BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

by **Martin F Abernathy** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 10:53 am

Charles Schlunds's previous lawsuit against the U.S. government [Case No: CIV98-1875PHX ROS, reassigned to RCB] was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme in May 2001. ++++++++++ Charles August Schlund, III 8520 North 54th Drive Glendale, Arizona 85302 Phone 602-670-2017 Plaintiff In Pro Per IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, an individual, Plaintiff, v. George W. Bush, President of The United States of America, a sovereign nation; GEORGE W. BUSH, an individual; DOES 1-10, individuals, and DOES 11-20, entities, Defendants. ) Case No: CV-03-1590 PHX VAM FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES. AND, NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL (F.R.C.P. 38 and 39) Charles August Schlund, III ("Plaintiff Schlund"), an individual, alleges as follows: DEPRIVATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH RACKETEERING ACTIVITIES JURISDICTION 1. This action is brought pursuant to, including but not limited to, the Federal Torts Claim Act, 2 (a) U.S.C. Sections 2671 through 2680; 28 U.S.C. Section 1346 (b); 18 U.S.C. Section 1964; 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1988, Protection of Human Rights Act, the Convention Against Torture and Cruel, Inhumane, Degrading Treatment or Punished Act of June 26, 1987 and as amended thereafter, the Hague Convention; 42 U.S.C. Section 1981; 42 U.S.C. Section 1982, 1983, 1985 and 1986 of 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 [Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights] of said Title IX of Public Law 92-318 [2 U.S.C. (a) Section 1681 et seq.]; the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. Section 2000 (b) (b) et seq.]; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000(d) et seq.], including 13981 of said Title. Plaintiff’s leaves here to amend with additional law. 2. Jurisdiction is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1331, 1337. This matter includes allegations of illegal behavior arising under the laws of the United States, including, but not limited to, violations of Deprivation of Civil Rights through racketeering activities and Racketeer Influence and Corruption Organization (“RICO”). 18 U.S.C. Section 1964(a), (c) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1651 (a). Plaintiff and Defendants are “persons” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. Section 1961(3). The jurisdiction is proper in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332; the matter and controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000 and involves part of diverse citizenship or status under the Constitution. This court may exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s non-federal claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1367, as this court possesses both federal subject matter and/or diversity jurisdiction. VENUE 3. Plaintiff alleges that Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1965(a),Defendants reside, are found, operate under color of authority or office, have an agent or are connected with or related to the aforesaid, or transact affairs in this district. Venue is proper in this court pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1965 (b), to the extent any Defendant may reside outside this district, the ends of justice require such Defendant(s) to be brought before the Court. Venue properly lies in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (b) (2) or, alternatively, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (a) (2). PARTIES 4. Plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that the United States of America (“U.S.A.”), an international sovereign nation empowered, limited, and is controlled and its territorial boundaries established subject to its United States Constitution (hereinafter “Constitution”). It is a member in good standing with the Geneva Convention and avows against any use of deprivation of civil rights and torture. 5. Pursuant to the United States Constitution Articles I, II, and III, establishes the legislative powers, executive power, and the judicial power of the United States, respectively. On information and belief, George W. Bush, is an individual (“Defendant Bush” and sometimes referred to as the “George W. Bush” or “Bush Family”), under color of authority and office under the powers of Article II of the Constitution, utilized the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), U.S. Attorney General’s Office (“A.G.”), Homeland Security Department (“H.S.”) and department, agency, and entity for his own personal gain and to harass, persecute, and torture Plaintiff in concert with DOES 1-10 individuals, within the government and the private sector, and DOES 11-20 in the government and private entity as set forth herein. 6. Defendant Bush receives for his compensation for services payments from the United States Treasury to conduct the acts and conduct in a faithful manner and uptake and solemnly swears that he will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and will do the best of his ability to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. Under color of authority and office, he is also responsible for the aforesaid entities and those activities of DOES 1-10 individuals and DOES 11-20 entities, acting individually and in concert with one another as support therein pursuant to Article II of the Constitution. Also, under color of authority and office, Defendant Bush shall appoint judges of the Supreme Court and other officers of the United States whose appointment is not otherwise provided for and established by law under Article I of the Constitution. These appointments are not to be done for the purpose of supporting Defendants’ corrupt activities or corrupt individuals or/and activities in the government as alleged herein. 7. Plaintiff alleges, as a citizen of the U.S.A. that he has a legal right and duty to disclose and defend against the corrupt activities of Defendant Bush and his agents as set forth herein and any other illegal activities effecting his personal, financial interest, welfare, safety, or security as a citizen of U.S.A. This includes whistle blowing activity, and disclosure of same through the exercise of his Constitutional rights through use of the federal judicial system(s), direct communication to any branch of the federal government, and otherwise petition for redress as provided for under Article(s) 4, Sections 2 and 3, and as thereafter amended Article 1, IV, V, IX, X, or XIV of the United States Constitution. 8. Plaintiff alleges that pursuant to the four subdivisions of the United States Constitution, federal and/or state law of Arizona, including treaties entered into by the United States, there is a duty imposed on said Defendant and the judicial system to counter corrupt and any other illegal activities disclosed by Plaintiff Schlund as “political witness,” affecting his and other U.S. citizens personal rights, privileges, and amenities as a citizen of the United States and in the capacity of, as commonly referred to, as a “whistle blower” and/or a” political witness” as set forth herein. Plaintiff alleges the law protects his status and rights as aforesaid and shall not be subject to electronic invasion of his privacy or electronic torture, harassment, punishment or persecution of him or threats of same or other violations of his Constitutional rights by Defendant Bush and his agents through any method or/and medium of any nature or kind whatsoever, especially as a political witness against the aforesaid. 9. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that it is the legal duty imposed upon said Defendant to protect Plaintiff Schlund against harassment, torture, persecution, invasion of his privacy and other harm personally and to his financial interest related to Defendants’ use of the various financial institutions (i.e. Department of Treasury) and infrastructure within the government, including but not limited to, the federal judicial system. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS Plaintiff’s investigation of the facts and research of the law is continuous and ongoing and not yet complete. He leaves here to amend his complaint according to proof. ALLEGATIONS 10. Plaintiff alleges, on his information and belief and on those grounds, Defendants Bush and DOES herein carried out and continue to systematically carry out their plan, scheme, and design of deprivation of civil rights through racketeering activities, including but not limited to the following: 11. Plaintiff Schlund makes the following allegations on his information and belief and on those grounds, George Bush, Sr. (“Bush Sr.”) who in 1976 was the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”). Bush Sr. as the Director of the CIA in 1976, under the orders of Nelson Rockefeller, removed from the government all of the evidence of corruption, wrongdoing, crimes, and criminal acts including the detailed plans to fix the presidential elections of the United States. All of these files and documents, sometimes referred to as “evidence,” were removed from the government to conceal the information to prevent Jimmy Carter and those he would appoint to public office from accessing the information. This act by Bush Sr. constitutes an act of treason. The evidence contained various files, papers, documents, data, films, tape recordings, maps, log books, and other tangible items and things which were moved to be under Bush Sr.’s possession and control as he was ordered by Nelson Rockefeller. The said evidence and its contents are generally referred to as the “Don Bolles Papers,” unless denoted otherwise. 12. Plaintiff alleges the CIA and other files Plaintiff Schlund has always called the Don Bolles Papers contained massive amounts of information, much of which were authenticated U.S.A. documents related to illegal, immoral, criminal, private, corporate, and government covert operations, conducted under the highest level of control of the CIA, DEA, NSA, Justice Department, federal courts, and many others. These are the documents Plaintiff Schlund calls the Don Bolles Papers, and it is obvious to Plaintiff Schlund that these papers contained the highest levels of private/governmental planning regarding the systematic overthrow (private control) of the United States of America. 13. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers were then moved to Phoenix, Arizona by the CIA to one of the drug cartels that the CIA influenced, operated, and controlled known as the Dirty Dozen Motorcycle Gang (“DD”) which was a gang comprised of different organizational levels who had individuals involved at many levels within the government in the State of Arizona. The DD was operated and controlled by the CIA and was a drug cartel under the CIA’s and DEA’s influence and control. 14. Plaintiff alleges the DD was comprised of prospects, murderers, prostitutes, thieves, bikers, informants, private investigators, business owners, police officers, judges, federal agents, governors, senators, congressmen, and others. 15. Plaintiff alleges the Don Bolles Papers and files were then taken from the DD, actually the CIA, in a burglary resulting in the CIA losing control of these highly sensitive documents, plans, and other criminal evidence. 16. Plaintiff alleges on or about 1977, Plaintiff Schlund was one of the individuals of a group of people who received the Don Bolles Papers and files who, along with these other individuals, began to read and analyze them. 17. Further, Plaintiff alleges that the content of the Don Bolles Papers included documentation, which revealed a plan for the systematic overthrow of the U.S.A. using the CIA, Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and the judicial system and its courts and others under the color of law, which included Bush Sr. and Defendant Bush, the DOJ, certain members of Congress and the Senate, and other positions inside and outside the government. It was clearly indicated in the Don Bolles Papers that key positions were being obtained through the method of assassinations and the fixing of presidential and other elections and by political appointment to achieve the CIA’s goal of taking over and controlling key positions in the government and private sector. 18. Plaintiff asserts these files detailed George Bush Sr. and the CIA’s bugging of the White House, Camp David, Jimmy Carter’s home, and anyone else that could stand in their way or could become a threat to their empire at some time in the future, which currently includes Plaintiff and anyone closely associated with him. 19. The CIA monitored [everyone of interest] in the government from Congress to the President, and even the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Further, In the Don Bolles Papers were the files on the bugging of everyone that the CIA, Rockefeller family, Bush Family, or others considered a threat to their plans and joint operation. 20. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in the files he had were thousands of innocent people that were being kept under illegal, perpetual constant investigation and torture so they could be directed, controlled, manipulated, discredited, or assassinated if it became necessary. These created and fabricated investigations were initially authorized by the courts and conducted under the cover of authority and warrant. Some of the warrants were issued on the claims they were protecting these people from terrorists or kidnappers, and other warrants were issued after framing them as being involved in drugs or for other alleged criminal activity. In truth, none of these people were guilty of anything other than being good honest Americans with political beliefs different than the secret government that runs part of the United States government. 21. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that in these same files, Plaintiff Schlund read all the files of all the CIA operatives that were or would be involved in the systematic overthrow of America by the CIA. It included Defendant Bush and DOES 1- 10. 22. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief and on those grounds, that in the files that George Bush, Sr. removed from the government in 1976, there were thousands of files on political assassinations that had been or would be done in the future. 23. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that according to these CIA files George Bush Sr. controlled through the CIA and others the states of Florida, Texas, and Arizona. These states were more important to control than other states in order to protect the incoming drug shipments. These states were where the CIA ran their drugs into the United States. The illegal drugs were the common denominator that held the gangs together. These gangs furnished the children, girls, and boys for sex for the different corrupt judges and politicians and the drugs authorized many of the investigations against political witnesses (Plaintiff) and dissidents. The gangs and drugs created the crimes needed to authorize all the new laws as America became more and more conservative and more totalitarian. The drugs were the catalyst that held everything together, and the proceeds from the drugs helped finance many of the covert operations, resulting in the building of large expensive churches and the funding of the religious channels on T.V. and many other illegal covert CIA operations that were part of the systematic overthrow of the U.S.A. by the CIA. The drugs would be used in part to authorize trials, which would be used to establish new case law, which would result in the limiting of Constitutional Rights. In these CIA files, the American Constitution would remain intact as a piece of paper to hold up before the people that would in effect have no legal power to protect the people of the United States. The protections of the Constitution would be replaced by judicial made law which would be used by the Defendants to undermine and erode freedom, liberty, justice, and constitutional power. Legal rights, civil liberties, and other freedoms would no longer apply to the people, and politically appointed courts that were more often corrupt than not would decide who got real legal representation. In other words, if you were a drug dealer working for the government and you got busted, the sentence would be short or the arrest would be ruled illegal and the conviction would be overturned. If you were a political threat that had been set up, the sentence would be long and the court would rule that the arrest was legal and the conviction would stand. The drugs would also be used by the DEA and others to convict the blacks and other non-white minorities of drug-related crimes to remove their right to vote. 24. Further, on information and belief, Plaintiff Schlund alleges that this joint effort and agreement was calculated, conducted, and controlled to cover up George Bush, Sr., Defendant George W. Bush, and others’ illegal and systematic plans and operations to interfere with and fix the presidential elections of the U.S.A. and to cover up other federal and constitutional crimes which fit within the statutory categories of high crimes and misdemeanors. 25. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that the framing of Plaintiff Schlund was for the political purpose of justifying the need for a criminal and perpetual surveillance, violating personal rights to privacy of Plaintiff Schlund and others who associate with him under their constitutional right of freedom of association. Further, Plaintiff alleges that said investigations also serve the primary purpose to keep Plaintiff Schlund under perpetual surveillance, to administratively and politically target him and torture Plaintiff Schlund as a political witness who can and will testify against Defendant’s for high crimes and misdemeanors. Those under the government’s influence and control included, but were not limited to the various agencies, person(s) and organizations which had to place Plaintiff Schlund under constant and continual investigation, which such investigations, surveillance, harassment, persecution, and torture were ordered and/or ratified by corrupt, dishonest, paranoid, unethical, and evil corrupt judges and who issue judicial decisions under the pretext of law. 26. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges on information and belief that the investigations were then used to plant the needed evidence to frame Plaintiff Schlund and Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses. This was done and continues to be done to this day, Plaintiff Schlund was arrested and acquitted on all charges, including alleged drug conspiracy charges and alleged conspiracy drug manufacturing charges, which were specifically determined by U.S. District Court Judge Lacey to be nothing more than an act of fraud and violations of the law by government officials and their agents. Despite the acquittal, Plaintiff Schlund alleges that warrants were obtained and have continued to be obtained since the day of his acquittal, to be used as a pretext for perpetual investigations and surveillance of him and those he associates with, including his attorneys. These warrants are used to harass, persecute, and torture Plaintiff Schlund in an attempt to deter his ongoing disclosure of the illegal acts and conduct of the government and the Defendants individually, including President Bush. This is done to intimidate, harass, torture, and persecute Plaintiff Schlund as a political witness who has advised the F.B.I. of the activities by the Defendants, including the CIA, DEA and George W. Bush which, in each instance over the years (about 28 years) has materialized, including the recent demonstration of the fixing of the presidential election under color of authority and while using the judicial system and the corrupt judges on the highest levels to fix the presidential election which put George W. Bush in office as the President of the United States. The factual reality of the fixing of the presidential election at any cost to insure George W. Bush was placed in office as the President now remains historically undisputable as projected by Plaintiff with the Don Bolles Papers nearly 29 years ago, by those with a clear understanding of the facts and a clear, objective and rational mind. Further, the bogus warrants, although appearing to be procedurally valid, were actually illegal in substance and illegally used to obstruct and otherwise interfere with justice to harass, persecute, invade his privacy, and torture Plaintiff Schlund as a political witness. They were also issued and used to assassinate or threaten, harass, extort, and intimidate Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses, associates, friends, attorneys, family members, and others with threats to harm, execute, or jail them and/or their [children]. 27. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief, he has been and will continue to be kept under perpetual surveillance, harassed and tortured 24 hours a day, seven days a week, year after year as Defendants, and their agents and others working in a joint effort and a common scheme, plan and design to achieve the joint effort and benefit of said scheme while utilizing the corrupt judges and the influences of the Attorney General’s Office against Plaintiff Schlund as a political witness and those who associate with him. Plaintiff alleges he will be continuously, selectively, and administratively prosecuted with the procedure of the warrant and other methods and processes whereby as each warrant becomes invalid, new illegal, perpetual surveillance, harassment, and torture of him under color of law based on new investigations will continue. Plaintiff Schlund further alleges that as the perpetual harassment and torture increases dramatically, it sometimes puts Plaintiff Schlund close to death, and during such times he has agreed under torture to say things or make false conversations or false telephonic calls in exchange for relief from the torture or in exchange for sleep. Plaintiff alleges the above said Defendants, as part of the common scheme and joint agreement and effort, utilized, including but not limited to, invasion of privacy and sound harassment, which causes extreme pain and sleep deprivation as a form of torture against Plaintiff Schlund and those that associate with him. Defendants and their agents trespass and intrude into, on, and upon Plaintiff’s private land, home, computer, telephones, vehicles, financial information, personal and family activities, and business activities through the use of wireless technology of an electronic nature and associated products, including Plaintiff’s body. Further, Plaintiff alleges that sometimes these statements were made after Plaintiff Schlund was intentionally deprived of necessary sleep for up to six (6) days at a time and then allowing Plaintiff Schlund only a few hours of sleep before repeating the harassment and torture plan and scheme on a weekly basis for years. The sleep deprivation pattern, as aforesaid, has ultimately resulted at times in Plaintiff Schlund’s body physiologically collapsing, which remains undisputed. Plaintiff has become a diabetic, which has been directly linked to the activities of Defendants as set forth in this Complaint. His diabetes has resulted from thousands of nights of sleep deprivation and torture by the acts and conduct of Defendant Bush and DOES 1-10, and through government connected person(s) using wireless telemetry and electronic implants to intentionally interfere with and stop Plaintiff Schlund from sleeping. 28. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, he set up the corrupt federal and state judges and DEA and other agents for the FBI. While setting up the corrupt people in the government, Plaintiff briefed the FBI on the information Plaintiff had, including the plans for the systematic overthrow of the United States by the Bush family, CIA, DEA, and others. 