Enter Syria?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Enter Syria?

Postby nomo » Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:17 pm

<!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=135760">www.turkishpress.com/news.asp?id=135760</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Syria president puts army on alert</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Published: 7/31/2006<br>        <br>DAMASCUS - Syrian President Bashar al-Assad ordered the armed forces "to step up their state of readiness" Monday in the face of Israel's continuing offensive against his country's western neighbour, the official SANA news agency said.<br><br>The president ordered troops to "intensify their training efforts, be prepared and increase their state of readiness in the light of the international situation and the challenges in the region," SANA said.<br><br>Assad issued the new orders as the Syrian military prepared to commemorate Army Day Tuesday.<br><br>07/31/2006 19:54 GMT<br><br><br><!--EZCODE HR START--><hr /><!--EZCODE HR END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.antiwar.com/news/?articleid=9444">www.antiwar.com/news/?articleid=9444</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Is the US Encouraging Israel to Attack Syria?<br></strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>Despite Israel's repeated insistence that it does not want an armed conflict with Syria, could the United States be encouraging the Israelis to attack Syria, or to goad the Syrians into attacking Israel first?<br><br>According to Sunday's Jerusalem Post, IDF officials have been "receiving indications from the United States that the U.S. would be interested in seeing Israel attack Syria."<br><br>It is no secret that relations between the U.S. and Syria are extremely strained. Syria's Ambassador to the United States, Imad Moustapha, claims he has not met with Bush officials in a year and a half and that, despite blaming Syria for much of it, the administration isn't willing to talk to him about the Israeli-Lebanese crisis.<br><br>Long before the current conflict, the United States described Syria as a "rogue nation" and part of the "axis of evil." As far back as three years ago, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan thought that U.S.-Syria tensions might destabilize the Middle East.<br><br>For its part, Israel allegedly has abandoned its plans to invade southern Lebanon up to the Litani River; nevertheless, Israel has called up 30,000 reservists for training. Israel also bombed positions in Lebanon that are extremely close to the Syrian border – including the Lebanese-Syrian highway, which many refugees have used to escape fighting.<br><br>If it is indeed Israel's plan to widen the scope of the conflict so that Syria must enter the picture, this could explain Israel's overreaction to the capture of its two soldiers on July 12. It could also explain why the U.S. continues to support Israel in the face of almost universal condemnation for its attacks on Lebanese civilians.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter Syria?

Postby jingofever » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:10 pm

From 'A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm', that prescient neo-con strategy paper.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Securing the Northern Border<br><br>Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran, as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by:<br><br> * striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan.<br><br> * paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces.<br><br> * striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper. <br><br>Israel also can take this opportunity to remind the world of the nature of the Syrian regime. Syria repeatedly breaks its word. It violated numerous agreements with the Turks, and has betrayed the United States by continuing to occupy Lebanon in violation of the Taef agreement in 1989. Instead, Syria staged a sham election, installed a quisling regime, and forced Lebanon to sign a "Brotherhood Agreement" in 1991, that terminated Lebanese sovereignty. And Syria has begun colonizing Lebanon with hundreds of thousands of Syrians, while killing tens of thousands of its own citizens at a time, as it did in only three days in 1983 in Hama.<br><br>Under Syrian tutelage, the Lebanese drug trade, for which local Syrian military officers receive protection payments, flourishes. Syria’s regime supports the terrorist groups operationally and financially in Lebanon and on its soil. Indeed, the Syrian-controlled Bekaa Valley in Lebanon has become for terror what the Silicon Valley has become for computers. The Bekaa Valley has become one of the main distribution sources, if not production points, of the "supernote" — counterfeit US currency so well done that it is impossible to detect.<br><br>Text:<br><br> Negotiations with repressive regimes like Syria’s require cautious realism. One cannot sensibly assume the other side’s good faith. It is dangerous for Israel to deal naively with a regime murderous of its own people, openly aggressive toward its neighbors, criminally involved with international drug traffickers and counterfeiters, and supportive of the most deadly terrorist organizations.<br><br>Given the nature of the regime in Damascus, it is both natural and moral that Israel abandon the slogan "comprehensive peace" and move to contain Syria, drawing attention to its weapons of mass destruction program, and rejecting "land for peace" deals on the Golan Heights.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm">www.iasps.org/strat1.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter Syria?

Postby Et in Arcadia ego » Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:16 pm

<!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.sickle666.com/images/goth/war2.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p>____________________<br>Some are born to sweet delight, some are born to endless night.</p><i></i>
User avatar
Et in Arcadia ego
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Location: The Void
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter Syria?

Postby 4911 » Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:39 pm

very well then, bretheren; let us bend over and kiss our asses goodbye. (each his own of course.) The shithouse goeth yea up in flames.<br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
4911
 
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 9:34 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter Syria?

Postby dugoboy » Mon Jul 31, 2006 11:24 pm

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/07/is-syria-next-either-by-accident-or-on.html" target="top"><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">Is Syria next -- either by accident or on purpose?</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--> </a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p>___________________________________________<br>"BUSHCO aren't incompetent...they are COMPLICIT." -Me<br><br>"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act" -George Orwell</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=dugoboy@rigorousintuition>dugoboy</A> at: 7/31/06 9:25 pm<br></i>
dugoboy
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Enter Syria?

Postby zed53 » Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:22 am

According to Sunday's Jerusalem Post, IDF officials have been "receiving indications from the United States that the U.S. would be interested in seeing Israel attack Syria."<br><br>déjà vu<br><br>"On October 1st<br><br><br>Teddy [Kollek] brought in a classified cable from Washington. Our "partner" named [in code] "Ben" [Kermit Roosevelt of the CIA] ... describes the terrible confusion prevailing in the State Department under the shock of the Nasser- Czech "i.e., Russian" deal. (Henry) Byroade and all the others who were in favor of U. S. support to Egypt lost their say completely. He adds: "We are surprised at your silence." When our man asked for the meaning of these words, and whether we are expected to go to war, the answer was: "if, when the Soviet arms arrive, you will hit Egypt no one will protest." (I October 1955, 1182)<br><br>In the cabinet meeting on October 3 at one stage Ben Gurion declared:<br><br><br>"if they really get Migs ... I will support their bombing! We can do it!" I understood that he read the cable from Washington. The wild seed has fallen on fertile ground. (3 October 1955) <br><br>Isser [Harel, Shin Bet chief] likewise concludes that the U.S. is hinting to us that as far as they are concerned, we have a free hand and God bless us if we act audaciously.... <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Now ... the U.S. is interested in toppling Nasser's regime</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->, . . . but it does not dare at the moment to use the methods it adopted to topple the leftist government of Jacobo Arbeni in Guatemala [19541 and of Mossadegh in Iran [1953].... It prefers its work to be done by Israel." <br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.chss.montclair.edu/english/furr/essays/rokach.html" target="top">Israel's Sacred Terrorism [/link<br><br><br></a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
zed53
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:22 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Enter Syria?

Postby Byrne » Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:32 am

Interesting observation over at <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://shaphan.typepad.com/" target="top">Shaphan Blog</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Birth pangs of a new ME</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Condi Rice's phrase, <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>'birth pangs'</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--></em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, was a subtle reference to Matthew 24, which may well be the most apocalyptic chapter in all the New Testament, save for the Apocalypse itself. The New Jerusalem Bible (the best version) translates verses six to eight thus: <br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>6 You will hear of wars and rumours of wars; see that you are not alarmed, for this is something that must happen, but the end will not be yet. 7 For nation will fight against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All this is only the beginning of the <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>birthpangs</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Other bibles translate the phrase as: 'birth pains' (NIV); 'sorrows' (KJV); 'throes' (Darby); and 'birth pangs' (NASB) [via Bible Gateway]. <br><br><br><br>Was Rice alluding to something she knows that is going to happen?...... <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Byrne
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Middle East

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests