War Crimes vs 'War Crimes'

[orz]

a little old but i've been offline for a week...<br><br>Here's an interesting <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5343188.stm">COMPARE</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> and <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/5276626.stm">CONTRAST</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--> excercise from the pro-arab<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :rolleyes --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/eyes.gif ALT=":rolleyes"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> BBC!<br><br>Also note the subheadings: 'No justification' - 'Collateral damage' VS 'Massive destruction' - 'Lawful' <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :lol --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/laugh.gif ALT=":lol"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Hugh, seems to me that your theories about titles sending out a message to people who will never see the movie/etc that's being advertised actually really DO apply to newspaper headlines and subheadings, which are clearly often chosen to convey a simplified message which can even be contrary to the meat of the article. But I strangely never see you mention these?... <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :| --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/indifferent.gif ALT=":|"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>