rigorousintuition.ca

I met with Richard again today as he has not had as much phone time available. He answered all of my questions with no hesitation and wanted me to pass on his thanks and appreciation to everyone at Rigorour Intuition for discussing his trial with an open viewpoint. I want to personally assert again that if anyone is looking for the "crazy" man in all this--you are not going to find it in Richard. He was lucid, clear, and rational.<br><br>Brad<br><br>p.s. Hello, Noel, still lurking? <p></p><i></i>

I fervently hope we can do something to help your brother and his family. <p></p><i></i>

Glad to hear it. I wonder if you might keep your posts in one thread? I don't mean this in any way to diminish these posts, but these smaller ones will sink and not be part of the main conversation. Up to you though.<br><br>I don't think we are contributing much, here. I'm wondering if those more familiar with some of these California cases are checking them closely again to look for parallels, similar times and places, etc. I haven't had time. <br><br> <p></p><i></i>

All right. I can stick to the longer thread. I thought that might get too long for people and get sort of lost in itself. My main object here is to simple provide an extra source of information due to the media bias. There is no doubt that the Moutain Democrat has made mistakes--or outright lied. I'll go back to the other longer thread ... if people want to ask questions. <p></p><i></i>