rigorousintuition.ca

At thememoryhole.org: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/animal_esp.htm">www.thememoryhole.org/mil/animal_esp.htm</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br>Interesting conclusion:<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In view of the conditions and the control tests made, it is difficult to see how any olfactory basis of perception could be provided, and the only reasonable conclusion, although it is a tentative one, is that extrasensory perception, either in the man or the dog, has been operating in the underwater tests carried out by Dr. Ney and myself. Third, extrasensory perception has been demonstrated not only in man but in other animals, and the results obtained in the underwater tests harmonize well both in their percentage levels and the decline of the ability with the results obtained from cats and human beings.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>What are these other studies they reference? Are they known or are they classified? <p></p><i></i>