29. Plaintiff alleges that in 1992 and thereafter, he briefed the FBI on how the CIA would use the Electoral College to fix the presidential elections if the elections could not be fixed by splitting the vote using CIA controlled third and fourth political party. The Electoral College would only be used if all other methods failed and was only the way of last resort to put their people in power. Plaintiff briefed the FBI in great detail on how the Electoral College would be used as a way of fixing the presidential elections. 30. In 1992, at the request of the FBI, Plaintiff Schlund began to supply the FBI with the names of the Supreme Court judges that worked for the CIA and the Bush and Rockefeller families. Plaintiff Schlund supplied the FBI with five United States Supreme Court Justices’ names from the CIA files (Don Bolles Papers) Plaintiff Schlund had read and from other information Plaintiff Schlund had, and these five judges were the five United States Supreme Court Judges that seven or eight years later stopped the recount of the presidential votes in Florida and appointed George W. Bush to the presidency of the United States of America. During these briefings to the FBI, Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI of what was in three of these judges’ CIA files, including all the details of their corruption and crimes and why they had picked to be appointed as Supreme Court Justices on the United States Supreme Court. 31. In May or June of 1992, Plaintiff Schlund went to Washington D.C. to set up the Washington Post for the FBI. While in Washington, D.C., the CIA, DEA, or others controlled and electronically intruded on Plaintiff Schlund’s motel phone lines. Plaintiff Schlund then tried to call the FBI and the CIA, DEA, or others intercepted the call with a recording that the FBI’s phone lines were not in service. Plaintiff Schlund then called the phone company operator and told her that this was an emergency, and that he needed her to dial the FBI for him. This call went through, and the FBI answered and immediately sent out a phone truck to switch the phone lines in the telephone company pedestal in front of the motel to stop the CIA’s control of Plaintiff’s phone lines. The FBI then called back and said to go ahead. Plaintiff Schlund then called the Washington Post to prove to the FBI how the Washington Post, working for the CIA, had covered up Watergate (The attempted overthrow of the United States) and how they would be used to cover up the information Plaintiff Schlund was trying to supply to the FBI. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he later also briefed the FBI that the Miami Herald was also one of their newspapers and was under their control, and that the Bush Family and others controlled what they printed to a large degree. The Miami Herald did the recount confirming the results of the presidential elections in Florida, and the Washington Post confirmed the Miami Herald’s findings. In other words, the CIA covertly confirmed the CIA’s findings. Plaintiff’s privacy was violated and he continues to be electronically harassed and tortured as a political witness thereafter to present. 32. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that he also briefed the FBI on the new electronic implants that the CIA had designed, which were being mass produced in 1977 by the National Security Administration (“NSA”). These electronic implants could be used to fix ball games, horse races, and dog races, or to fix presidential or local elections. They were being injected into large numbers of people in investigations and used to monitor and control selectively targeted people to cover up the massive corruption in the government, which involved the Bush Family. They could not make Republicans vote for Democrats, and they could not make Democrats vote for Republicans; but they could stop them from voting, if needed. These electronic devices or implants could also influence who independent voters would vote for. George Bush, Sr. and the CIA planned on using these electronic devices whenever possible to corruptly fix future presidential elections of the United States and other countries around the world. The fixing of the American presidential elections with these electronic devices was not only possible, but also easy when used in conjunction with other covert operations. George Bush and the CIA had planned on trying to fix all future presidential elections using these electronic devices and implants controlled by super computers and sometimes controlled directly by people. This process was simple, and the devices would be used to make the implanted person feel physiologically/psychologically sick any time they heard the name of the person they were not to vote for; and they would make the injected person feel good and have a feeling of great joy and well-being any time the injected person heard the name of who they were supposed to vote for. Plaintiff Schlund has been harassed, tortured, and stopped from voting on Election Day with such technology and devices. In the Don Bolles papers George W. Bush was fully briefed on all of this CIA and other information. 33. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he also briefed the FBI in 1992, 1993 and thereafter on George Bush, Sr.’s, Nelson Rockefeller’s, and the CIA’s plans to put their corrupt people in key positions in the Federal and State courts. This process had already been going on for many years with many of these corrupt judges already being on the bench. These corrupt and evil judges were making their legal rulings based on corruption, corrupt influences, and evil, not on law or the Constitution. Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI of how some of these judges would assume their positions which were predesignated in some cases 20 years in advance, after being selected for these positions. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he briefed the FBI that he had read through hundreds of files of corrupt judges or future corrupt judges. Plaintiff Schlund alleges he briefed the FBI that some of these judges were pedophiles and others were murderers or drug dealers and others were just evil or corrupt. Each of these files had a list of people who were political witnesses, like Plaintiff, that could be possible witnesses against these corrupt and evil judges. In each file was who the CIA, DEA, or others were to assassinate and who was to be harassed, committed as insane, persecuted, imprisoned, tortured, or given different illnesses or conditions to remove them as potential witnesses. The Bush Family could appoint these corrupt and evil people to the federal or state bench pretending they were Christians and moral people with all the witnesses against them being dead or discredited or/and in prison. 34. Plaintiff Schlund, on information and belief, alleges that Defendant intentionally entered into illegal agreements before becoming President and thereafter to violate U.S. Constitutionally protected right to privacy authorizing implants and to do everything to overturn the case: Roe vs. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) as part of the corrupt plan, scheme, and design to deprive Plaintiff and others of the right to privacy. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that in 1992 and 1993 he briefed the FBI on George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller’s and others plans to overturn in part Roe v. Wade. The Roe v. Wade case was a threat to the empire. The United States Justice Department had briefed George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller that Roe v. Wade could be interpreted as a human rights ruling giving the people the right to their own bodies. If American citizens had a right to their own bodies, electronic implants, forcibly or covertly installed, would be illegal. George Bush, Sr. and the United States Department of Justice believed that the ruling of Roe v. Wade could be successfully used in court to create case law that could make the government’s use of electronic implants illegal. George Bush, Sr. and Nelson Rockefeller planned on conducting the CIA covert operation of overturning Roe v. Wade in part to make a legal exception so the use of covertly installed electronic implants could still be done under the cover and color of law. George Bush, Sr. did not want to stop abortion. All he wanted was to make an exception to the ruling so that implants could be legally used against political witnesses and dissidents such as Plaintiff so corrupt public officials and judges could be protected using the cover of investigations which would use implants to monitor, harass, persecute, torture, and murder political witnesses, including Plaintiff Schlund. 35. Plaintiff Schlund alleges that he has a right to be free from intrusion and implants used for torture and/or surveillance, violating his body privacy and other privacy rights within expected orbits and zones of privacy. The government’s placing of implants into Plaintiff Schlund’s body, as alleged herein, violates and deprives him of his civil rights to privacy under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the holding of Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) because he is a political witness against Defendant Bush and DOES 1-20. 36. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief, that in order to succeed in Defendant Bush’s schemes, plans, and efforts to overthrow the United States government, part of the systematic plan would require the modification or elimination of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade. To eliminate this decision achieves the result of eliminating the inalienable [right] or a person’s [right] to personal privacy and all other connected privacies as well. Such is being accomplished on Plaintiff Schlund by electronic intrusions and torture at present. 37. Plaintiff alleges that in these files, The Bush family had assured their people that they controlled the federal courts and that the courts would not allow anyone to go to trial over the use of the implantable devices and the government would deny their use of the implants under the protection of their corrupt Attorney Generals and federal judges. 38. In 1991, Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI on how the DEA had people murdered in front of Plaintiff’s wife in order to threaten her and to force her to work for the DEA against her husband, Plaintiff Schlund. These murders were committed under the orders, protection, and direction of the DEA, police, the Justice Department, and the courts. These murders could then be blamed on Plaintiff Schlund, and if Plaintiff’s wife refused to aid the DEA in their crimes, her children would be murdered. The DEA also threatened to murder Plaintiff Schlund and his witnesses. The police refused and continue to refuse to take or allow murder reports from Plaintiff Schlund and refused to allow any of the witnesses to testify to them or before any juries. The police and the DEA and others then injected all the known witnesses with electronic implants and proceeded to monitor, harass, torture, invade their privacy, and control them with these implants, to threaten them any time they said anything about those involved in these government murders or anything else that the government was covering up. This obstruction of justice and witness tampering continues to this day with the Justice Department and others continuing to threaten the lives of the Plaintiff’s witnesses and refusing to stop the use of torture to threaten the witnesses. 39. These acts of evil by Defendants against Plaintiff as a political witness have continued since 1977 on a daily basis, to the present time and have caused and will continue to cause irreparable harm and injury to Plaintiff. 39. Plaintiff alleges that everything asserted in advance to the FBI by Plaintiff Schlund was confirmed true by the test of time, as Plaintiff Schlund briefed the FBI that it would. Because of these briefings by Plaintiff to the FBI, he continues to be harassed, persecuted and tortured as a political witness. 40. Plaintiff Schlund alleges, on information and belief and evidence, that Defendants use and will continue to use as part of their plan and scheme of persecution, harassment, and torture of him, this method of electronic torture to violate fundamental constitutional rights of Plaintiff Schlund and other similarly situated plaintiffs. Doran v. McGinnes, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994). This case is systematically used to invalidate valid civil rights cases filed against the government’s use of wireless technology and associated product technology which includes electronic implants used by Defendant and his agents for different purposes. This defense is used against cases filed in the federal court which assert legitimate claims such as those Plaintiff Schlund has filed against the government in their use of an integrated system of wireless electronic-force technology to hurt a person. It then systematically uses the United States Attorney General’s Office, and attorneys, to assert the unmeritorious argument in motions for summary judgment that (all) implant technology civil rights cases are connected to “implant mental telepathy” similar to Doran. Then, allegedly, a less technologically informed judge or a purely corrupt judge disregards the disputed, relevant material facts, normally within the province of a jury, grants the motion, and prematurely procedurally, terminates Plaintiff’s actions and other less informed lawsuits after routinely “staying” all of [a] plaintiff’s discovery. Then routinely dismisses the case, cutting off the constitutional right to a jury trial. Plaintiff Schlund’s torture as a political witness continues, under the pretext of color of authority, in reality, and is illegal and corrupt as aforesaid, causing irreparable injury and harm requiring injunctive relief to maintain the status quo. 41. The torture being inflicted against Plaintiff Schlund is at times worse than being crucified and then skinned alive, over and over again. The only difference is that this torture is being done on the inside of Plaintiff Schlund, not leaving marks on the outside for people to see. On September 10, 2005 the Defendant’s attempted to assassinate Plaintiff Schlund and then deprived Plaintiff Schlund of sleep and dramatically increased Plaintiff Schlund’s torture in an attempt to stop this lawsuit from being filed. The torture of Plaintiff Schlund is done [in hopes of] forcing Plaintiff Schlund to commit some crime in his self-defense, which would allow the government to remove him as a political witness under the cover of law. These acts are acts of violations of federal law prohibiting persecution, harassment, torture, terrorism, electronic stalking, assault, battery, trespass, invasion of privacy, etc. and will continue to deprive Plaintiff of his civil rights, causing him irreparable injury and damages in excess of $75,000, which is continuous and ongoing in an amount according to proof. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants and each of them, individually, jointly, and severally, as follows: 1. For all compensatory damages for pain and suffering, etc. in the amount of $20 million or according to proof; 2. For all costs of suit, including attorney fees, investigators, and other related fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1877 or/and the Private Attorney General Act or according to proof; 3. For all special damages in the amount of $40 million according to proof; 4. For all treble damages based on compensatory damages per RICO statue according to proof; 5. For all costs incurred in this action according to proof; 6. The court is hereby demanded to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Federal Code of Civil Procedures, Rule 52, on each and all issues of specific and ultimate facts raised in this Complaint; [This demand shall constitute a continuing demand and shall not be deemed waived unless specifically done so by Plaintiff, in writing, in a separately filed, notarized pleading with the court entitled, “Notice of Waiver of Finding of Fact and Conclusion.”]; 7. For all pre-judgment interest in an amount according to proof; and 8. For all such other further relief as the Court deems just, fair and proper under the circumstances. Dated: September 15, 2005 By: ______________________________________ Charles August Schlund, III In Pro Per VERIFICATION AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL I, Charles August Schlund, III, have read my Verified Complaint. The facts therein are of my own personal knowledge and are true and correct, except as to those facts I believe to be true and correct on information and my belief. I declare the aforegoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge under penalty of perjury. By ______________________________________ Charles August Schlund, III STATE OF ARIZONA ) ) ss. COUNTY of Maricopa ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 15th day of September, 2005. ________________________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: _______________________ 15th day of September, 2005 to: Clerk of the Court U.S. District Court of Arizona 401 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ. 85009 and COPIES of the foregoing mailed to: Mr. Richard G. Patrick Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Arizona Two Renaissance Square 40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200 Phoenix Arizona 85004-4408 Fax: (602) 514-7760 Office: (602) 514-7500 George W. Bush, President of the United States The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500 Mr. George W. Bush, an individual C/O The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue N. W. Washington, D.C. 20500 By ____________________________

