by Dreams End » Sat Jul 09, 2005 11:27 am
My experience (learned the hard way from doing this incorrectly) is to deal with behavior and not speculate on motivation. If someone is engaging in provocateur type actions, call him or her on those actions. We can't know for sure someone's motivation anyway. More frustratingly, even if we DO know with some certainty that someone is an agent or whatever, we often have no way to "prove" that to the community. Sticking to the behavior itself prevents some really long, nasty battles...the very types of energy draining battles that real agents are wanting to provoke in the first place. <br><br>And if they are simply agents and not provocateurs, take a page from some veteran activists I know. Put them to work! In order to find acceptance in a group, they can be among the hardest workers. Hey, if you aren't doing anything illegal and they aren't doing anything to undermine...why not? <br><br>Finally, I do NOT agree that the struggle against all these forces will always be by legal means. Especially as what is legal continues to be narrowed. For example, it could be illegal to peacefully assemble during code red. Would we not advocate breaking that law? We may have different opinions about what is needed, ultimately, and what forms the struggle will take, but out of respect and security, refraining from calls for violence online, especially on someone ELSE's forum, is just common sense. <p></p><i></i>