by Gouda » Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:14 am
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt speaking at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco (the place Ruppert warmed up not too long ago) said <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B6708244B%2DA300%2D4CB6%2DA6B5%2D567D62EF0FE8%7D&siteid=google"> this:</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>"<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>We will have stockpiles of Tamiflu and other antivirals sufficient to supply 25% of the population</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->," he said. "Being able to get pills into the palms of people in a relatively short time is ultimately how we measure success."<br><br>Leavitt called local preparedness the "foundation" of overall pandemic readiness.<br><br>"Any community that fails to prepare with the expectation that the federal government will step in and rescue them will be sadly disappointed," Leavitt said. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>"Not because we lack a will, not because we lack a wallet, but because we lack a way."</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> <hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> No, it's because your will, wallet and ways are fattening Big Pharma & the Pentagon (Rummy's 2-fer-1), its corporate contractors, its corporate politicians, and is blowing up children in Iraq. You have other <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>ways</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. Fuck you, Sir.<br><br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://members.aol.com/bblum6/aer27.htm">William Blum</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> sees, in part, why there is no will or way: <br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>Bird flu and capitalism</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Preparing for and combating the threatened bird flu pandemic would be tough enough under the best of circumstances. But the circumstances the United States has to deal with include the reality that the country, more than any other on earth, is privately owned. It's corporations that we have to rely on to make virtually all the vaccines and drugs needed. The corporations, however, need financial incentives, perhaps the government paying for most or all of the research, and then turning the patent over to the corporations, as has often been the case; the corporations are concerned with being stuck with the cost of overproduction if it turns out that there's no pandemic; they're concerned about lawsuits from the inevitable cases of individuals who suffer ill effects from the vaccines or drugs; they get rather upset about a generic version being made available anywhere in the world; and they're highly concerned about obtaining a suitable profit margin, perhaps leading them to hold back on the supply to cause the price to rise. On top of all that, the corporate medical system has dumped millions of uninsured people into society's lap. How will these people fare during a pandemic?<br><br> What is needed is a mobilization reminiscent of World War Two. At that time the government commandeered the auto manufacturers to make tanks and jeeps instead of private cars. When a pressing need for an atom bomb was seen, Washington did not ask for bids from the private sector; it created the Manhattan Project to do it itself, with no concern for liability protection or profit margins. Women and blacks were given skilled factory jobs they had been traditionally denied. Hollywood was enlisted to make propaganda films. Indeed, much of the nation's activities, including farming, manufacturing, mining, communications, labor, education, and cultural undertakings were in some fashion brought under new and significant government control, with the war effort coming before private profit.<br><br> Those who swear by free enterprise argue that this "socialism" was instituted only because of the exigencies of the war. That's true, but it misses a vital point. The point is that it had been immediately recognized by the government that the wasteful and inefficient capitalist system, always in need of the proper financial care and feeding, was no way to win a war.<br><br> I would add that it's also no way to run a society of human beings with human needs. Most Americans agree with this but are not consciously aware that they hold such a belief. For this reason I've written an essay entitled: "The United States invades, bombs, and kills for it, but do Americans really believe in free enterprise?"<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> However, we certainly ought not trust this particular government with mobilizing a new, bird flu 'manhattan project' (seems they've already had their manhattan project). <br><br>Mike Davis explains why capitalism can't and won't cope with a flu pandemic:<br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>In the United States, the Eisenhower administration rebuffed appeals from public-health experts for a mass-vaccination campaign. Although the surgeon general did appropriate small sums for influenza surveillance, the Republicans in power relied upon free enterprise to develop and distribute the vaccine. "The official national policy at the time," writes Gerald Pyle, "was that the private sector - [drug producers] physicians and hospitals - could easily deal with the problem.” But in the case of influenza, without government co-ordination classical supply-and-demand relationships work mischievously. The vaccine needs to be produced in quantity for immunization at least a month before the peak of an epidemic, but most of the market demand from individual consumers comes only after the epidemic is in full course.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> (<!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>The Monster at our Door</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->, New York and London, The New Press, 2005, page 35) Thanks again to J. Blum for citing Davis in his last <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Calumet Review</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END-->. <br><br>So without government coordination (first they say it is not their role, then they prove they are incompetent, then they reiterate that it is not their role) we are left to the free market, which does work well for a few people. <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>On edit: The double bind is we do not have government that can or will or can be trusted to coordinate. Out with the lot of them!! Edit # 2: I spelled Manhattan wrong. </em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=gouda@rigorousintuition>Gouda</A> at: 3/16/06 8:26 am<br></i>