read the Treason Felony Act you will see that it is illegal to oppose the Queen. This is not true of a king, only a queen. This is as true today as it was at the time of Victoria. The reason the people cannot rid themselves of the Queen (or her placemen like Blair) is because she uses the law indirectly, and pre-emptively. If she wants to “get” someone she does not use the TFA directly; rather she uses the TFA on an agent of the State (could be anybody – a policeman, a judge, an accountant) and uses the apparatus of the State to “get” that person. And nobody can intervene (including the press), because it is illegal to do so. This is the raw power behind Freemasonry. In my own case she had Judge John Baker issue a forged Order out of the High Court under a false and fictitious name. I could go on and on, but I’ll check here to make sure I’m answering your question. More constitutional background here <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm11.showMessage?topicID=137.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...=137.topic</a>

by **chiggerbit** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:50 pm

May we know who you are, antiaristo? I know it's not pc to ask, but my curiosity gets the better of me

by **chiggerbit** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 3:55 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>you will see that it is illegal to oppose the Queen. This is not true of a king, only a queen<hr></blockquote> And is this why the q of e won't hand over to her son, for tactical reasons?

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:04 pm

chig, It certainly puts them in a difficult position. It is the reason Diana was murdered, and it is the reason they went through that illegal farce of a marriage between Charles and Camilla. But of course it is illegal for the press to say anything about this. Yes, of course. You can know more than you'll ever want look here <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=7.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...ID=7.topic</a> then here <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessage?topicID=6.topic">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...ID=6.topic</a>

by **proldic** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:00 pm

Yeah, whoa yeah Jah Rastafari structa we Highest of physiognomy Triangles upon my physiognomy Straight down from the pituitary The adrenal to the mouth Open down in the drought, whoa Selassie I jah rastafari structa we, yeah Structa I highly Yeah, order we deda don be Two heads upon two triangles upon the body, yeah Two creative members pon one hand each another in authority Which one of them beats in authority, oh woa Jah rastafari structa I highly, yeah To move in grace and majesty The giver of the utmost dignity The highly of the best of your quality, yeah Whoa, triangles interlaced Them a call it the Star of David, yeah Up in a Lalibela In the mountains of ithiopia Four directions, six diagonally, six spatially, yeah Highly and kingly Upon my idren all them bredren all them sistren Them aura is plain in visibility Them in a honesty Following the good ways of integrity, whoa, yeah Jah structa I highly To keep up his face and his majesty To withhold not of the good Withhold not of the good To rob not a man of his honor Of his stripes that he have earned Hard work, to the hard work in simplicity, hmm They stiff-necked Them chose to overlook him in a simplicity And overlook him unkindly, yeah Jah Rastafari structa man highly Walk in the utmost humility In the utmost dignity Structa the woman highly Made her the first, the empress be First mother, first teacher Give suckle, give nurture, give nature She is nature, ahh Them a sell the method to nature Them a sell method of Medusela, selah Rasta structa man highly To live up with the utmost ability Whoa, ahh, yeah

by **antiaristo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:06 pm

prol, That's a bit of a thread killer. Care to elaborate? I've heard Rastafarianism is VERY INTERESTING.

by **Pants Elk** » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:28 am

Anti, your reply certainly cleared up one thing I'd missed, that the Treason Felony act only applies to a queen, and not a king. I'm sure this nugget was in your previous posts, but you brought it out here. So that's why Her Madge was against her drooling, serial-bugger son acceding to the throne? Okay. What happens in the future, re succession? Although dear old Lilabet will live very nearly forever - who's next, and whither (grammar) the TFA? And while we're at it, how does she manage to twist Dubya's scrotum - where's the leverage?

Maxwell Poetry - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

Maxwell Poetry - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

coat of arms

Re: coat of arms

Re: Maxwell Poety - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

Re: Maxwell Poety - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

Dear Antiaristo ...

Re: Dear Antiaristo ...

Re: Dear Antiaristo ...

Freemasonry

Re: Freemasonry

Re: Freemasonry

Re: Freemasonry

Seal of Solomon In 6 Dimensions

Re: Maxwell Poety - Seal of Solomon in Three Dimensions

Her Madge ...

Who is online