by antiaristo » Thu Oct 06, 2005 5:33 pm
Look who's coming to America<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr><!--EZCODE FONT START--><span style="font-size:small;">Royal couple plan charm offensive on first official tour of US</span><!--EZCODE FONT END--><br>BY ADAM FRESCO<br><br> <br>THE Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall will travel to the United States for their first joint official royal tour to win over the hearts and minds of the American public. The trip, early next month, is seen as an attempt to restore the popularity of the Royal Family in the US, which plummeted after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1997. It will take in New York, Washington and San Francisco and will be the latest part of a huge PR campaign to get more American tourists to visit London.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--> <br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1813145,00.html">www.timesonline.co.uk/art...45,00.html</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>The help I need is to get a journalist to question Camilla about the Treason Felony Act</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br>- whether she believes that an emergency law passed 157 years ago should remain in force today<br>- whether she intends to use herself, or allow others to use, this law<br>- whether she supports repeal<br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>I’m very serious about this</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END-->. Let me quote some correspondence to make my point. The context was that the previous Archbishop, Lord George Carey, had penned a piece (for Rupert’s Rag, of course) in which he was putting pressure on Dr Williams to approve a Church wedding for the Heir. As you know, the pressure was resisted.<br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Dr Rowan Williams<br>Archbishop of Canterbury<br>8 June 2004<br><br>Your Grace,<br>I write further to my copy letters to Sir Michael Peat (Enclosed).<br>I am moved to once again put words on paper by the extraordinary comments published by the retired Dr Carey. That he should slander a dead woman whose death, might I remind you, is the subject of a murder “inquiry”, runs counter to any notion of Christian conscience. Would you please be so kind as to have your office relay to him a copy of my remarks to Sir John Stevens of 12 January this year?<br><br>To set up the dead Diana as the “baddie”, thus making Camilla the “goodie”, with an innocent Charles drawn naturally to the latter and repulsed by the former, is a grotesque inversion worthy of Bush. To pretend that this marriage campaign is anything other than a matter of State is a betrayal of the people and a lie of Blair proportions.<br><br>The fact of the matter, Your Grace, is that the Windsors and the Bushes are absolutely desperate to create a new queen. The foundation of the Windsor Tyranny is the Treason Felony Act of 1848, which outlaws any opposition of any nature whatsoever to the person of “our Most Gracious Lady the Queen”. For the past hundred and fifty-six years there have been one, two or even (as in 1953) three queens simultaneously. But if there is no queen, there is no Treason Felony Act, and no wholesale criminalization of the Anglo/American working class.<br><br>You yourself spoke out loudly against the invasion of Iraq. We know it was an illegal unjust and immoral war of choice. Yet Britain could never have taken part in this vile aggression had there been no queen. This war was forced down the throats of the people by means of lies and forgeries enabled and empowered by the Treason Felony Act. <br><br><!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>FOR THE AVOIDANCE OF DOUBT: IF YOU CHEAT AND “BEND THE RULES” AS DR CAREY IS SUGGESTING, YOU WILL BE SOWING THE SEEDS FOR MANY FUTURE WARS OF AGGRESSION.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>Dr Carey suggests the couple be left to make the decision for themselves. This self-dealing is directly analogous to the self-dealing on the vast estate built up by the Queen Mother. Everybody has to pay taxes, except for any queen. Will Queen Camilla be any different, I wonder? For make no mistake: if Charles marries Camilla, and Charles becomes King, then Mrs Parker Bowles becomes the Sovereign. She can do anything, including kill the King, and nobody can stop her. <!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>SHE IS THE WOLF IN SHEEP’S’ CLOTHING.</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--><br><br>As a Christian I must say that I object strongly to Carey’s introduction of class discrimination into the love of Jesus. How can it be that Carey claims the love and compassion of Jesus on behalf of those he knows to deny that same love to members of the working class? Those he knows to have deliberately stolen our very souls?<br><br>Jesus had his own words for the Pharisees, did he not?<br><br>I take it you already know about all about the pain and suffering and desolation I have endured these last ten years on the run from the many sadists amongst the Windsors. No income and dependent on charity. Never daring to go near my beloved daughters Victoria and Georgia, for fear of broken bones. Knowing that my own life could be snuffed out at any moment, as they have snuffed out so many others. But I’ve said all this before, and shown all the proof to the European Court of Human Rights. It makes no difference at all to these “young lovers”, and I’ve no chance of ever getting back my children while there is a queen.<br><br>If you do not already know then the documents are on file at the Court (ref. 24316/03 John Cleary v United Kingdom) and can be accessed at any time up to November this year. With respect, your duty is to protect your flock. We neither want, need nor deserve another Killer Queen.<br>RSVP <br>Yours sincerely,<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK START--><a href="http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm9.showMessageRange?topicID=6.topic&start=21&stop=40">p216.ezboard.com/frigorou...21&stop=40</a><!--EZCODE AUTOLINK END--><br>Post 187<br><br><br>Crazy, eh? Except Lambeth Palace KNOWS IT TO BE TRUE.<br>Back came the reply.<br><br><br><!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>Mr Andrew Nunn<br>Lay Assistant to The Archbishop of Canterbury<br><br>16 June 2004<br><br>Dear Mr Cleary,<br><br>Thank you for your recent letter received here at Lambeth Palace. As your comments relate to remarks made by or attributed to Lord Carey, the correspondence is being forwarded to him at the House of Lords.<br><br>With very best wishes,<br>Andrew Nunn<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>In other words, the Archbishop went as far as he could WITHIN THE LAW to confirm the truth of what I was saying.<br> <p></p><i></i>
