Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby antiaristo » Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:52 pm

I'm not going to post here any more.<br><br>There is more than enough information here to work it ALL out.<br><br>IF YOU WANT TO:<br><br>LOOK INTO YOUR OWN HEARTS.<br><br>I'm not going to flog a dead horse any further. <p></p><i></i>
antiaristo
 
Posts: 2555
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 9:50 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby Byrne » Tue Feb 14, 2006 1:57 pm

John,<br><br>A word of appreciation from me for your edifying contribution here.<br><br>Your posts have made sense to me.<br><br>Byrne<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
Byrne
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby sunny » Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:13 pm

John, perhaps you have flogged your particualar area of interest to it's conclusion? what is to stop you from moving on to other subjects? We appreciate your doggedness, and it would be a shame for you to go away.<br><br>Sonya <p></p><i></i>
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Confluence of Concurrences

Postby Floyd Smoots » Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:34 pm

antiaristo, old boy, I've Always appreciated your posts, but have "tried" to comment on only those of which I actually might have some knowledge.<br><br>Alexander F. Mutter, B.A., D.S.,b.<br>(that's Doctor of Scatology, bovine) <br><!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p></p><i></i>
Floyd Smoots
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 11:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Youre not flogging a dead horse.

Postby slimmouse » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:02 pm

completely to the Contrary John, youre offering a priceless insight into how it all goes down.<br><br> Im like floyd, I dont usually comment , because theres little I can personally add.<br><br> It will be a sad day for this board, if you leave John.<br><br> Oh, and, you asked me a question on the free energy link board regarding Bearden, which I missed until just now.<br><br> What do I make of him ? Its just so hard to tell. But my rule of thumb these days is to look carefully at what people aren't saying as much as what they are in order to gauge their trustability.<br><br> However much of what he says concurs with just about all Ive read on the subject myself, and also with what someone, who I consider to be a real expert in the ZP field has explained to me in very simple terms.<br><br> He also talks about how the academic and scientific institutions arent run on the basis of whats beneficial for mankind, but of course whats profitable for their sponsors, and how the parameters of thermodynamics are deliberately held in check, indeed are being drawn back, despite the overwhelming amount of experimental results to the contrary - for all the obvious monetary reasons. <br><br> Its rather like '9/11 goes free energy', if you will.<br><br> He talks at length about their debunking techniques, including a plant introducing inventors to "venture capitalists" who will himself then go to the authorities, and get immunity from prosecution by exposing a "money laundering operation disguised as venture capital to an inventor" ( which the grass has himself organised ), and the inventor does 20 years in the Pen, or has his name and reputation suitably "debunked" <br><br> The use of lethal force, threats and all the rest of it to the real cute scientists. The ridiculous stand of the patent office, which actually outlaws the patenting of a perpetual motion device - since according to the now ever narrowing parameters of Science ( see above ) there is no such thing - despite the fact that atoms have been in perpetual motion for 15 billion years.<br><br> None of any of this should come as any real surprise to anyone familiar with the parapolitical. And yet strangely enough, it often does on this board ! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br> He talks about Tesla, and the soviets, and many other things. <br><br> He interestingly enough uses the term "the results of the experiments are absolutely rigorous" and emphasises that point at great length.<br><br> et cetera et cetera et cetera. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=slimmouse@rigorousintuition>slimmouse</A> at: 2/14/06 8:26 pm<br></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Please don't go

Postby mother » Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:19 pm

Please reconsider, John. Unless it is to start your own blog. Your facts, ideas and writing are superb; we love your courage and your opinions. Please don't be hasty. love, m. xxxooo <p></p><i></i>
mother
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

wish you wouldn't

Postby blanc » Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:55 pm

few commentators on the european side of things as it is. I don't pretend to understand the whole of your take on TFA, but have been glad you were posting. <p></p><i></i>
blanc
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 4:00 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

antiaristo do not go

Postby madeupname452 » Tue Feb 14, 2006 6:14 pm

i mainly come to this board to read your posts and commentaries.thank you for what you have revealed here.i hope you will reconsider. <p></p><i></i>
madeupname452
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 10:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

anti-aristo

Postby Qutb » Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:15 pm

I don't buy your views on the British royal family and a lot of other things, but many of your posts have been very informative and I've learned a few things. You're never going to convince me the House of Windsor rules the world, but I hope you'll reconsider leaving the board. <p></p><i></i>
Qutb
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 2:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: anti-aristo

Postby dbeach » Tue Feb 14, 2006 7:47 pm

HOW don't rule the world only the dumb nations that have their blue blood relatives<br><br>ANTI <br><br>Say it ain't so John.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: anti-aristo

Postby slimmouse » Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:01 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr> HOW don't rule the world only the dumb nations that have their blue blood relatives<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br> And if I might add, have extended their influence virtually globally via their Secret Society Networks.<br><br> Gorbachev/Reagan funny handshake recorded on camera springs to mind.<br><br> But of course their can only be one Queen Bee. It's the hive mentality - The hive of course also being another major FM symbol.<br><br> Coinkydink, coinkydink, coinkydink <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby StarmanSkye » Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:11 pm

Jeez, John.<br><br>I disagree with you 'dead-horse' analogy. I've found much valuable insight from your posts. Over time, I see more and more, the pieces have begun to connect in a faintly-recognized pattern, the veil flutters and I can SEE what lies behind the carefully-constructed facade of illusion and lies. <br><br>Like slimouse, I often don't post when I can't add much to discussion. And as blanc comments, there are much-too precious few posters providing a european perspective to this forum. And like Qutb, I remain sketical that the House of Windsor is THE locus for world Imperial rule by the PTB, though no doubt playing a major role in world affairs.<br><br>With VERY few exceptions, almost everybody on this forum contributes to a very rich, information-dense discussion and exchange of ideas. You are certainly among those regulars I have a lot of respect for, and think this site will be the poorer for your leaving. I sure hope you'll reconsider, or perhaps leave the door open at least for a hiatus, or call it a sabbatical or break -- Because of the emotionally-and-intellectually challengiung nature of parapolitics in the 21st century, it's especially useful if not necessary to be able to just go 'away' once inna while and spend more of one's time in the 'ordinary' and more localized, personal, immediate sense, reaquaint oneself to rather mundane, less disturbing mysteries and wonders and challenges of life.<br><br>Sure would like to 'see' and read you again, tho.<br><br>Anyway -- it's been, well, interestingly *strange*, fer shure.<br>Good luck and best thoughts, always.<br>May you walk in beauty, Be strong.<br>Starman <p></p><i></i>
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby havanagila » Tue Feb 14, 2006 8:40 pm

If not your insistence I wouldn't take the time to think about the brittish royalty being a totally corrupt and overreaching org and I am indebted for the Archer story I was not aware of. <br>I hope you get to unite with your family soon, and I do hope you return after a break, maybe you are burnt out a bit.<br>-- Anyway, even if the windsors are the devil incarnate, you can't do much about it, except heal and get stronger ! i guess that's being a bit naive, though.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
havanagila
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 2:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Personal Statement From John Cleary - antiaristo

Postby dbeach » Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:09 pm

so the current mullah of Iran was a radical .. ha ha ..in 1979 <br><br>hmm ...so he helped GHW Bush with the OCT surprise<br><br>and NOW he again helps the queens viceroy GHW Bush <br>with his constant fear mongering.<br><br>All CIA Duh = Al qeada<br><br>so many of the same ole actors <br><br>"The White House yesterday ratcheted up tensions with Iran by saying it was taking seriously claims by Americans held hostage in the 1979 Tehran embassy siege that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's president-elect, was one of their captors. <br><br>President George Bush said "many questions" had been raised by the allegations that Mr Ahmadinejad was one of the leaders of the radical student group who seized the embassy and held 52 hostages for 444 days. <br><br>The extraordinary claims were made yesterday by five of the former hostages who said the incoming Iranian president had been involved in interrogations during the embassy drama. "As soon as I saw his picture in the paper, I knew that was the bastard," Colonel Charles Scott, 73, told the Washington Times. "He was one of the top two or three leaders ... The new president of Iran is a terrorist." "<br><br><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="https://www.buzzle.com/editorials/6-30-2005-72373.asp">/www.buzzle.com/editorial...-72373.asp</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--> <p></p><i></i>
dbeach
 
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 7:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

bullshit

Postby smithtalk » Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:43 pm

you are not flogging a dead horse,<br><br>and i emplore you to give up this absurd notion,<br><br>you post a lot of complex information that is invaluable and quite obviously very much appreciated,<br>its often just not the sort of stuff that people can reply to,<br><br>anyway this place is like a drug, it has positive and negative effects but its very hard to leave alone <p></p><i></i>
smithtalk
 
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 10:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest