On Turning Forty while reading the RI board

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

DE

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:21 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>when this stuff is allowed to continue, AND when you allow Thumper to repost</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>If this board were <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>WKRP in Cincinnati</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> - and sometimes I wish it were - I'd very much be Mr Carlson: nominally in command, only marginally aware of what's going on.<br><br>About "stuff being allowed to continue." It presumes I'm aware of stuff continuing. I can't read every thread, and I don't read closely every thread I do read. I'm the only moderator here (and looking at admin tools, I don't know how I can share the load), and I need people to IM me when they see something out of sorts. <br><br>About thumperton. As I think I wrote above in this thread, his username is <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>still</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> supposedly banned, so I don't know how he was able to post again. It wasn't a choice I made. Still, allowing him to continue to post until he violates the rules again was my choice. (Though how I'm supposed to ban him again, since he's supposedly already banned, I don't know. I guess I'll have to figure that out when the time comes.) As you said, he admitted to mental issues on another board. But something like that predisposes me to act more charitably towards him; a charity I don't extend to other posters such as "Free Zundel" whom I've rebanned many times when he's reappeared under various guises. And the charity extends only until I see another infringement upon the board's rules.<br><br>on edit: A disclaimer of sorts to distinguish the board from the blog is a good idea. I hadn't thought it necessary - it seemed self-evident to me that a discussion board of many voices would not be confused with my own voice - but since the RI name is shared it's probably prudent and appropriate to do so. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=rigorousintuition>Rigorous Intuition</A> at: 3/7/06 11:30 am<br></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DE

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:40 pm

let's stop fighting<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/grouphug.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

What I said

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:54 pm

My primary rule when posting on a forum is to speak from the heart...truer than in 'real life' where I have to maintain a certain POV for work, another for home, etc.<br><br>Here I am myself....with all my foibles, biases, etc. When it comes to what the poster said about his wife, then quickly detouring from that heartfelt sharing of his personal turmoils to... <br><br>...a coldblooded dismissal of a theory that others discuss on this other threads on this board. Those who believe in CD reject the Bushie Agenda and all its criminality, while those who reject CD...in essence, even though many equivocate, accept the Bushie agenda and the racist myth of OBL etc.<br><br>There was something disconcertingly disingenous about the poster when he made that shift.<br><br>Another point, mental illness is a reality. I think SOME of those who believe in mind control want to minimize and/or dismiss the impact and prevalence in our society of mental illness...and ascribe all the symptoms of mental illness to mind control. This is a huge error, IMO.<br><br>Even before I discovered this board, I believed there were experiments going on by government, etc. to brainwash and control human behaviour...I still believe this.<br><br>But much of what that poster described about his wife's behaviour seemed to me possible symptoms of mental illness. Some people think to say someone is mentally ill is to insult them. You should think carefully about your attitude towards mental illness if you believe that.<br><br>I have seen mental illness up close and personal in my own family. It IS a terrible scourge...I have also seen it overcome through psychiatric medicine. I have seen where it can be 'lived with' courageously and fully.<br><br>My point was that when two individuals with mental illness attempt to 'treat' each other...this can lead to a lifetime of heartbreak for themselves and for all who love them.<br><br>You can accept that POV or reject it. I'm speaking from the heart and from experience.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DE

Postby NewKid » Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:54 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>New Kid is stranger than just "fast eyeballs".<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><br>Well, for once we agree, anti. But I really wasn't judging your case by my comment; I really wasn't. And I'm not a govt disinfo agent either (although before I got this gig at Rendon, I was a GS 13-10 in Technical Services at Langley. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rollin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/roll.gif ALT=":rollin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> )<br><br>Now, if I concede that you are being harrassed by illuminati law firms, will you take Dreams End's advice, and just consider the possibility you might be overreacting? Please? If you don't go talk to someone, at least put away the case file, get out of the flat, walk around outside, get some fresh air, and go see the ladyfriend or something. I swear, your perspective will change. <p></p><i></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re:antiaristo

Postby havanagilla » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:01 pm

I'll take this opportunity (though its not directly connected) to protest your use of terms such as "talmud merchant". I am a bit less concerned about it, so it may seem like accepting it, I take it as a mental health issue, namely, a need to sort of curse or use foul language, in a way that actually hurts YOU, and not the other person. <br>I don't know what talmud merchant is at all, due to ignorance or english illiteracy but it sounds really bad. Since I have a lot of experience with people who are in deep distress, I am overlooking a lot stuff that others don't. But it is annoying, espcially if one (as I am) happens to be the subject of the curse. That applies also to those who ask "are YOU jewish ????" its almost tempting to add :everyone take their pants off and let's see if you are circumcized. <br>Here again, since I am an Israeli (didn't live with antisemitism at all) and also aware of why some people might feel overwhelmed with ISrael's position - I am not even registering this. Namely, my brain skips these terms as in rubbish or background noise.<br>And Yes, it does look bad to newcomers, who don't know what and who is who. it looks like slime. So if you want to salvage your own self respect, reconsider those terms, or make very clear what is talmud merchant and how it can be justified to use it publicly.<br>I think DE is correct in his protests, even though I personally overlook these utterances, but not everyone does or should do that. <p></p><i></i>
havanagilla
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:02 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: DE

