by Bradley Mason Hamlin » Thu Nov 10, 2005 7:28 pm
I think there is a middle ground where Susan and Richard could both be in part telling the truth and in part lying. I think that's where the real answers lie, but of course, that will be the hardest to determine as long as both of them stick to their own versions.<br><br>I know he sounds crazy. It's sort of strange, because it seems much of the prosecution's argument is geared toward proving that Richard is insane--not that Richard cleverly, or not so cleverly, organized a complex extortion plan. If he's really nuts, he needs psychiatric help. He's not going to get that in Folsom Prison.<br><br>If Richard is insane, it is of a most complex nature. If he's insane he is an undiagnosed sociopath. There just isn't any other flavor of crazy you can attach to him. He's not schizoid, although, they have tried to allude to that with the mention of "codes." According to Richard he was never looking for codes. He was investigating Susan's background. That much I believe, obsessing on her background and Sid's--but not seeing codes that aren't there.<br><br>Supposedly a minister and his wife came to see Richard and told him Susan had talked to them a few years back, but yes, most of what I'm saying came directly from Richard and of course my own speculation. The main reason I'm willing to discuss all this is because I'm irked at how irresponsible the media has handled all of this.<br><br>An important thing to look at in this case is not just "if" Susan wrote her true confessions--it is "what" she wrote in those confessions. They do not read as false statements.<br><br>Yes, the kids were crossed by Bob Banning, but since the newspapers aren't reporting the defense's side, we really don't know much of what occured in the cross. <p></p><i></i>