Steven Spielberg, Jennifer Love Hewitt and Diana Napolis

by **rothbardian** » Mon May 08, 2006 4:27 am

Many of you may have a vague recollection of a 'stalker' who was accused of harassing both Steven Spielberg AND Jennifer Love Hewitt. A certain Diana Napolis AKA Karen Curio Jones was charged and convicted. The impression one would have gotten from the media is that she was mentally deranged. Interestingly though, if you read through her writings (spread far and wide across the Internet) right up to the time before her arrest, she comes across as very intelligent and coherent. She was on a mission to expose pedophilia in the Child Protective Services in San Diego (and all over the country, for that matter). She come under intense harassment and stalking. She also was treated to some vicious hatchet journalism at the hands of a certain Mark Sauer (from the San Diego paper). By the way, Svali (an occult survivor, who is also from San Diego) has indicated that a journalist with the initials M.S. who works for this San Diego paper is an MPD/DID Luciferian and a member of this bizarre cultic crime syndicate of which she was also a part. Even I had thought Napolis had been driven over the edge somehow, after reading about this Spielberg/Hewitt story. A number of Internet researchers indicated that she was under electronic harassment. Had this driven her to insanity? Well, apparently it was (is?) hell-on-earth for her, but in the following 'aftermath' report (in her own words), there seems to have been far more coherent purpose in her actions of confronting Spielberg and Hewitt. At the very least this is an interesting story, and I am inclined to believe that Diana Napolis is an extremely courageous and heroic individual who put herself in the line of fire, to try and rescue abused children. Here is her side of the story about Spielberg/Hewitt: (<a href="http://www.santabanta.com/newsmaker.asp?select=565)">www.santabanta.com/newsma...elect=565)</a> In the shocking revelation to SantaBanta, Ms Diana Napolis divulged some inner secrets of her side of story. She accused Steven Speilberg and Jennifer Love Hewitt of working in cahoots with the satanic cults, who take control over the mind. Here are some excerpts from her letter to SantaBanta. Diana Napolis Speilberg v. Napolis Petition for Injunction Prohibiting Harassment My name is Diana Napolis and I have a Master degree in Transpersonal Psychology and worked as a Court Investigative Social Worker for the County of San Diego from the years 1990-96. I then worked as a visitation supervisor for Family Court from the years 1995-2000 with one year overlapping due to oonlighting during the last year of work at Child Protective Services [CPS]. In the year 2000 I obtained my Marriage and Family Therapy License [MFT]. As background as to why I believe I am being harassed, I was following the controversy surrounding the subject of ritual abuse for 10 years within CPS and in the academic community in general and had handled several cases involving cults. There was an attempt to cover-up Cult/ritual abuse within the County of San Diego by a Grand Jury in the early 1990's, led by a woman by the name of Carol Hopkins who insisted this type of abuse did not occur. Due to this, during my tenure at CPS and afterwards, I concentrated on gathering evidence and cases from around the world which proved the existence of ritual abuse. I then became interested in tracking the various harassment techniques used by cults and the False Memory Syndrome Foundation against their political opponents. The targets are usually therapists, investigators and victims who are speaking out. The silencing techniques known at that time included harassing lawsuits, threats, censorship and rarely unusual assaults classified