by **dbeach** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:03 am

WELCOME Martin GOOD FIND SEE ANOTHER legal case of possible significance which I posted below MORE CASES at these villains the better "German attorney:Complaint CRIMINAL To Patrick Fitzgerald -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS IS FUN...Is it real..?? www.cloakanddagger.de/med...PLAINT.htm Ramifications of the Valery Plame Leak Case, to wit: - Bribery of Justice Antonin Scalia in Bush v. Gore - Criminal Aspects of 9-11-1

by **dbeach** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:09 am

do you have a link???

by **Martin F Abernathy** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:18 am

You have to join this Yahoo Group: <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mcforums/">groups.yahoo.com/group/mcforums/</a> to be able to read the orinial message at this URL: <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mcforums/message/42222">groups.yahoo.com/group/mc...sage/42222</a> I have met Charles Schlund [January-February 2003] and I know that he is legitimate, sane and honest. Martin F. Abernathy Providence, RI

by **dbeach** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:26 am

<a href="http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/873731.shtml">newswire.indymedia.org/en...3731.shtml</a> THIS SITE IS DOWN Never heard of the lawsuit but the bush criminals need more listening to Tom Flocco who is saying scalia was bribed and the Fitzie indictmnets are real..this is from 9/13/05 radio broadcast.. Bush sr was at airport where JFK jrs plane was during the wk of JFK jrs death

by **schizotypal** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Margie Denise Schoedinger, a Texas woman who filed a rape lawsuit against George W. Bush in December 2002, found dead in September 22, 2003 <img src="http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/Detail5.jpg" style="border:0;"/> <img src="http://www.vestigialconscience.com/BushRapeSuit/In%20the%20western%20world,%20only%20one%20newspaper%20reports%20the%20suicide%20of%20the%20woman%20who%20accused%20George%20W%20Bush_files/Bushtoplower2.jpg" style="border:0;"/> http://www.opednews.com/thoreau1103bush_rape_suicide.htm http://www.rense.com/general32/CCCIVIL217038-1-7.pdf http://www.chron.com/class/obits/archive/qsearch.hts?operation=getdoc&database=Obituaries%3B%20&databases=Obituaries%3BObituaries%3BObituaries%3BObituaries%3B&docid=76532&docids=%2076532%3B76200%3B76168%3B46566%3B&query=schoedinger+NOT+3:RSEC&pos=1&numhits=%2025&start=&type=&user=houston&sview=1&hview=2&dview=1 http://ccweb.co.fort-bend.tx.us/docdetail.asp?id=%0BNDcV%21WY%03v%21UM%2F%21zY%3D4fck2M&ms=0&cabinet=death&pg=&id2=TIvMLm%21HI%03%0FMxbgIQH%21ODAzo0T%21dy8yM Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=schizotypal@rigorousintuition>schizotypal</A> at: 9/16/05 10:16 am

by **dbeach** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:15 pm

RIP FOR THAT POOR SOUL lots of strange deaths,sucicides,plane crashes since 11/22/63. WONDER WHY????

by **Martin F Abernathy** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:28 pm

Charles Schlund will *not* be found dead. There are some patriotic FBI agents who are loyal to the U.S. Constitution that they swore to defend, and they are making sure that Charles Schlund stays alive. The court might try to [illegally] dismiss his lawsuit, but he will not be 'suicided'. Every move that Chuck makes is closely monitored by his friends as well as his enemies.

by **dbeach** » Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:50 pm

GLAD TO HEAR THAT THERE THERE ARE FBI PATRIOTS REMAINING IN GOVT Wonder why the site is down?? Citizen Spook has had his blog gooned as has Flocco in past few wks. Do you have a date for your article besides latest breaking news? any site so I can share this others. THANX

BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: Schlund V. Bush

Re: Schlund V. Bush

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Re: BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA LAWSUIT THREATENS BUSH PRESIDENCY

Who is online