by robertdreed » Thu Oct 13, 2005 3:57 pm
There's only so much one can learn from someone else's trip diary.<br><br>I'm wary of people jumping on board the psychedelic bandwagon as a way to gain cred as superior enlightened beings- especially with exotic brews like ayahuasca, which is such a cathartic ordeal experience that most people are content to read reports about it from the comfort of their armchairs. It doesn't help that it's an easy experience to crib from someone else's account. The archetypal motifs of the experience seem to have a commonality for anyone who ingests it, as the content is apparently more about core visionary perception than lucid thought and contemplation. Super-powerful psychedelics are like that. No fooling around with programming languages, they head straight for the assembly code...<br><br>But the overwhelming character of such experiences makes it easy to fake having had them, unlike the case with substances like LSD, where it's comparatively easy to detect false claims of being "experienced." <br><br>I'm also wary of people who trade on their alleged familiarity with exotic psychedelics in order to push their own crypto-archaeological, mystical, and paranormal views. <br><br>I'm a big Terence McKenna fan, by the way, I think he's a brilliant guy, and someone who most definitely did NOT front about his psychedelic experiences. But I wish he was still around, because I find so many of his insights disputable. We could have gotten into some great arguments, I'm sure. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 10/13/05 2:03 pm<br></i>