by professorpan » Tue May 16, 2006 6:40 pm
I'm aware of UFO cults, some of which date back to the 1950s. But UFO cults don't necessarily arise out of legitimate research organizations. I don't think MUFON, CAUS, or CUFOS have spawned cults. <br><br>CSETI and Greer have always been a bit on the whacko side. Greer in particular has been a bane to serious Ufology, with his flashlight-shining shenanigans and pimping anyone who claims to have been involved in a government coverup, no matter their credentials or how baseless their claims.<br><br>I think Mack did some groundbreaking work, although I don't agree with all of his conclusions. His ideas equating shamanic journeys to abductions resonates with my own theories about the phenomenon.<br><br>And Laurance giving money -- even big bucks -- to UFO organizations doesn't equate to cult-building. The simplest explanation, and one that is quite possible, is that he gave money to UFO groups because he was genuinely interested in furthering research into the phenomenon.<br><br>He was into environmental and conservation issues long before the environmental movement caught on with the public (he helped create several national parks, including National Redwoods Park, Grand Teton National Park, and several others). Again, some may see that as proof of a Rockefeller-orchestrated conspiracy to socially engineer an environmental movement for nefarious, globalist purposes. It's also quite possible to imagine that he was truly concerned about serious environmental issues. That idea would be anathema to those who consider the name Rockefeller to be equivalent to "Satanic Illuminati Overlord." But sometimes people in vastly wealthy, rapacious, and elitist families develop a conscience. <br><br>Very wealthy people are potentially open to exploring many of the issues discussed on this board. But unlike most of us, they have the capacity to pump money into organizations that otherwise might struggle to get meager funding. Without evidence to the contrary, I see no reason to assume he had any motive beyond wanting to fund research into a subject that piqued his interest. <br><br>We can't know, of course. I'm sure I'll be roundly accused of "debunking," but any assumptions of malign intent on the part of Laurance Rockefeller are just speculation unless there is evidence to the contrary. And I'm sorry, but having the family name of Rockefeller does not an evil person make.<br><br>I've worked with organizations that get money from philanthropists and foundations. Some of those foundations and individuals give money to make themselves look good or to generate good PR to combat a negative image (Exxon, for instance). Some very wealthy people, in contrast, really care about certain issues. There's often some residual guilt about being filthy rich, and they want to give back some of what they or their families have taken.<br><br>And I disagree with the broad statement "alien abduction is a hoax." I've met alleged abductees, and I'm convinced something happened to them -- something very traumatic. Something very real going on, though I don't think it has been proven to be alien, military/government, or paranormal. <br><br>And one last thing -- you say the CIIS logo is the Eye of Horus. All I see is a Tibetan mandala (I think it's the Sri Yantra, but I'm not sure). Where is the Eye of Horus?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>