Postby NewKid » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:05 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>on edit: A disclaimer of sorts to distinguish the board from the blog is a good idea. I hadn't thought it necessary - it seemed self-evident to me that a discussion board of many voices would not be confused with my own voice - but since the RI name is shared it's probably prudent and appropriate to do so. <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>I wouldn't think so either, Jeff, but the rightwing blogs bitch about this all the time for LGF and it's their excuse for why they don't have comments sections. Now I don't think a reasonable observer can attribute what's said here to you, but I do think a disclaimer would be a good idea because the one thing I could easily see happening is some Village Voice story on conspiracy theory start citing some of the more ridiculous shit that's put out here as though you/we all believe it. <br><br>Now, there's no real way to stop that, but given that you have the ability to make the disclaimer, I'd go ahead and make it and put it up front on the main discussion board page. You know, something like you have an open mind; support free speech and the marketplace of ideas; don't have time to monitor; if they want to know what you think, read the blog; have to kiss a bunch of frogs to find a prince in this business; aren't responsible for what other people say, but in extreme cases of racist/holocaust revisionist crap or whatever you'll try and step in to protect the integrity of the board. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=newkid@rigorousintuition>NewKid</A> at: 3/7/06 12:24 pm<br></i>
NewKid
 
Posts: 1036
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:57 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What I said

Postby nomo » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:09 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Those who believe in CD reject the Bushie Agenda and all its criminality, while those who reject CD...in essence, even though many equivocate, accept the Bushie agenda and the racist myth of OBL etc.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>You know, I resent that. Just because I don't believe in the fairy tale that is CD doesn't mean I "accept the Bushie agenda." And OBL is now a "racist myth"? <br><br>Sorry dude. You're jumping to conclusions, both in this, and in suggesting DE must be a mental patient with an agenda. How the hell do you know? From reading a message board?<br><br>Do you think there's maybe a slight possibility you're wrong, or let's just say, a bit too gullible? <br><br>You know, as they say, <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>don't read everything you believe.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: What I said

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:29 pm

Just curious, but is Makow off the table?<br><br>I don't think he's an anti-semite when you read his writings in its entirety, especially when he calls it a conspiracy that is mostly freemasonry and luciferianism. He's also Jewish let's not forget.<br><br>My own take on things is that every major religion has been co-opted, which includes Christianity too. Pope's inverted cross, anyone?<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v709/raichu4u/wiggle.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Makow

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:33 pm

Regarding Makow, I've asked members to consider carefully his content, because virtually everything of his that gets posted here has ended up locked and in the Fire Pit. He espouses racial theories that are not welcome here, regardless of his own heritage. <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Makow

Postby thumperton » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:36 pm

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Regarding Makow, I've asked members to consider carefully his content, because virtually everything of his that gets posted here has ended up locked and in the Fire Pit. He espouses racial theories that are not welcome here, regardless of his own heritage.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END-->but isn't Kabbalism a religion more than a race? <!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="http://www.smiliesftw.com/!/happysad.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=thumperton@rigorousintuition>thumperton</A> at: 3/7/06 12:37 pm<br></i>
thumperton
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nomo

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Mar 07, 2006 3:53 pm

<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>You know, I resent that. Just because I don't believe in the fairy tale that is CD doesn't mean I "accept the Bushie agenda." And OBL is now a "racist myth"?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br>You call CD a 'fairy tale' even though it's based on physics...and you accept the 'Arab in a Cave stopped the entire $400 billion a year US Military to responding to an attack on their homeland'. You don't make sense, nomo...but don't let that stop you.<br><br>And, yes, OBL is a 'racist myth'. Deliberate targetting of Arabs as patsies is racist. All the evidence points to an inside job performed by whites...many of whom have dual citizenships with a foreign country. There is a distinct 'odeur' of racism permeating the entire 9/11 Official Story.<br><br>and it stinks to high Heaven.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>GC<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

greencrow0

Postby Rigorous Intuition » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:02 pm

I've asked members to respectfully disagree regarding the mechanics of 9/11. Being agnostic on CD, as I am as well, doesn't mean accepting the "Bushie agenda." <br><br>Let's try to dismantle some of the wedge issues, okay?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
Rigorous Intuition
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 3:36 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nomo

Postby nomo » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:13 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>You call CD a 'fairy tale' even though it's based on physics...</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>I just question whether the physics of CD even <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>apply </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->to this case. But maybe it's appropriate then to have a theology professor defend this "faith-based" alternate take on the events.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>and you accept the 'Arab in a Cave stopped the entire $400 billion a year US Military to responding to an attack on their homeland'. </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>If anything, statements like <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>that </strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->come across as slightly racist to me.<br><br>But anyway, think about it. There's no doubt in my mind that in terms of logistics, flying planes into buildings is a <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>hell of lot easier</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> than rigging three (or is it four or five by now) buildings with high explosives, and demolishing them in front of a live audience without anyone having a clue. <br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>You don't make sense, nomo...but don't let that stop you.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Well, I'm just trying to keep it simple. If that confuses you, sorry.<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>And, yes, OBL is a 'racist myth'. Deliberate targetting of Arabs as patsies is racist. All the evidence points to an inside job performed by whites...many of whom have dual citizenships with a foreign country. There is a distinct 'odeur' of racism permeating the entire 9/11 Official Story.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>And it's not racist to claim that some "Arab in a cave" could never have co-opted a plan to hijack planes and crash them into buildings? Even when we know OBL and his associates were contemplating such plans for many years? And the CIA and others were issuing warnings about it for at least as long?<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>and it stinks to high Heaven.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>It stinks alright. I guess we're just in disagreement about the cause of this particular odor. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :smokin --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smokin.gif ALT=":smokin"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Nomo

Postby nomo » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:17 pm

<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>All the evidence points to an inside job performed by whites...many of whom have dual citizenships with a foreign country.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>Ack. Totally glossed over this gem. Pray tell, what "foreign country" might this be?<br><br> <p></p><i></i>
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

9/11

Postby greencrow0 » Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:29 pm

Gee, I didn't think saying the truth about 9/11 was such a dangerous act!<br><br>GC <p></p><i></i>
greencrow0
 
Posts: 1481
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:42 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Media and Information Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests