how to beat e-mail surveillance

[rothbardian]

I guess you guys are right. I googled for "iloominaati" and Google came back and asked me if I meant "Illuminati". Busted.<br><br> <p></p><i></i>

[OnoI812]

Iday uyay konw taht if uyay usyay a cmobitnaion of igpay atinlay<br>and the usyay of palecgin jsut the fsirt and lsat lrtets of a ordway in tiher prpoer pisotoin taht msot popele ancay igurefay it out, utbay<br>it wlil oolfay the ilterfays and erxtatrererstlias akile? <p></p><i></i>

[robertdreed]

>Any half brained terrorist wouldnt use email to communicate they messages unless it was disinfo. Theres much better ways of communicating without trace.<br><br>...and any terror group operating in a "cell structure" would most likely be pre-instructed to receive instructions via an innocuously worded phrase, posted on a forum for, say, Tupperware collectors. Or an eBay ad, or a small classified ad in a daily newspaper. <br><br>I persist in thinking that the biggest target of unapproved, unsupervised, "executive ordered" Internet spying is...whistleblowers. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=robertdreed>robertdreed</A> at: 4/23/06 1:29 pm<br></i>

[Dreams End]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Tupperware collectors<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Damn it. Now I have to find another site. <p></p><i></i>

[thoughtographer]

<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.epic.org/">Electronic Privacy Information Center</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br>Oldies, but -- uh -- oldies:<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.epic.org/privacy/carnivore/foia_documents.html">Carnivore FOIA Documents</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br> <p><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>"A crooked stick will cast a crooked shadow."</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>

[CyberChrist]

<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>HMW may be right about 'encrypted messages' drawing special attention.<br><br>I have wanted to hear some informed opinions on the idea of simply misspelling any 'red flag' words, in sending emails.<br><br>I have wanted to feel more secure with my emailing, considering some of the hot topics I'm writing about. It would seem the NSA cannot read millions of emails so they are having their computers do word searches.<br><br>If I just misspelled words like "Ilooominati" or "Aal Keyduh", my friends could understand my meaning, but it would slip by the screens, would it not? Or is that wishful thinking?<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>a) Wishful thinking<br><br>b) The NSA couldn't care less about what you think about the Illuminati.<br><br>c) Encrypted email is usually not worth their effort.<br><br>What they are really looking at these days is not email as much as instant messages and message boards such as this one, which do not use SSL for encryption for whatever reason. <p>--<br>CyberChrist<br>http://www.hackerjournal.org<br>My brain is hung like a horse.</p><i></i>