under the heading of "non-lethal" weaponry or psychotronics which has been written about in various military journals. One of the individuals and cult groups I was following during the years 1996-2000 was led by a Lt. Col. Michael Aquino [ret.], head of a satanic organization called the Temple of Set. The other people involved in Michael Aquino's particular network are a John M. Price, Ph.D. from UC Davis, Leslie E. Packer, and R. Christopher Barden, a lawyer from the False Memory Syndrome. Other people involved are satanist Scott Locklin, a physicist/computer student at UC Davis who also reportedly worked at Lawrence Livermore Lab in Southern California, Lorne D. Gilsig (colleague of Lt. Aquino's and ex-LAPD who blamed me for being fired from his job threeyears ago), Kevin Filan from the Church of Satan, Ron Locklin, computer expert from Lawrence Livermore Lab, David Pierce, David Hall, Zeena Lavey, Robert Menschel from the Temple of Set, and a woman by the name of Michelle Devereaux who had stalked me in San Diego, as documented in a San Diego Union-Tribune article datedSeptember 24, 2000, which exposed my identity. Later, it came to my attention that a few members of the group in question approached several people from Hollywood for funding after they were fired from their jobs. I was led to believe that Steven Speilberg was involved monitoring the situation, perhaps initially due to curiosity because some of the clandestine technology used also appears in his films under the guise of fiction. I also came to believe that Ms. Jennifer Love Hewitt, a singer and actress in Hollywood [identified in Kevin Borman's declaration as an anonymous celebrity,] or someone mimicking her, was involved and she had sexual relations with several of the perpetrators targeting me. Hewitt also asked one of the perpetrators {Michael Aquino -just identified} to use the technolology on others, as threat, in order to further her career. She was also told that if she took part in harming me she would be rewarded in some manner. On September 18, 2002 I verbally confronted Ms. Hewitt at the Latin Grammy awards after passing out written material to several reporters. The next day after the Latin Grammy Awards, I met with Mr. Kevin Borman, told him exactly what I was doing and where I was going and gave him a copy of the written material I was handing out. I then attended the premier of the movie, the Tuxedo. I gave a copy of the written material to a police officer in attendance which included allegations accusing both Steven Speilberg and Jennifer Hewitt of criminal conduct. [There are others involved but it makes the matter too compex the more people who are named]. At the end of this handout I included my name and phone number. Interestingly, Ms. Hewitt herself has not to date made any attempts to file a restraining order against me, which is unusual, at best, nor has she responded in any appropriate way as one might expect when one is being publicly accused of criminal activity. As a correction to the allegations put forth by Kevin Borman I am not accusing Mr. speilberg or his wife of remotely manipulating my body [via cybertronics technology] but of purchasing the technology which allows him to monitor and physically harm me. My impression was that he was being blackmailed or otherwise got himself involved too deeply with a group of people and a satanic cult which he could not extricate himself from; however, I am led to believe that he also wanted to come foward in some way about these issues. Due to the above I request that any restraining orders implemented be mutual. I declare under penalty of perjury and the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true correct. Executed this 10th day of October, 2002 at San Diego, California.

by **sunny** » Mon May 08, 2006 8:48 am

Wow, that is truly fascinating. FWIW, Love-Hewitt now has a highly publicized CBS show, called "Ghost Whisperer" which is I think a knock-off of "Medium." Funny how she got the gig after a couple of years of languishing in obscurity.

by **FourthBase** » Mon May 08, 2006 11:40 am

Don't want to bog down this thread with a Scientology angle... But Spielberg's sister is a Scientologist, his wife was one. He's been working with Tom Cruise a lot in recent years... And as we've read (e.g., LRH Jr.'s interview, LRH's Crowley hijinks), there seems to be a link between Scientology and black magic rituals.

by **rothbardian** » Mon May 08, 2006 12:45 pm

FourthBase-- You're not bogging anything down by me. Any info like that is interesting. I've always been interested in how Spielberg has had fairly deep insights into certain topics (Nazi occult, ETs, AI etc.). Somebody on another thread (DreamsEnd) was asking if anybody info on this and I had found this letter which Napolis had written. It looks like it doubled as a legal doc.

by **professorpan** » Mon May 08, 2006 2:34 pm

I remember looking into this and coming to the conclusion that the woman is mentally disturbed. I still think that's the most likely explanation.

by **Dreams End** » Mon May 08, 2006 3:32 pm

Here's what's sad. I know for a fact that the military and others have pursued microwave based and other forms of electronic mindfucking machines (for lack of a better term). From broadcasting "voices in the head" to simply causing dis-ease or even physical pain. This is not in dispute as you even see mainstream stories about such technology being used for "non-lethal" intervention, crowd control, etc. And I'm pretty sure even the broadcasting of microwave based "voice" messages is openly discussed as potential technology at the very least. I also think of our good friend Puharich, main hypnotizer of anyone who cared to channel "The Nine" whose sideline was finding novel ways to get sound to be heard via unusual mechanisms (connecting to nerves in the tongue, for example, via implants). Purely to help the deaf, you understand. In other words, despite my botched summary here, this technology, or at least its pursuit, is being pursued rather openly, so it is simply no leap of faith at all to assume that what's actually in use is pretty sophisticated. Juxtapose that with the fact that the results of such technology look just like paranoid schizophrenia. This is the sad part. To an outsider it would look the same. So I guess I would hope that someone under such attacks could step back and understand this and realize that her affidavit sounds like paranoid schizophrenic fantasies. Unless she's got video of someone "beaming her" or an affidavit from the Microwave operator, there's no chance it will be taken seriously, even by a sympathetic judge. Ditto on the flyers she handed out. Let's stipulate that all her information is 100% true. It still sounds like she's a raving lunatic. You just don't go around stalking celebrities like that. I'm not saying that if these stories are true you don't fight. But grab some mainstream friends and find out if they think you are nuts. If they do, then surely a judge will as well. It's this failure to recognize the probable reaction to these approaches, not just the stories themselves, that makes me question her mental stability. This is cheap talk from me, of course, because I've not been the victim of something like that. But I'd like to think that I'd recognize that a lawsuit claiming Spielberg was invading my brain would not be taken seriously. It would suck but I'd have to find some other way to go in my fight. I don't mean to criticize her. She was the first I know of to start trying to compile cases of SRA...and I think you can still find her archives on the net. Anyone know whatever happened to her? Is she in an institution?

by **havanagilla** » Mon May 08, 2006 4:49 pm

Her affidavit is heartbreaking, because she is semi aware of her situation. namely, aware of being microwaved, but does not realize that this is precisely what the results are - getting her to self sabotage, just enough to ruin reputation FOR EVER. Sounds a bit familiar. --- San Diego just doesn't smell good, with all those navy bases around it, and just the 'right' distance from LA to be a backyard for all the poisons. -- I just translated an article for a local human rights newsletter reviewing the latest uncontested 'none lethal' technology, re "making one hear voices". It was published here two weeks ago. The missing link, legally, would be to make a brief explaining the implications of said technology and how it would appear to a lay person. This has to be done by someone with official education though, preferably forensic psychiatrist or something. -- My paper from 2000 titled "the legal system and paranoid schizophrenics" is dealing with this problem, namely, the way the legal system treats the actual utterances of people who are diagnosed as such. I took 7 cases, and analyzed their utterances/narrative in an alternative way. I didn't dare suggest MC etc., but I tried to show that this could be valid social critique of denied realities. Plus, that the legal system is not in the business of determining what is real or fantasy, rather it has to limit itself strictly to the question of danger (namely, does the person endanger self or other). And that these utterances should be excluded from evidence as inflaming or immaterial to the pending case. -- Recently, a person approached me with a situation which raises same dilema. Clearly a functional person (family man, working, educated etc.) who filed a petition to the high court of justice to order the IDF to expose a "chanelled message" he was exposed to 20 years ago. From talking to him, I realized that the pitfall in his situation, which might very well be true, is that he insists on ignoring reality in terms of how the legal system treats these kinds of allegations. I don't think this is madness, not at all, i just think that the pain, and the sense of urgency in preventing a disaster (whether a satanic cult hurting children, or a military accident channeled from god, or personal persecution) takes over sound judgment. Plus, once people are exposed to horrible realities, they have a psychological need to believe that the rest of the world is just waiting and hoping to deal with it, whereas, in most cases, even if you have sound proof, the courts or police are very reluctant to crack down on major crime rings, for obvious, not so noble, reasons. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=havanagilla>havanagilla</A> at: 5/8/06 2:51 pm

by **mother** » Mon May 08, 2006 5:15 pm

There are lots of very bad things happening with various (not all) Child Protective Services people. Many people quit because it's just too sickening to work in some of these agencies. In some cases, it is safe to say that only sociopaths need apply. And certainly Diana Napolis is going to come off as a teeny bit unbalanced. Trying to fight these people will harm the strongest psyche, for one thing. And going up against the Speilburg empire unless you're a billionaire carries its own special risks. Hava, San Diego is a very special place, Navy and more. The story of Diane Napolis is worthy of great attention, although I am sure she'll get put in her place. Many are unaware of how much legal authority CPS have, how much bending the law and so forth they are typically allowed.

by **rothbardian** » Mon May 08, 2006 5:30 pm

I agree with you, Mother. There should be an increased focus on Napolis and the whole San Diego scene. Mr. Pan-- I'm not sure if it was intentional on your part (or if you simply are bouncing around this conversation board making quick comments) but you make a rather odd 'non-contribution' here. It's a bit difficult to interact very well with 'breezy dismissals'. I'm not quite sure how to respond to such. Anyway, I was still wondering about your response to my comments at the other thread. <a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessageRange?topicID=4086.topic&start=41&stop=50">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...41&stop=50</a> You had brought up the subjects of Titan vs. the Titanic...and the rapper CD cover depicting the WTC attack. DreamsEnd-- I may be on a slightly different page than you here. Sorting through the issue of whether she 'appeared' insane to mainstream people...and/or expecting her to have had a sensible communication strategy in midst of her 'electronic harassment' travails...is kind of a write-off for me. In her tortured condition, did she make some moves that were less than effective? I suppose it's possible. And then again, to have approached Hewitt one time, and be convicted of 'stalking'...that is also a little weird. In any case, NONE of the stuff that gets discussed here at RI, even in the most carefully couched terms, appears to be anything but madness to most "outsiders" anyway. I just was interested in any light she might have been shedding in her article (at SantaBanta.com). As I said, her writing there seems coherent --and given what many posters at RI know about the connection between the 'power elite' and pedophilia/occultism...her complaints about Spielberg and Hewitt were intriguing to me. The corroboration from Svali was also very interesting. Already, FourthBase has popped up with the info that Spielberg's family is connected to (the overtly occultic) Scientology. That's what I like about this board-- the puzzle pieces continue to accumulate.

by **NewKid** » Mon May 08, 2006 6:41 pm

DE is exactly right. The technology is certainly real, but look at how this stuff plays in the media. It's facially preposterous. Nobody in the legal system will take this seriously in a million years. It's an "eyeball roller." <a href="http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,12595,00.html" target="top">www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,12595,00.html</a> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2003-10-01#celeb4" target="top">www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2003-10-01#celeb4</a> I don't really know this story very well; was this the same woman who was having online fights with Aquino?

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Mon May 08, 2006 7:54 pm

"Anyone know whatever happened to her? Is she in an institution?" I've tried piecing her story together several times, and it always leaves me very sad. The most recent update I've read is that she's free and living with her mother, and has agreed to observe several conditions of release. I can't recall specifics, but I think one was limited access to the Internet.

by **biaothanatoi** » Mon May 08, 2006 8:22 pm

I read recently that she'd been released. Of course it's all speculation, this reads like a nervous breakdown to me. Her writing was always quite lucid, but her "Masters in Transpersonal Psychology" is ridiculous and she was fairly obsessive in her attacks on Aquino. There is evidence of instability before the harrasment of Spieldberg and Hewitt. And her story just doesn't flow once she starts talking about Hollywood. Spieldberg is "monitoring" her, Hewitt wants to "harm" her - she may well have recieved this kind of information (and you hear all sorts of wierd crap in RA) where is the reality-checking? And why did she act on it in the way that she did?

by **slimmouse** » Mon May 08, 2006 8:25 pm

But it wasn't because I didn't know enough I just knew too much Does that make me crazy Does that make me crazy Does that make me crazy Probably

by **rothbardian** » Mon May 08, 2006 9:41 pm

biao-- You said "...her "Masters in Transpersonal Psychology" is ridiculous...". I was wondering what you meant. I googled for this 'Trans Psych' and it appears to be a routine subject. Also you stated "she was fairly obsessive in her attacks on Aquino". I'd be interested in any links or quotes you may have off hand. I am wondering how it would be humanly possible to be too obsessive in opposing the likes of Aquino. (Unless you simply meant that in opposing him, Napolis became so intense as to indicate signs of 'cracking'.)

by **steve vegas** » Mon May 08, 2006 9:50 pm

I've heard rumors since at least 1991 that Spielberg is a pedophile, also John Travolta. I'm inclined to give more credence to this lady than I am to her detractors even if she is kookoobananas. Think of what we're talking about here, how fucking sick and crazy do you have to be to belong to something called "The Temple of Set", or to do the things to children that we speculate about here. Why wouldn't the only person brave or insightful enough to gather evidence on and attempt to expose these freaks be just like this woman?