"I'm the Decider"

Moderators: DrVolin, 82_28, Elvis, Jeff

"I'm the Decider"

Postby Moddey Screbbagh » Wed Apr 19, 2006 9:31 pm

have to admit, this is pretty damn funny:<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/">"I'm the Decider"</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br><br>http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/ <p></p><i></i>
Moddey Screbbagh
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "I'm the Decider"

Postby tigre63 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:06 pm

If you play that backwards you can hear 'Condi is dead'. <p></p><i></i>
tigre63
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "I'm the Decider"

Postby greencrow0 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 10:40 pm

Yes, that's a <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>good</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> one! : )<br><br>GC<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: "I'm the Decider"

Postby Col Quisp » Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:49 am

That's sooooo great! Thanks for making my day! <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Col Quisp
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 2:52 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

letter in NYT today - interesting point

Postby Moddey Screbbagh » Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:05 pm

letter-to-the-editor in today's NYT makes an interesting point, which makes sense to me:<br><br>(link may require sign in)<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/20/opinion/l20dowd.html?_r=2&n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fLetters&oref=slogin&oref=slogin" target="top">NYT letter to the editor</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><br>To the Editor:<br><br>Re "The Decider Sticks With the Derider" (column, April 19):<br><br>There's a conundrum hidden within Maureen Dowd's column about the failure of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. It's one I've been puzzling over since the Bush administration began its drumbeat for war in Iraq.<br><br>There is now considerable evidence — from Richard A. Clarke, the former counterterrorism adviser, former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and other former members of the administration — to support Ms. Dowd's statement that <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Mr. Rumsfeld "wanted to invade Iraq because he thought it would be easy."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br>But if Mr. Rumsfeld and his colleagues truly believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, how easy could the invasion be?<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Common sense suggests only one answer: We invaded Iraq not because we thought Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but because we thought he didn't.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <br><br>The administration would like us to think that it was simply mistaken about the threat posed by Saddam Hussein; but that's yet another lie, and perhaps the biggest one of all.<br><br>Jack Lechner<br><br>New York, April 19, 2006<br><br>The writer was an executive producer of "The Fog of War: Eleven Lessons From the Life of Robert S. McNamara." <br><br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Moddey Screbbagh
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 10:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to Bush Family

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests