by cointelpro » Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:44 pm
Anyone who's visited Rense.com in the past couple of days has seen the splash photos of Bush-Abramoff together. Link: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://rense.com/1.imagesH/bushabramoff.jpg">rense.com/1.imagesH/bushabramoff.jpg</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>Now, Time Magazine has the bombshell story: The First Photo of Abramoff & Bush. Link: <!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1158908,00.html">www.time.com/time/nation/...08,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><br>Turns out, the "bombshell photo" Time chooses to print shows only Abramoff, circled in red, in the background of a room 25 feet away from Bush.<br><br><br>Anyone who looks at the Rense photos sees Bush shaking Abramoff's hand.<br><br><br>Why would Time Magazine choose to alter the real story?<br><br><br>A textbook example of disinformation: Close to the truth, but not the real truth. Not enough information to damage, just enough information to provide political excuses: "See? The Time photo wasn't so bad." <p></p><i></i>